The Samsung Galaxy F02s represents an entry point into the Samsung ecosystem, prioritizing affordability. Conversely, the Galaxy A54 aims for a more balanced experience, offering a significant step up in processing power and display quality. This comparison dissects the core differences between these two devices, helping you determine if the A54’s premium features justify its higher price tag.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a smooth, responsive experience and a vibrant display, the Samsung Galaxy A54 is the clear winner. Its Exynos 1380 chipset and 980 nit display offer a substantial upgrade over the F02s’ Snapdragon 450 and basic panel. However, the F02s remains a viable option for those on a very tight budget.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 25, 41, 66, 71 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, April 05 | 2023, March 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, April 09 | Available. Released 2023, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.2 x 75.9 x 9.1 mm (6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 in) | 158.2 x 76.7 x 8.2 mm (6.23 x 3.02 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 196 g (6.91 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| | - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | PLS LCD | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM450 Snapdragon 450 (14 nm) | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 506 | Mali-G68 MP5 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2 | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), AF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.X", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2 | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | - | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (USA only) |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Ceramic Blue, Ceramic White, Ceramic Black | Lime, Graphite, Violet, White |
| Models | SM-E025F, SM-E025F/DS | SM-A546V, SM-A546U, SM-A546U1, SM-A546B, SM-A546B/DS, SM-A546E, SM-A546E/DS, SM-A5460, SM-A546M, SM-A546M/DS, SM-A546W |
| Price | About 100 EUR | € 210.00 / $ 119.11 / £ 169.95 / ₹ 28,999 |
| SAR | 0.52 W/kg (head) | 0.81 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.69 W/kg (head) 1.34 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 119h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.6 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 506678 (v9)
GeekBench: 2703 (v5.1), 2797 (v6)
GFXBench: 25fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Samsung Galaxy F02s
- Extremely affordable price point
- Functional for basic smartphone tasks
- Acceptable battery life for light usage
- Outdated Snapdragon 450 chipset
- Likely low-resolution display
- Limited camera capabilities
Samsung Galaxy A54
- Powerful Exynos 1380 chipset
- Bright and vibrant 980 nit display
- Excellent battery life and 25W charging
- Higher price tag
- May be overkill for basic users
- Potential for software bloat (typical Samsung)
Display Comparison
The Galaxy A54 boasts a significantly superior display experience. While the F02s’ display specifications are not provided, it’s reasonable to assume a lower peak brightness and resolution compared to the A54’s measured 980 nits. This higher brightness translates to better visibility outdoors. The A54’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio (nominal) suggests a VA panel, offering deeper blacks than the F02s likely utilizes. The A54’s display is geared towards immersive media consumption, while the F02s is likely adequate for basic viewing.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but the A54 is expected to deliver significantly better results. While specific sensor details are missing for both, the A54 benefits from a more powerful ISP (Image Signal Processor) integrated within the Exynos 1380. This allows for improved image processing, noise reduction, and dynamic range. The F02s’ camera system is likely focused on affordability, potentially sacrificing image quality and features like optical image stabilization (OIS). The A54’s camera is designed for versatile photography, while the F02s is suitable for casual snapshots.
Performance
The performance gap between these devices is substantial. The Galaxy A54’s Exynos 1380, built on a 5nm process, features a combination of Cortex-A78 and Cortex-A55 cores clocked up to 2.4 GHz. This contrasts sharply with the F02s’ Snapdragon 450 (14nm) and its Cortex-A53 cores running at 1.8 GHz. The 5nm fabrication process of the Exynos 1380 provides superior power efficiency and thermal management, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling during sustained workloads. The A54 will handle multitasking, gaming, and demanding applications with ease, while the F02s will struggle with anything beyond basic tasks.
Battery Life
The Galaxy A54 achieves an impressive endurance rating of 119 hours and an active use score of 11:15h, indicating excellent battery life. While the F02s’ battery capacity isn’t specified, its less powerful chipset and likely lower-resolution display suggest reasonable, though not exceptional, battery performance. The A54 also supports 25W wired charging, significantly faster than the F02s’ 15W charging, reducing recharge times.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Galaxy F02s if you need a functional smartphone for basic tasks like calls, messaging, and light social media use, and your budget is under $150. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A54 if you prioritize a fluid user experience, enjoy media consumption with a bright and clear display, and want a capable camera system for everyday photography and video recording.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Exynos 1380 in the A54 tend to overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Exynos 1380, built on a 5nm process, is generally efficient and well-managed in the A54. While some heat generation is inevitable during intensive gaming, Samsung’s thermal management system effectively prevents significant throttling, maintaining consistent performance for extended periods. However, sustained use in very hot environments could lead to some performance reduction.
❓ Is the 2MP macro camera on the F02s actually useful for taking detailed close-up photos?
Generally, 2MP macro cameras on budget phones like the F02s offer limited utility. The low resolution results in images lacking detail and sharpness. While they can capture close-up shots, the quality is often subpar compared to using the main camera with digital zoom. It's primarily a marketing feature rather than a genuinely useful photographic tool.
❓ Can the Galaxy A54 handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile at high frame rates (90fps)?
Yes, the Galaxy A54 is capable of running PUBG Mobile at high frame rates (60fps or potentially higher depending on settings). The Exynos 1380 chipset and ample RAM provide sufficient processing power for a smooth gaming experience. However, achieving consistently high frame rates may require adjusting graphics settings based on your preference for visual fidelity.
