Samsung Galaxy A71 5G vs. Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G: Which 5G Mid-Ranger Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and efficiency, the Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G is the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 780G chipset, built on a 5nm process, provides a noticeable performance advantage and better thermal management compared to the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G’s Exynos 980. While the A71 5G offers a familiar Samsung experience, the Mi 11 Lite 5G delivers more bang for your buck.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Samsung Galaxy A71 5G | Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - SM-A716B | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - SM-A716B | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 41, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - SM-A716B | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| 2, 5, 41, 66, 71 mmWave/Sub6 - SM-A716U | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, April 08 | 2021, March 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2020, June 15 | Available. Released 2021, April 16 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), glass back |
| Dimensions | 162.5 x 75.5 x 8.1 mm (6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 in) | 160.5 x 75.7 x 6.8 mm (6.32 x 2.98 x 0.27 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 185 g (6.53 oz) | 159 g (5.61 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~88.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED, 1B colors, HDR10+, 90Hz, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A77 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 670 & 3x2.2 GHz Kryo 670 & 4x1.90 GHz Kryo 670) |
| Chipset | Exynos 980 (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM7350-AB Snapdragon 780G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 | Adreno 642 |
| OS | Android 10, upgradable to Android 13, One UI 5 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | - | 20 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro), AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/240fps, 1080p@960fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 20 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| ANT+ | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 25W wired | 33W wired, PD3.0, QC4 |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4250 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Prism Cube Black, Prism Cube Sliver, Prism Cube Blue | Truffle Black, Mint Green, Citrus Yellow |
| Models | SM-A716F, SM-A716F/DS, SM-A716F/DSN, SM-A7160, SM-A716B/DS, SM-A716U, SM-A716B, SM-A716U1 | M2101K9G, M2101K9C, M2101K9R |
| Price | About 120 EUR | About 120 EUR |
| SAR | 0.69 W/kg (head) 1.11 W/kg (body) | 1.03 W/kg (head) 1.06 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 1.24 W/kg (head) 1.53 W/kg (body) | 0.56 W/kg (head) 0.89 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 106h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -23.6 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 465534 (v8) | 522490 (v9) GeekBench: 2909 (v5.1) GFXBench: 35fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G
- Familiar Samsung One UI experience
- Larger display size for media consumption
- Established Samsung ecosystem integration
- Less efficient Exynos 980 chipset
- Slower 25W charging
- Potentially lower peak display brightness
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
- More powerful and efficient Snapdragon 780G
- Faster 33W charging with PD3.0/QC4
- Brighter and sharper display
- MIUI software may not appeal to all users
- Smaller display size compared to A71 5G
- Less brand recognition in some markets
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 846 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the A71 5G. This higher peak brightness translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While both displays have an 'infinite' contrast ratio (typical for OLED/AMOLED panels), the Mi 11 Lite 5G’s smaller 6.55-inch panel versus the A71 5G’s larger size contributes to a higher pixel density, resulting in a sharper image. The A71 5G’s larger size may appeal to media consumers, but the Mi 11 Lite 5G’s superior brightness and sharpness offer a more visually pleasing experience overall.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is lacking for the A71 5G. The Mi 11 Lite 5G likely benefits from Qualcomm’s image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 780G, offering improved image processing and noise reduction. Without specific sensor details for the A71 5G, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment, but the Mi 11 Lite 5G’s chipset advantage suggests superior image quality, particularly in low-light conditions. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on the Mi 11 Lite 5G (likely on the main sensor) would further enhance its camera performance.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G (5nm) is a clear upgrade over the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G’s Exynos 980 (8nm). The 5nm fabrication process of the Snapdragon 780G results in significantly improved power efficiency and thermal performance. The Snapdragon 780G’s CPU configuration – 1x2.4 GHz Kryo 670, 3x2.2 GHz Kryo 670, and 4x1.90 GHz Kryo 670 – offers a more balanced and efficient architecture than the Exynos 980’s 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A77 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex A55. This translates to smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better sustained performance during gaming. While both phones likely feature adequate RAM, the Snapdragon 780G’s inherent efficiency will minimize throttling under sustained load.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 106 hours, suggesting comparable battery life despite the A71 5G’s unspecified battery capacity. However, the Mi 11 Lite 5G’s 33W wired charging with PD3.0 and QC4 support is significantly faster than the A71 5G’s 25W charging. This means the Mi 11 Lite 5G can be topped up much quicker, minimizing downtime. The Snapdragon 780G’s superior power efficiency also contributes to longer real-world usage, potentially offsetting any capacity difference.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G if you prioritize a larger display and are deeply embedded in the Samsung ecosystem, valuing features like Samsung Pay and One UI. Buy the Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G if you prefer a more compact, lightweight design coupled with superior processing power for gaming and demanding applications, and appreciate a cleaner Android experience with MIUI.