The Samsung Galaxy F02s and the Infinix Smart 5 Pro represent the extreme end of the budget smartphone market. Both aim to deliver essential smartphone functionality at the lowest possible price point, but they take different approaches to achieving this. This comparison dissects their core components to determine which device offers the best value for users prioritizing affordability.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user needing a reliable, if basic, smartphone experience, the Samsung Galaxy F02s edges out the Infinix Smart 5 Pro. The Snapdragon 450, despite its age, offers a more mature and generally smoother experience than the Unisoc SC9863A, and the 15W charging is a noticeable advantage.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 40, 66 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, April 05 | 2021, November 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, April 09 | Available. Released 2021, November 17 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.2 x 75.9 x 9.1 mm (6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 in) | 164.4 x 75.6 x 9.5 mm (6.47 x 2.98 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 196 g (6.91 oz) | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~82.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | PLS LCD | IPS LCD, 500 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM450 Snapdragon 450 (14 nm) | Unisoc SC9863A (28 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 506 | IMG8322 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 11 (Go edition), XOS 7.6 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 13 MP, f/1.8, AF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash | Quad-LED flash |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2 | 8 MP |
| Triple | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), AF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1440p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | Dual-LED flash |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2 | 8 MP |
| Video | - | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP | 4.2, A2DP |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Ceramic Blue, Ceramic White, Ceramic Black | Morandi Green, Heart of Ocean |
| Models | SM-E025F, SM-E025F/DS | - |
| Price | About 100 EUR | About 70 EUR |
| SAR | 0.52 W/kg (head) | - |
Samsung Galaxy F02s
- More established chipset (Snapdragon 450)
- Faster 15W charging
- Potentially smoother software experience
- Older processor architecture (Cortex-A53)
- Larger manufacturing process (14nm)
Infinix Smart 5 Pro
- Newer processor architecture (Cortex-A55)
- Potentially lower price
- More efficient CPU cores (A55)
- Less efficient manufacturing process (28nm)
- Slower 10W charging
- Potentially less optimized software
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely feature LCD panels, typical for this price bracket. However, detailed display specs (resolution, brightness) are missing. The focus here is on internal components. The absence of information on PWM dimming rates makes it impossible to assess potential eye strain, a crucial factor for prolonged use.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is likely to be similar on both devices, leaning towards basic functionality. Detailed sensor information is unavailable, but both will likely feature a primary sensor paired with lower-resolution auxiliary lenses. Given the price point, image quality will be heavily reliant on software processing, and neither device is expected to excel in low-light conditions. The absence of OIS on either device means image stabilization will be purely digital, further impacting low-light performance.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Samsung Galaxy F02s utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, a 14nm process node chip with an octa-core Cortex-A53 CPU clocked at 1.8 GHz. The Infinix Smart 5 Pro features the Unisoc SC9863A, built on a less efficient 28nm process. While the Unisoc chip also has an octa-core configuration, it’s split into 4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 cores and 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The Cortex-A55 is a more efficient architecture than the A53, but the 28nm process and lower clock speeds on half the cores likely result in lower overall performance. The Snapdragon 450 benefits from Qualcomm’s optimization and a more mature software ecosystem, leading to a smoother user experience despite the older architecture. This translates to quicker app loading times and less stuttering during basic tasks.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified for either device, making a direct comparison difficult. However, the charging wattage is a key differentiator. The Samsung Galaxy F02s supports 15W wired charging, while the Infinix Smart 5 Pro is limited to 10W. This means the F02s will charge significantly faster, reducing downtime. Even with a similar battery capacity, the faster charging speed provides a tangible benefit for users who rely on their phones throughout the day.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Galaxy F02s if you need a phone with a more established chipset and a slightly faster charging experience, even if it means sacrificing some theoretical multi-core performance. Buy the Infinix Smart 5 Pro if you prioritize a newer processor architecture (Cortex-A55) and are willing to accept potentially lower overall performance and slower charging in exchange for a potentially lower price.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Unisoc SC9863A in the Infinix Smart 5 Pro struggle with multitasking?
The Unisoc SC9863A, while featuring a modern Cortex-A55 architecture, is hampered by its 28nm process and lower clock speeds. Expect some slowdowns when running multiple apps simultaneously, especially more demanding applications. The Snapdragon 450 in the F02s is likely to handle multitasking slightly better.
❓ How long will it take to fully charge the Samsung Galaxy F02s with the 15W charger?
Without knowing the battery capacity, it's difficult to provide an exact time. However, 15W charging will likely take around 2-3 hours for a full charge, significantly faster than the Infinix Smart 5 Pro's 10W charging, which could take upwards of 3-4 hours.
❓ Is the performance difference between the Snapdragon 450 and Unisoc SC9863A noticeable in everyday use?
Yes, the Snapdragon 450 generally provides a smoother and more responsive experience for everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and messaging. The Unisoc chip may exhibit occasional lag or stuttering, particularly when opening multiple apps or switching between them.
