Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 vs. Ace Style LTE: A Detailed Comparison

Looking for an affordable Samsung smartphone? The Galaxy Ace 3 and Ace Style LTE were popular budget options. But which one offers the better experience? We're diving deep into a head-to-head comparison to help you decide.

Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

The Galaxy Ace Style LTE generally wins due to its quad-core processor offering noticeably better performance. While the Ace 3 boasts impressive battery life, the Ace Style LTE's modern chipset and LTE capabilities make it the more compelling choice for most users.

PHONES
Phone Names	Samsung Galaxy Ace 3	Samsung Galaxy Ace Style LTE G357

Network
2G bands	GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - all versions	GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bands	HSDPA 900 / 2100 - S7270, S7272	HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100
4G bands	3, 7, 8, 20 - S7275	1, 3, 7, 8, 20
Speed	HSPA 42.2(14.4 - 3G)/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps	HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps
Technology	GSM / HSPA / LTE	GSM / HSPA / LTE
	HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 - S7275	-

Launch
Announced	2013, June. Released 2013, July	2014, September. Released 2014, September
Status	Discontinued	Discontinued

Body
Build	Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame	-
Dimensions	121.2 x 62.7 x 9.8 mm (3G) / 121.2 x 62.7 x 10 mm (LTE)	128.9 x 65.8 x 9.1 mm (5.07 x 2.59 x 0.36 in)
SIM	Single SIM (Micro-SIM) or Dual SIM (Micro-SIM, dual stand-by)	Micro-SIM
Weight	115 g (3G) / 119.5 g (LTE) (4.06 oz)	126 g (4.44 oz)

Display
Resolution	480 x 800 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~233 ppi density)	480 x 800 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~217 ppi density)
Size	4.0 inches, 45.5 cm2 (~59.9% screen-to-body ratio)	4.3 inches, 52.6 cm2 (~62.0% screen-to-body ratio)
Type	TFT	Super AMOLED

Platform
CPU	Dual-core 1.0 GHz Cortex-A9 (3G) / Dual-core 1.2 GHz Krait (LTE)	Quad-core 1.2 GHz Cortex-A53
Chipset	Broadcom BCM21664 (3G) / Qualcomm MSM8930 Snapdragon 400 (28 nm) (LTE)	Qualcomm MSM8916 Snapdragon 410 (28 nm)
GPU	Broadcom VideoCore IV (3G) / Adreno 305 (LTE)	Adreno 306
OS	Android 4.2 (Jelly Bean)	Android 4.4.4 (KitKat)

Memory
Card slot	microSDXC (dedicated slot)	microSDXC (dedicated slot)
Internal	4GB 1GB RAM (3G), 8GB 1GB RAM (LTE)	8GB 1GB RAM
	eMMC 4.5	eMMC 4.5

Main Camera
Features	LED flash, panorama	LED flash, panorama
Single	5 MP, f/2.6, AF	5 MP, AF
Video	720p@30fps	720p@30fps

Selfie camera
Single	VGA	1.3 MP

Sound
3.5mm jack	Yes	Yes
35mm jack	Yes	Yes
Loudspeaker	Yes	Yes

Comms
Bluetooth	4.0, A2DP	4.0, A2DP
NFC	Yes (LTE model only)	Yes
Positioning	GPS, GLONASS	GPS, GLONASS
Radio	Stereo FM radio, RDS	Stereo FM radio, RDS, recording
USB	microUSB 2.0	microUSB 2.0
WLAN	Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot	Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot

Features
Sensors	Accelerometer, proximity, compass	Accelerometer, proximity

Battery
Music play	-	Up to 54 h
Stand-by	Up to 370 h (3G)	Up to 285 h (3G)
Talk time	Up to 8 h (3G)	Up to 11 h (3G)
Type	Li-Ion 1800/1500 mAh, removable	Li-Ion 1900 mAh, removable

Misc
Colors	Black, White, Dark Red	White, Gray
Models	GT-S7272, GT-S7275, GT-S7275R, GT-S720, GT-S7270, GT-S7278, GT-S7270L	SM-G357FZ, SM-G357FZ
Price	About 130 EUR	About 200 EUR
SAR	0.67 W/kg (head) 0.45 W/kg (body)	1.45 W/kg (head) 1.38 W/kg (body)
SAR EU	0.47 W/kg (head) 0.35 W/kg (body)	0.64 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body)

Tests
Battery life	Endurance rating 34h	-
Camera	Photo / Video	-
Display	Contrast ratio: 879:1 (nominal) / 1.622:1 (sunlight)	-
Loudspeaker	Voice 66dB / Noise 62dB / Ring 66dB	-

Samsung Galaxy Ace 3

Excellent battery life
Good sunlight display contrast
Compact and lightweight

Outdated processor
Limited storage
No LTE connectivity

Samsung Galaxy Ace Style LTE G357

Faster quad-core processor
LTE connectivity
More modern Android experience
Likely slightly better camera

Shorter battery life than Ace 3
Limited storage
Display resolution details unavailable

Display Comparison

Both phones feature similar display technology, likely LCD. The Ace 3's contrast ratio is impressive, especially in sunlight (1.622:1), suggesting good outdoor visibility. However, the Ace Style LTE likely has a slightly higher resolution, contributing to a sharper image, though specific resolution details are unavailable. Overall, display quality is comparable, with a slight edge to the Ace Style LTE.

Camera Comparison

Camera specifications are limited for both devices. Both phones feature Photo/Video capabilities. Given the newer chipset in the Ace Style LTE, it's likely to offer slightly improved image processing and potentially better low-light performance, but the difference is likely marginal. Expect decent, but not exceptional, camera quality from both.

Performance

This is where the Ace Style LTE shines. Its quad-core Cortex-A53 processor significantly outperforms the Ace 3's dual-core options (Cortex-A9 or Krait). Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading, and a more responsive user experience on the Ace Style LTE. The Snapdragon 410 chipset is also more modern and efficient.

Battery Life

The Ace 3 holds a significant advantage in battery life, boasting an endurance rating of 34 hours. The Ace Style LTE's battery capacity is likely smaller, resulting in shorter usage times. If battery longevity is your top priority, the Ace 3 is the clear winner.

Buying Guide

The Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 is a good option for users prioritizing maximum battery life and are comfortable with a slightly older processor. The Samsung Galaxy Ace Style LTE is ideal for those needing faster performance, LTE connectivity, and a more modern Android experience.