The Samsung Galaxy F02s and A50s represent different points in Samsung’s strategy. The F02s is a budget-focused device, while the A50s aimed for a mid-range sweet spot. Both offer Samsung’s One UI, but diverge significantly in their underlying hardware, impacting performance and user experience. This comparison dissects those differences to help you choose.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Samsung Galaxy A50s is the superior choice. Its Exynos 9611 chipset delivers significantly better CPU and GPU performance than the Snapdragon 450 in the F02s, making it more suitable for multitasking, gaming, and demanding applications. While both charge at the same speed, the A50s’ processing power justifies its higher initial cost.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, April 05 | 2019, August 22. Released 2019, September |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, April 09 | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.2 x 75.9 x 9.1 mm (6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 in) | 158.5 x 74.5 x 7.7 mm (6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 196 g (6.91 oz) | 169 g (5.96 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | PLS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM450 Snapdragon 450 (14 nm) | Exynos 9611 (10 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 506 | Mali-G72 MP3 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 11, One UI 3.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2 | - |
| Triple | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), AF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2 | 32 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | - | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| | - | ANT+ |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Ceramic Blue, Ceramic White, Ceramic Black | Prism Crush Black, Prism Crush White, Prism Crush Green, Prism Crush Violet2 |
| Models | SM-E025F, SM-E025F/DS | SM-A507F, SM-A507FN, SM-A5070 |
| Price | About 100 EUR | About 290 EUR |
| SAR | 0.52 W/kg (head) | - |
| SAR EU | - | 0.43 W/kg (head) 1.55 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 154761 (v7)
GeekBench: 5295 (v4.4)
GFXBench: 9.2fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Samsung Galaxy F02s
- More affordable price point
- Decent battery life for basic usage
- Samsung’s One UI software
- Significantly slower performance
- Less capable camera system
- Limited multitasking capabilities
Samsung Galaxy A50s
- Faster and more responsive performance
- Better camera quality
- More suitable for gaming and demanding apps
- Higher price
- Potentially slightly shorter battery life under heavy load
- May be harder to find new
Display Comparison
Neither Samsung provides detailed display specs beyond resolution in their marketing materials. However, both likely utilize LCD panels, common for their respective price points. The A50s benefits from the more powerful chipset to drive a potentially higher resolution display with greater fluidity. The F02s, constrained by the Snapdragon 450, likely prioritizes efficiency over display fidelity. Bezels are expected to be similar, reflecting design trends of their release periods.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specs are lacking, but the A50s likely features a more capable main sensor due to its positioning as a mid-range device. While both phones likely include multiple rear cameras, the F02s’ Snapdragon 450’s image signal processor (ISP) is less sophisticated than the A50s’ Exynos 9611 ISP. This translates to slower image processing, less effective noise reduction, and potentially lower dynamic range in the F02s. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on both is largely a marketing tactic, offering limited practical benefit due to the low resolution and lack of optical image stabilization (OIS).
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Samsung Galaxy A50s’ Exynos 9611, built on a 10nm process, features a heterogeneous core configuration with four Cortex-A73 cores clocked at 2.3 GHz and four Cortex-A53 cores at 1.7 GHz. This contrasts sharply with the Galaxy F02s’ Snapdragon 450, an octa-core processor comprised entirely of Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz. The Exynos 9611’s A73 cores provide a substantial performance uplift in CPU-intensive tasks, while its GPU offers a significantly better gaming experience. The 10nm process also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling under sustained load.
Battery Life
Both devices support 15W wired charging, meaning charging times will be comparable. However, the A50s’ more efficient Exynos 9611 chipset, coupled with potential software optimizations, may result in slightly better real-world battery life despite potentially having a similar battery capacity. The Snapdragon 450 in the F02s prioritizes power efficiency, but the less demanding tasks it handles mean the difference in battery life may not be substantial for typical users.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Galaxy F02s if you need a basic smartphone for essential tasks like calls, messaging, and light social media use, and your budget is extremely limited. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A50s if you prioritize smoother performance for everyday tasks, enjoy occasional gaming, and want a more responsive user experience, even if it means spending a bit more.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Exynos 9611 in the A50s tend to overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Exynos 9611 isn't a flagship-level chip, its 10nm process and thermal design generally prevent significant overheating during typical gaming. Some throttling may occur during extended, graphically intensive sessions, but it's unlikely to cause performance-crippling heat issues.
❓ Is the Snapdragon 450 in the F02s powerful enough to run popular social media apps smoothly?
Yes, the Snapdragon 450 is sufficient for running most social media applications like Facebook, Instagram, and TikTok. However, expect some lag when switching between multiple apps or loading media-rich content. It's designed for basic tasks, not demanding multitasking.
❓ How does the camera performance differ between the two phones in low-light conditions?
The A50s will significantly outperform the F02s in low-light photography. The Exynos 9611’s ISP and potentially larger sensor capture more light, resulting in brighter, clearer images with less noise. The F02s’ Snapdragon 450 struggles in low light, producing grainy and underexposed photos.
❓ Can either of these phones handle playing PUBG Mobile at high frame rates?
The A50s can run PUBG Mobile at medium settings with reasonably stable frame rates. However, achieving 60fps consistently may require lowering the graphics settings. The F02s will struggle to maintain playable frame rates even at the lowest settings, making the experience less enjoyable.
