Samsung Galaxy F02s vs. Apple iPhone 7: A Battle of Generations
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing longevity and a refined user experience, the Apple iPhone 7 remains the better choice despite its age. Its A10 Fusion chip, while older, delivers smoother performance than the Snapdragon 450, and the 61-hour endurance rating provides superior battery life. However, the F02s offers a newer Android experience at a lower price point.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Samsung Galaxy F02s | Apple iPhone 7 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - A1660, A1778 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - A1660, A1778 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41 - A1660, A1778 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (3CA) Cat9 450/50 Mbps, EV-DO Rev.A 3.1 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO & TD-SCDMA - A1660 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, April 05 | 2016, September 07. Released 2016, September 16 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, April 09 | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Corning-made glass), aluminum back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 164.2 x 75.9 x 9.1 mm (6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 in) | 138.3 x 67.1 x 7.1 mm (5.44 x 2.64 x 0.28 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 196 g (6.91 oz) | 138 g (4.87 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) Apple Pay (Visa, MasterCard, AMEX certified) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Ion-strengthened glass |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 750 x 1334 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~326 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 4.7 inches, 60.9 cm2 (~65.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | PLS LCD | Retina IPS LCD, 625 nits (typ) |
| - | 3D Touch display & home button | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 | Quad-core 2.34 GHz (2x Hurricane + 2x Zephyr) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM450 Snapdragon 450 (14 nm) | Apple A10 Fusion (16 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 506 | PowerVR Series7XT Plus (six-core graphics) |
| OS | Android 10 | iOS 10.0.1, upgradable to iOS 15.8.5 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM, 128GB 2GB RAM, 256GB 2GB RAM |
| eMMC 5.1 | NVMe | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash | Quad-LED dual-tone flash, HDR |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2 | 12 MP, f/1.8, 28mm (wide), 1/3.0", PDAF, OIS |
| Triple | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), AF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@240fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | Face detection, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2 | 7 MP, f/2.2, 32mm (standard) |
| Video | - | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP | 4.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | Lightning, USB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, hotspot |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (front-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | - |
| Talk time | - | Up to 14 h (3G) |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 1960 mAh, non-removable (7.45 Wh) |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Ceramic Blue, Ceramic White, Ceramic Black | Jet Black, Black, Silver, Gold, Rose Gold, Red |
| Models | SM-E025F, SM-E025F/DS | A1660, A1778, A1779, A1780, A1853, A1866, iPhone9,1, iPhone9,3 |
| Price | About 100 EUR | About 180 EUR |
| SAR | 0.52 W/kg (head) | 1.19 W/kg (head) 1.19 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.38 W/kg (head) 1.34 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Audio quality | - | Noise -92.4dB / Crosstalk -80.9dB |
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 61h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1603:1 (nominal), 3.964 (sunlight) |
| Loudspeaker | - | Voice 67dB / Noise 73dB / Ring 75dB |
| Performance | - | Basemark OS II 2.0: 3416 |
Samsung Galaxy F02s
- More affordable price point
- Newer Android operating system
- Potentially larger display size
- Significantly weaker processor performance
- Likely inferior camera quality
- Unknown battery capacity
Apple iPhone 7
- Superior processor performance (A10 Fusion)
- Excellent battery life (61h endurance)
- Refined iOS ecosystem
- Older operating system (limited software updates)
- Higher price compared to F02s
- Smaller display size
Display Comparison
Both devices share a similar contrast ratio of 1603:1 (nominal) and 3.964 (sunlight), suggesting comparable outdoor visibility. However, the F02s likely benefits from a larger display size, typical of its market segment, while the iPhone 7 prioritizes a more compact form factor. Details regarding the F02s' panel technology (IPS vs. TFT) are missing, but the iPhone 7's display, while dated, was known for its color accuracy. The absence of high refresh rate technology on either device is expected given their respective release timelines.
Camera Comparison
While both phones offer photo and video capabilities, the iPhone 7 likely holds an advantage in image processing and overall quality. Apple’s image signal processor (ISP) in the A10 Fusion is known for its excellent dynamic range and color reproduction. The F02s’ camera specifications are not detailed enough to make a precise comparison, but budget phones often compromise on sensor size and lens quality. The iPhone 7’s camera, even by today’s standards, delivers consistently good results in various lighting conditions. The F02s may offer more camera features due to its newer software, but image quality is likely to be inferior.
Performance
The Apple A10 Fusion, fabricated on a 16nm process, significantly outperforms the Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (14nm) in CPU and GPU benchmarks. The A10’s quad-core architecture (2x Hurricane + 2x Zephyr) allows for more efficient task allocation compared to the F02s’ octa-core Cortex-A53 setup. While the F02s has more cores, the A10’s cores are individually more powerful. This translates to smoother multitasking and a more responsive experience on the iPhone 7, particularly with demanding applications. The Snapdragon 450 is adequate for basic tasks, but will struggle with graphically intensive games or heavy app usage.
Battery Life
The iPhone 7 boasts an impressive endurance rating of 61 hours, indicating excellent battery optimization despite its relatively small battery capacity. The F02s, with its 15W wired charging, offers a more modern charging solution, but its battery capacity is unknown. The A10 Fusion’s power efficiency contributes significantly to the iPhone 7’s longevity. While the F02s may offer faster charging speeds, the iPhone 7’s superior battery life and power management provide a more reliable experience throughout the day.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Galaxy F02s if you need a very affordable Android device for basic tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use, and prefer a larger screen. Buy the Apple iPhone 7 if you prioritize a smoother, more responsive user experience, a well-maintained ecosystem with continued software support (albeit limited), and a more capable camera for everyday photography, even if it means paying a premium.