Looking for an affordable smartphone that doesn't completely break the bank? The Samsung Galaxy F04 and Motorola Moto E13 are both contenders in the budget phone arena. But which one offers the best value for your money? Let's dive into a detailed comparison.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy F04 edges out the Moto E13 thanks to its slightly faster chipset and quicker charging. However, the Moto E13 might offer a cleaner software experience and potentially better availability depending on your region. Both are solid choices for budget-conscious buyers.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, January 04 | 2023, January 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, January 12 | Available. Released 2023, February 13 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.2 x 75.9 x 9.1 mm (6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 in) | 164.2 x 75 x 8.5 mm (6.46 x 2.95 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 179.5 g (6.35 oz) |
| | - | Water-resistant design |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~82.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | PLS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.35 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| OS | Android 12, One UI | Android 13 (Go edition) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM, 64GB 2GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), AF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2 | 5 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Jade Purple, Opal Green | Cosmic Black, Creamy White, Aurora Green |
| Models | SM-E045F, SM-E045F/DS | - |
| Price | About 90 EUR | $ 119.99 / € 104.99 |
| SAR | 0.38 W/kg (head) | - |
Samsung Galaxy F04
- Slightly faster chipset
- Faster 15W charging
- Potentially better color accuracy on display
- Samsung's One UI (preference-based)
- Software bloatware possible
- Camera performance limited in low light
- Design may be less appealing to some
Motorola Moto E13
- Clean, near-stock Android experience
- Potentially better availability
- Reliable battery life
- Simple and user-friendly
- Slower 10W charging
- Less powerful chipset
- Camera performance limited in low light
- Basic design
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.6-inch HD+ display, offering decent viewing angles for everyday use. The Samsung might have slightly better color accuracy, but the difference is minimal at this price point. Expect similar brightness levels and viewing experiences.
Camera Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy F04 typically features a dual-camera setup (13MP main + 2MP depth) while the Moto E13 often has a single 13MP main camera. Image quality is comparable in good lighting conditions, but both struggle in low light. Samsung's software processing might offer slightly more vibrant colors.
Performance
The Samsung Galaxy F04's Mediatek Helio P35 generally outperforms the Unisoc T606 in the Moto E13. While both are entry-level chipsets, the F04's CPU clock speeds give it a slight advantage in multitasking and app loading times. Don't expect flagship performance, but the F04 handles basic tasks more smoothly.
Battery Life
The Moto E13 typically packs a larger battery (5000mAh) compared to the F04 (5000mAh). However, the F04's 15W charging is faster than the Moto E13's 10W charging, meaning it will recharge quicker. Battery life will be similar in real-world usage, lasting a full day for moderate users.
Buying Guide
The Samsung Galaxy F04 is ideal for users prioritizing a bit more processing power and faster charging. The Motorola Moto E13 is a good fit for those who prefer a near-stock Android experience and value simplicity. Consider your software preference and charging needs.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better software support?
Motorola generally provides quicker Android updates and a cleaner software experience. Samsung's One UI is feature-rich but can be considered bloated by some.
❓ Can these phones handle gaming?
Neither phone is designed for demanding gaming. They can handle basic games, but expect lower frame rates and graphical settings.
