Samsung Galaxy F04 vs Nokia G11 Plus: Which Budget Champion Reigns Supreme?

The Samsung Galaxy F04 and Nokia G11 Plus represent the fiercely competitive sub-$150 smartphone market. Both aim to deliver essential functionality at an accessible price, but they take different approaches to achieving this. The F04 leverages MediaTek’s Helio P35, while the G11 Plus opts for Unisoc’s T606. This comparison dissects these choices, revealing which device offers the best balance of performance, battery life, and overall value.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user prioritizing consistent, if not blazing-fast, performance and a slightly faster charging experience, the Samsung Galaxy F04 emerges as the better choice. While the Nokia G11 Plus offers a more modern CPU architecture, the Helio P35’s higher clock speeds translate to a more responsive user experience in everyday tasks.

PHONES
Phone Names Samsung Galaxy F04 Nokia G11 Plus
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 - International
4G bands1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 411, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International
SpeedHSPA, LTEHSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTEGSM / HSPA / LTE
 -1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 - India
Launch
Announced2023, January 042022, June 29
StatusAvailable. Released 2023, January 12Available. Released 2022, July 20
Body
BuildGlass front, plastic back, plastic frameGlass front, plastic frame, plastic back
Dimensions164.2 x 75.9 x 9.1 mm (6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 in)164.8 x 75.9 x 8.6 mm (6.49 x 2.99 x 0.34 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight188 g (6.63 oz)192 g (6.77 oz)
 -Splash protection
Display
Resolution720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density)720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density)
Size6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio)6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~82.1% screen-to-body ratio)
TypePLS LCDIPS LCD, 90Hz, 400 nits (typ)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (4x2.35 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53)Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
ChipsetMediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm)Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
GPUPowerVR GE8320Mali-G57 MP1
OSAndroid 12, One UIAndroid 12, upgradable to Android 13
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXC (dedicated slot)microSDXC (dedicated slot)
Internal64GB 4GB RAM32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 3GB RAM
 -eMMC 5.1
Main Camera
Dual13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), AF Auxiliary lens50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.67", PDAF Auxiliary lens
FeaturesLED flashLED flash
Single-8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0"
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Selfie camera
Single5 MP, f/2.28 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0"
VideoYes1080p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack YesYes
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker YesYes
Comms
Bluetooth5.0, A2DP, LE5.0, A2DP, LE
NFCNoNo
PositioningGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDSGPS
RadioUnspecifiedFM radio
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsAccelerometer, proximityFingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity
Battery
Charging15W wired10W wired
TypeLi-Po 5000 mAhLi-Ion 5000 mAh
Misc
ColorsJade Purple, Opal GreenLake Blue, Charcoal Grey
ModelsSM-E045F, SM-E045F/DS-
PriceAbout 90 EURAbout 130 EUR
SAR0.38 W/kg (head)-

Samsung Galaxy F04

  • Faster 15W charging
  • Higher CPU clock speeds for snappier performance
  • Potentially more responsive user experience

  • Older CPU architecture
  • Likely less frequent software updates

Nokia G11 Plus

  • More modern CPU architecture (Cortex-A75)
  • Potential for better long-term software support (Nokia's promise)
  • Clean Android experience

  • Slower 10W charging
  • Lower CPU clock speeds may result in occasional lag
  • Performance may not match the F04 in everyday tasks

Display Comparison

Neither Samsung nor Nokia provide detailed display specifications for these models. Given their price point, both likely utilize LCD panels with 720p+ resolution. The absence of information regarding peak brightness or color gamut suggests neither device will excel in outdoor visibility or color accuracy. Bezels are expected to be substantial on both, contributing to a less immersive viewing experience. The focus here is clearly on affordability, not display quality.

Camera Comparison

Detailed camera specifications are scarce. Both phones likely feature a primary camera around the 13MP mark, accompanied by lower-resolution depth or macro sensors. Image quality will be heavily reliant on software processing, and neither device is expected to deliver exceptional results. The aperture of the main sensor will be a key determinant of low-light performance, but this information is unavailable. The 2MP macro cameras found on both devices are largely marketing filler and offer limited practical utility. Expect similar camera performance from both, with neither excelling in any particular area.

Performance

The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Samsung Galaxy F04’s MediaTek Helio P35 features an octa-core configuration with four Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 2.35 GHz and another four at 1.8 GHz. The Nokia G11 Plus utilizes the Unisoc T606, also an octa-core chip, but with a more modern split: two Cortex-A75 cores at 1.6 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores at 1.6 GHz. While the Unisoc T606’s A75 cores offer superior individual performance compared to the Helio P35’s A53 cores, the lower clock speeds and the greater number of less powerful A55 cores mean the F04 will likely feel snappier in many everyday tasks. The Helio P35’s higher clock speeds provide a noticeable advantage in responsiveness. Both devices will struggle with graphically intensive games, but the F04 may maintain a slightly more stable framerate due to its higher CPU clock.

Battery Life

Battery capacity is not explicitly stated for either device, but both likely house around a 5000mAh battery, typical for this price segment. However, the charging speeds differ significantly. The Samsung Galaxy F04 supports 15W wired charging, while the Nokia G11 Plus is limited to 10W. This translates to a noticeably faster 0-100% charge time on the F04. While both phones should easily last a full day with moderate usage, the faster charging on the F04 provides a convenience advantage, especially for users who frequently need to top up their battery.

Buying Guide

Buy the Samsung Galaxy F04 if you need a phone that feels consistently responsive for daily tasks like browsing, social media, and messaging, and if you value a slightly quicker charging cycle. Buy the Nokia G11 Plus if you prioritize a more modern CPU architecture and potentially better long-term software support, understanding that you might experience occasional slowdowns in demanding applications.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Will the Unisoc T606 in the Nokia G11 Plus struggle with multitasking compared to the Helio P35?
While the Unisoc T606 has a more modern architecture, the Helio P35’s higher clock speeds give it an edge in handling multiple apps simultaneously. The T606’s A75 cores are powerful, but the overall system performance is likely to feel less fluid when switching between apps or running demanding applications concurrently.
❓ How long will it take to fully charge each phone from 0%?
With 15W charging, the Samsung Galaxy F04 should fully charge in approximately 2.5 to 3 hours. The Nokia G11 Plus, limited to 10W, will likely take around 3.5 to 4 hours to reach 100%. This difference is significant for users who prioritize quick top-ups.
❓ Is the Nokia G11 Plus guaranteed to receive more Android updates than the Samsung Galaxy F04?
Nokia has a stated commitment to providing regular software updates and security patches for its devices. Samsung’s update policy for the Galaxy F series is less consistent. While no guarantees exist, the Nokia G11 Plus is *likely* to receive more frequent and longer-term software support.