Samsung Galaxy A71 vs. S10 Lite: A Detailed Comparison of Samsung's Mid-Range and Flagship Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and a brighter display, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 855 chipset provides a significant performance uplift over the A71’s Snapdragon 730, and the 705 nit display offers superior visibility. However, the A71’s longer endurance rating and potentially lower price make it a compelling option for budget-conscious users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Samsung Galaxy A71 | Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019, December 12. Released 2020, January 17 | 2020, January 03 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2020, February 03 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3+), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.6 x 76 x 7.7 mm (6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 in) | 162.5 x 75.6 x 8.1 mm (6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 179 g (6.31 oz) | 186 g (6.56 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3+ |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~87.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 107.8 cm2 (~87.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED Plus, HDR10+ |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 470 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM730 Snapdragon 730 (8 nm) - GlobalQualcomm SDM730 Snapdragon 730G (8 nm) - Philippines | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Adreno 640 |
| OS | Android 10, upgradable to Android 13, One UI 5 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 13, One UI 5 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, Super Steady OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 12mm (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/240fps, 1080p@960fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio (market/region dependent) |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| ANT+ | ANT+ | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 25W wired | 45W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 4500 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4500 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Prism Crush Black, Prism Crush Silver, Prism Crush Blue, Prism Crush Pink | Prism White, Prism Black, Prism Blue |
| Models | SM-A715F, SM-A715F/DS, SM-A715F/DSN, SM-A715F/DSM, SM-A715W, SM-A715X | SM-G770F, SM-G770F/DS, SM-G770F/DSM, SM-G770U1 |
| Price | About 120 EUR | About 380 EUR |
| SAR | 0.98 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) | 0.69 W/kg (head) 0.93 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.51 W/kg (head) 1.56 W/kg (body) | 0.49 W/kg (head) 1.52 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Audio quality | Noise -93.5dB / Crosstalk -92.6dB | Noise -93.7dB / Crosstalk -94.7dB |
| Battery life | Endurance rating 102h | Endurance rating 110h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -29.0 LUFS (Average) | -27.2 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 192 458(v7), 263396 (v8) GeekBench: 7039 (v4.4), 1733 (v5.1) GFXBench: 15fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 370751 (v7), 459497 (v8) GeekBench: 11151 (v4.4), 2732 (v5.1) GFXBench: 56fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Samsung Galaxy A71
- Longer battery endurance (102h)
- More affordable price point
- Acceptable performance for everyday tasks
- Slower processor (Snapdragon 730)
- Dimmer display (515 nits)
- Slower charging (25W)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
- Flagship-level performance (Snapdragon 855)
- Brighter display (705 nits)
- Faster charging (45W)
- Slightly shorter battery endurance (110h)
- Higher price tag
- Potentially more heat under sustained load
Display Comparison
The S10 Lite boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching 705 nits compared to the A71’s 515 nits. This translates to better outdoor visibility, especially in direct sunlight. While both displays share an 'Infinite' contrast ratio (typical for Samsung AMOLED panels), the higher peak brightness of the S10 Lite provides a more dynamic and immersive viewing experience. Both likely utilize similar AMOLED technology, but the S10 Lite’s panel is demonstrably superior in terms of brightness.
Camera Comparison
Both devices feature versatile camera systems capable of capturing both photo and video. However, detailed sensor information is missing. Given the S10 Lite’s positioning closer to the flagship S10 series, it likely benefits from more advanced image processing algorithms and potentially larger sensor sizes, resulting in better low-light performance and dynamic range. The A71, while capable, will likely rely more on software enhancements to compensate for potentially smaller sensors. The absence of specific sensor details makes a definitive comparison challenging, but the S10 Lite’s overall hardware advantage suggests superior image quality.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The S10 Lite’s Snapdragon 855 (7nm) is a flagship-tier processor, featuring an octa-core configuration with a prime core clocked at 2.84 GHz. This is a substantial upgrade over the A71’s Snapdragon 730 (8nm). The 855’s Kryo 485 cores offer a noticeable performance advantage in CPU-intensive tasks and gaming. The 7nm process node of the 855 also contributes to better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads. While both phones likely feature similar RAM configurations, the 855’s superior GPU will deliver a smoother gaming experience.
Battery Life
Despite the S10 Lite’s faster 45W wired charging, the A71 holds a slight edge in endurance, achieving a rating of 102 hours versus the S10 Lite’s 110 hours. This suggests that the A71’s battery optimization and potentially more efficient chipset contribute to longer runtimes. The 45W charging on the S10 Lite will significantly reduce charging times, going from 0-100% much faster than the A71’s 25W charging, but the A71 offers more time between charges.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Galaxy A71 if you prioritize all-day battery life and a lower upfront cost, and don't require the absolute fastest performance for demanding tasks. Buy the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite if you value a brighter, more vibrant display, significantly faster processing speeds for gaming and multitasking, and quicker charging times, even if it means slightly less battery endurance.