The Samsung Galaxy A91 and Realme X50 Pro Player represent interesting points in the Android landscape. The A91, released with the Snapdragon 855, aimed to deliver a flagship experience at a more accessible price. The X50 Pro Player, leveraging the newer Snapdragon 865, pushed the boundaries of performance and charging speed, establishing Realme as a serious contender in the performance segment. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which phone offers the best value today.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Realme X50 Pro Player is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 865 chipset provides a noticeable performance uplift over the A91’s Snapdragon 855, and the significantly faster 65W charging (fully charging in 35 minutes) is a game-changer. While the A91 remains a capable device, the X50 Pro Player offers a more future-proof and convenient experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| | - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | Not announced yet | 2020, May 25. Released 2020, June 01 |
| Status | Cancelled | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Unspecified), glass back (Unspecified), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | - | 159 x 74.2 x 8.9 mm (6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 209 g (7.37 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Unspecified |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ |
| | Always-on display | - |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Adreno 640 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 10, One UI | Android 10, Realme UI |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.3, 119˚, 16mm (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 12mm (ultrawide), 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps (gyro-EIS), 720p@960fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240/960fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, 29mm (standard), 1/3.06", 1.0µm
2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) |
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, NavIC |
| Radio | - | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| | Samsung DeX (desktop experience support)
ANT+ | - |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 45W wired | 65W wired, PD, 100% in 35 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh, non-removable | 4200 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | White, Black | Light Speed Silver, Phantom Black |
| Models | SM-A915F | RMX2072 |
| Price | - | About 350 EUR |
Samsung Galaxy A91
- Potentially more refined Samsung software experience
- Likely excellent color accuracy in display
- May be available at a lower price point
- Older Snapdragon 855 chipset
- Slower 45W charging
- Lacks 5G connectivity
Realme X50 Pro Player
- Faster Snapdragon 865 chipset
- Significantly faster 65W charging (35 min)
- 5G connectivity for future-proofing
- Realme UI may not appeal to all users
- Potentially less refined camera software compared to Samsung
Display Comparison
Context data lacks display specifics for both devices. However, given the A91’s positioning, it likely features a Super AMOLED panel, typical of Samsung’s mid-to-high range offerings. The X50 Pro Player, being geared towards gamers, likely boasts a high refresh rate (90Hz or 120Hz) display, offering smoother visuals. The X50 Pro Player’s display is likely brighter, given its focus on visibility during gaming, and may incorporate features like HDR10+ support. The A91’s display, while likely excellent in color accuracy, will likely fall behind in refresh rate and peak brightness.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is difficult. However, given Samsung’s camera expertise, the A91 likely excels in image processing, particularly in dynamic range and color science. The X50 Pro Player, while potentially lacking Samsung’s software polish, may offer a larger main sensor, allowing for better low-light performance. The inclusion of 5G in the X50 Pro Player could also facilitate faster uploads of high-resolution photos and videos. It’s reasonable to assume both phones feature multi-camera setups, but the X50 Pro Player’s focus on performance suggests a more advanced camera system overall.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Realme X50 Pro Player’s Snapdragon 865 (7nm+) represents a significant architectural leap over the Galaxy A91’s Snapdragon 855 (7nm). The 865 utilizes the newer Cortex-A77 cores, offering improved IPC (Instructions Per Clock) compared to the Kryo 485 cores in the 855. This translates to faster application loading, smoother multitasking, and higher frame rates in games. While both share the same core count (Octa-core), the 865’s architecture is more efficient. The X50 Pro Player also benefits from 5G connectivity, a feature absent in the A91. The 7nm+ node used in the 865 also contributes to better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads.
Battery Life
The A91 features 45W wired charging, which is respectable, but the X50 Pro Player’s 65W charging is a clear advantage. The X50 Pro Player can achieve a 100% charge in just 35 minutes, significantly reducing downtime. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging of the X50 Pro Player effectively mitigates any potential capacity disadvantage. The faster charging is particularly beneficial for gamers and power users who need to quickly replenish their battery during breaks.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Galaxy A91 if you prioritize a familiar Samsung user experience and can find it at a significantly lower price point than the X50 Pro Player. It’s a solid performer for everyday tasks and moderate gaming. Buy the Realme X50 Pro Player if you demand the best possible performance for gaming and demanding applications, and value incredibly fast charging speeds. It’s the clear winner for power users and those who frequently push their phones to the limit.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 865 in the Realme X50 Pro Player offer a noticeable gaming improvement over the Snapdragon 855 in the Galaxy A91?
Yes, the Snapdragon 865 provides a significant performance boost in gaming. The newer Cortex-A77 cores and improved GPU architecture result in higher frame rates, smoother gameplay, and better sustained performance, especially in demanding titles like PUBG and Genshin Impact. The X50 Pro Player is the better choice for serious mobile gamers.
❓ How much faster is the 65W charging on the Realme X50 Pro Player compared to the 45W charging on the Samsung Galaxy A91 in real-world use?
The 65W charging on the X50 Pro Player is substantially faster. It can fully charge the phone in approximately 35 minutes, while the A91’s 45W charging will take considerably longer – likely over an hour. This difference is particularly noticeable for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
❓ Is the 5G connectivity on the Realme X50 Pro Player useful if I don't have 5G coverage in my area?
Even without immediate 5G access, the 5G modem in the X50 Pro Player offers future-proofing. As 5G networks expand, you'll be ready to take advantage of faster speeds. Additionally, the 5G modem often includes improvements in 4G connectivity as well, potentially resulting in better 4G performance even in areas without 5G.
