The Samsung Galaxy A71 and Realme X50 5G represent distinct approaches to the mid-range 5G market. The A71 prioritizes long-term battery endurance and Samsung’s established ecosystem, while the X50 5G focuses on delivering faster 5G connectivity and quicker charging speeds with a more modern chipset. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the best fit.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day battery life and a familiar interface, the Samsung Galaxy A71 is the better choice. However, users who value faster 5G speeds, quicker charging, and a more modern processor will find the Realme X50 5G a compelling alternative.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, December 12. Released 2020, January 17 | 2020, July 08. Released 2020, July 08 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 163.6 x 76 x 7.7 mm (6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 in) | 163.8 x 75.8 x 8.9 mm (6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 179 g (6.31 oz) | 194 g (6.84 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~87.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.57 inches, 104.2 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 470 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM730 Snapdragon 730 (8 nm) - GlobalQualcomm SDM730 Snapdragon 730G (8 nm) - Philippines | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 10, upgradable to Android 13, One UI 5 | Android 10, Realme UI |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF
12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide)
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.3, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/240fps, 1080p@960fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm
2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) |
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/120fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| | ANT+ | - |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 25W wired | 30W wired, 70% in 30 min |
| Type | Li-Ion 4500 mAh, non-removable | 4200 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Prism Crush Black, Prism Crush Silver, Prism Crush Blue, Prism Crush Pink | Jungle Green, Ice Silver |
| Models | SM-A715F, SM-A715F/DS, SM-A715F/DSN, SM-A715F/DSM, SM-A715W, SM-A715X | RMX2144 |
| Price | About 120 EUR | About 500 EUR |
| SAR | 0.98 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 0.51 W/kg (head) 1.56 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality |
Noise -93.5dB / Crosstalk -92.6dB | - |
| Battery life | Endurance rating 102h | - |
| Camera |
Photo / Video | - |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker |
-29.0 LUFS (Average) | - |
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 192 458(v7), 263396 (v8)
GeekBench: 7039 (v4.4), 1733 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 15fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Samsung Galaxy A71
- Exceptional 102-hour battery endurance
- Familiar Samsung One UI experience
- Bright 515 nit display
- Older Snapdragon 730 chipset
- Slower 25W charging
- Lacks 5G modem
Realme X50 5G
- Faster Snapdragon 765G 5G chipset
- 30W fast charging (70% in 30 min)
- Integrated 5G connectivity
- Battery life likely shorter than A71
- Realme UI may not appeal to all users
- Battery capacity not specified
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A71 boasts a display capable of 515 nits of peak brightness, providing adequate visibility outdoors. While the Realme X50 5G’s display specifications aren’t provided, Realme typically focuses on high refresh rates in this segment, which the A71 lacks. The A71’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio suggests a typical AMOLED panel, offering deep blacks. The absence of refresh rate data for the X50 5G means it’s difficult to assess its smoothness compared to the A71, but it’s likely a key differentiator.
Camera Comparison
Both devices feature a 'Photo / Video' camera setup, but detailed sensor information is missing. Given the market positioning, it’s reasonable to assume the X50 5G might prioritize computational photography leveraging the more powerful processor. Without specific details on sensor size or aperture, it’s difficult to definitively assess image quality. However, the Snapdragon 765G’s image signal processor (ISP) is likely more advanced, potentially leading to better low-light performance and faster image processing on the Realme X50 5G.
Performance
The Realme X50 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (7nm) offers a clear architectural advantage over the Samsung Galaxy A71’s Snapdragon 730 (8nm). The 765G’s Kryo 475 Prime core, clocked at 2.4 GHz, provides a performance boost over the A71’s 2.2 GHz Kryo 470 Gold cores. The 7nm process node of the 765G also contributes to improved power efficiency. This translates to faster app loading times and smoother multitasking on the X50 5G, particularly noticeable in graphically intensive games. The integrated 5G modem in the 765G is also a significant advantage for future-proofing.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy A71 shines with an impressive 102-hour endurance rating, indicating exceptional battery life. While the Realme X50 5G’s battery capacity isn’t specified, its 30W wired charging (70% in 30 minutes) offers a significant advantage over the A71’s 25W charging. The faster charging speed mitigates any potential battery capacity deficit, allowing users to quickly top up their device. The A71’s endurance rating suggests it can comfortably last a full day, even with moderate to heavy usage, while the X50 5G relies on its faster charging to address potential battery concerns.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Galaxy A71 if you need exceptional battery life, a well-established brand reputation, and a user experience that prioritizes simplicity and longevity. Buy the Realme X50 5G if you prefer faster 5G connectivity, quicker 30W charging, and a more powerful processor for demanding tasks and gaming, even if it means slightly less battery endurance.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 730G in the Galaxy A71 struggle with demanding games like PUBG?
While the Snapdragon 730G is a capable chipset, it may require reduced graphics settings for a consistently smooth experience in demanding games like PUBG. The Realme X50 5G’s Snapdragon 765G offers a performance advantage, allowing for higher graphics settings and potentially more stable frame rates.
❓ How much faster is the 30W charging on the Realme X50 5G compared to the A71 in real-world use?
The Realme X50 5G can reach 70% charge in just 30 minutes, while the A71’s 25W charging will take considerably longer. This means you can quickly top up the X50 5G during short breaks, making it ideal for users who are frequently on the go.
❓ Is the lack of a specified battery capacity on the Realme X50 5G a major concern?
While the capacity isn't listed, the 30W fast charging significantly mitigates concerns about battery life. The Snapdragon 765G's improved power efficiency also helps to offset any potential capacity difference compared to the A71.
