Samsung Galaxy A73 5G vs Galaxy A72: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Galaxy A73 5G wins thanks to its significantly faster Snapdragon 778G chipset and 5G connectivity. While the A72 boasts impressive battery life, the A73's improved performance and future-proofing make it the better overall choice for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Samsung Galaxy A73 5G | Samsung Galaxy A72 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 17 | 2021, March 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 22 | Available. Released 2021, March 26 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.7 x 76.1 x 7.6 mm (6.44 x 3.00 x 0.30 in) | 165 x 77.4 x 8.4 mm (6.50 x 3.05 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 181 g (6.38 oz) | 203 g (7.16 oz) |
| IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~87.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 107.8 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED Plus, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Adreno 618 |
| OS | Android 12, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 6.1 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, One UI 4.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.4, (telephoto), 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 25W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Gray, Mint, White | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Violet, Awesome Blue |
| Models | SM-A736B, SM-A736B/DS | SM-A725F, SM-A725F/DS, SM-A725M, SM-A725M/DS |
| Price | About 600 EUR | £ 174.89 / € 359.99 |
| SAR | 1.14 W/kg (head) | - |
| SAR EU | 1.28 W/kg (head) 1.42 W/kg (body) | 0.23 W/kg (head) 1.17 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 117h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.4 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 279342 (v8) GeekBench: 6483 (v4.4), 1627 (v5.1) GFXBench: 15fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Samsung Galaxy A73 5G
- Faster Performance (Snapdragon 778G)
- 5G Connectivity
- Modern Chipset
- Likely Improved Camera Processing
- Slightly lower battery life than A72 (potentially)
- 25W Charging (not the fastest)
Samsung Galaxy A72
- Exceptional Battery Life (117h endurance)
- Vibrant Display (825 nits)
- Good Value
- Older Chipset (Snapdragon 720G)
- No 5G
- Slower Performance compared to A73
Display Comparison
The Galaxy A72's display shines with its infinite contrast ratio (nominal) and measured 825 nits brightness, offering excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. The A73 5G likely has a similar quality display, but specific brightness measurements are needed for a definitive comparison. Both feature Super AMOLED technology for vibrant colors and deep blacks.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but the A73 5G likely benefits from software optimizations and potentially a slightly improved sensor. Both offer Photo/Video capabilities. Detailed camera comparisons would require extensive testing, but the A73's newer chipset could contribute to better image processing.
Performance
Here's where the A73 5G pulls ahead. The Snapdragon 778G 5G is a substantial upgrade over the A72's Snapdragon 720G. Expect noticeably faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance on the A73 5G. The A72 is still capable, but the A73 offers a more modern and responsive experience.
Battery Life
The Galaxy A72 holds a slight edge in battery life, boasting an impressive endurance rating of 117 hours. While the A73 5G's battery capacity is similar, the more efficient Snapdragon 778G helps mitigate any potential battery drain. Both phones support 25W wired charging.
Buying Guide
The Samsung Galaxy A73 5G is ideal for users who prioritize performance, 5G connectivity, and a smoother overall experience. The Galaxy A72 is a great option for those primarily focused on long battery life and a vibrant display, and who don't necessarily need 5G.