Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 vs. Ace S5830I: A Detailed Comparison

Looking back at Samsung's budget offerings, the Galaxy Ace 3 and Ace S5830I represent different eras of mobile technology. Both aimed to provide affordable smartphones, but their capabilities differ significantly. This comparison will help you understand which phone might be more appealing, especially if you're considering a retro purchase or parts.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

The Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 400 chipset, dual-core Krait CPU (in LTE models), and significantly better battery life offer a vastly superior user experience compared to the older, slower Ace S5830I. The Ace S5830I is a relic of a simpler time.

PHONES
Phone Names Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 Samsung Galaxy Ace S5830I
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - all versionsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 900 / 2100 - S7270, S7272HSDPA 900 / 2100
4G bands3, 7, 8, 20 - S7275-
SpeedHSPA 42.2(14.4 - 3G)/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 MbpsHSPA 7.2/0.384 Mbps
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTEGSM / HSPA
 HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 - S7275-
Launch
Announced2013, June. Released 2013, July2011
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued
Body
BuildGlass front, plastic back, plastic frame-
Dimensions121.2 x 62.7 x 9.8 mm (3G) / 121.2 x 62.7 x 10 mm (LTE)112.4 x 59.9 x 11.5 mm (4.43 x 2.36 x 0.45 in)
SIMSingle SIM (Micro-SIM) or Dual SIM (Micro-SIM, dual stand-by)Mini-SIM
Weight115 g (3G) / 119.5 g (LTE) (4.06 oz)113 g (3.99 oz)
Display
Protection-Corning Gorilla Glass
Resolution480 x 800 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~233 ppi density)320 x 480 pixels, 3:2 ratio (~165 ppi density)
Size4.0 inches, 45.5 cm2 (~59.9% screen-to-body ratio)3.5 inches, 36.5 cm2 (~54.2% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeTFTTFT
Platform
CPUDual-core 1.0 GHz Cortex-A9 (3G) / Dual-core 1.2 GHz Krait (LTE)832 MHz
ChipsetBroadcom BCM21664 (3G) / Qualcomm MSM8930 Snapdragon 400 (28 nm) (LTE)Broadcom BCM21553
GPUBroadcom VideoCore IV (3G) / Adreno 305 (LTE)VideoCore IV
OSAndroid 4.2 (Jelly Bean)Android 2.2 (Froyo), TouchWiz UI 3
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXC (dedicated slot)microSDHC (dedicated slot)
Internal4GB 1GB RAM (3G), 8GB 1GB RAM (LTE)158MB
 eMMC 4.5-
Main Camera
FeaturesLED flash, panoramaLED flash
Single5 MP, f/2.6, AF5 MP, AF
Video720p@30fpsYes
Selfie camera
SingleVGA-
 -No
Sound
3.5mm jack YesYes
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker YesYes
Comms
Bluetooth4.0, A2DP3.0, A2DP
NFCYes (LTE model only)-
PositioningGPS, GLONASSGPS, A-GPS
RadioStereo FM radio, RDSStereo FM radio, RDS
USBmicroUSB 2.0microUSB 2.0
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspotWi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, DLNA, hotspot
Features
SensorsAccelerometer, proximity, compassAccelerometer, proximity, compass
Battery
Stand-byUp to 370 h (3G)Up to 640 h (2G) / Up to 420 h (3G)
Talk timeUp to 8 h (3G)Up to 11 h (2G) / Up to 6 h 30 min (3G)
TypeLi-Ion 1800/1500 mAh, removableRemovable Li-Ion 1350 mAh battery
Misc
ColorsBlack, White, Dark RedBlack
ModelsGT-S7272, GT-S7275, GT-S7275R, GT-S720, GT-S7270, GT-S7278, GT-S7270LGT-S5830i
PriceAbout 130 EURAbout 70 EUR
SAR0.67 W/kg (head)     0.45 W/kg (body)-
SAR EU0.47 W/kg (head)     0.35 W/kg (body)0.69 W/kg (head)
Tests
Battery life Endurance rating 34h -
Camera Photo / Video-
Display Contrast ratio: 879:1 (nominal) / 1.622:1 (sunlight)-
Loudspeaker Voice 66dB / Noise 62dB / Ring 66dB -

Samsung Galaxy Ace 3

  • Faster Processor
  • Better Battery Life
  • Superior Display
  • Potentially Better Camera

  • Older Technology
  • Limited App Support (compared to modern phones)

Samsung Galaxy Ace S5830I

  • Very Affordable (if found)
  • Simple and Easy to Use

  • Slow Performance
  • Poor Battery Life
  • Low-Resolution Display
  • Outdated Technology
  • Limited Functionality

Display Comparison

The Ace 3 boasts a superior display with a contrast ratio of 879:1 (nominal) and an impressive 1.622:1 in sunlight, indicating better visibility outdoors. The Ace S5830I's display, while functional, lacks these specifications and likely offers a less vibrant and less readable experience. Screen resolution is also likely higher on the Ace 3.

Camera Comparison

While specific camera details are missing for both, the Ace 3 likely has a more capable camera due to its newer hardware. Expect better image quality, potentially higher resolution photos, and possibly video recording capabilities not available on the Ace S5830I. Both are likely to produce mediocre results by today's standards.

Performance

Performance is where the Ace 3 truly shines. The Snapdragon 400 chipset and dual-core Krait CPU (LTE models) provide a noticeable speed advantage over the Ace S5830I's 832 MHz processor. Expect smoother multitasking and faster app loading on the Ace 3. The Ace S5830I will feel sluggish by modern standards.

Battery Life

The Ace 3's endurance rating of 34 hours significantly surpasses what the Ace S5830I likely offered. Battery technology has improved, and the Ace 3's more efficient chipset contributes to its longer battery life. This is a crucial advantage for daily use.

Buying Guide

The Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 is suitable for users seeking a basic smartphone with decent battery life and a slightly faster processor, perhaps for light tasks or as a secondary device. The Ace S5830I is only recommended for collectors or those needing a very basic phone for calls and texts, understanding its limitations.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Are replacement parts readily available for these phones?
Replacement parts for both phones are increasingly difficult to find, especially for the Ace S5830I. The Ace 3 might have slightly better availability, but sourcing parts will likely require searching online marketplaces or specialized repair shops.
❓ Can I use a modern SIM card in either of these phones?
It depends on the SIM card type. Both phones likely support older 2G/3G SIM cards. 4G LTE support is present in some Ace 3 models, but compatibility with newer 5G SIMs is not guaranteed. Check your carrier's specifications.