Choosing between Samsung's Galaxy A series can be tough. Both the A71 5G UW and A53 5G offer compelling features at mid-range prices, but cater to slightly different needs. This comprehensive comparison will help you decide which phone is the right fit for you.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The A53 5G generally edges out the A71 5G UW thanks to its more efficient chipset, brighter display, and slightly more modern design. However, the A71 5G UW's Snapdragon 765G still provides solid performance, especially for those needing UW band support.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 13, 20, 28, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 14, 20, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66 - SM-A536U |
| 5G bands | 260, 261 SA/NSA/mmWave | 2, 5, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - SM-A536U |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 2, 5, 48, 66, 77, 78, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - SM-A536V |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, July 07 | 2022, March 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2020, July 16 | Available. Released 2022, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 162.8 x 75.7 x 8.4 mm (6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) | 159.6 x 74.8 x 8.1 mm (6.28 x 2.94 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM (pre-installed) | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| | - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~87.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~85.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 620 | Mali-G68 |
| OS | Android 10, One UI 2.1 | Android 12, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 8 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF
12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide)
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7X", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/240fps, 1080p@960fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (market/region dependent) |
| | ANT+ | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 25W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Prism Bricks Black | Black, White, Blue, Peach |
| Models | SM-A716V | SM-A536B, SM-A536B/DS, SM-A536U, SM-A536U1, SM-A5360, SM-A536E, SM-A536E/DS, SM-A536V, SM-A536W, SM-A536N, SM-S536DL |
| Price | - | $ 151.42 / £ 185.00 / € 169.14 |
| SAR | 0.50 W/kg (head) 0.78 W/kg (body) | 0.75 W/kg (head) 1.58 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.89 W/kg (head) 1.60 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 113h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.5 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 329802 (v8), 379313 (v9)
GeekBench: 1891 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 19fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
| OUR TESTS |
|---|
| Battery (old) | - | Endurance rating 113h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | 830 nits max brightness (measured) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.5 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 329802 (v8), 379313 (v9)
GeekBench: 1891 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 19fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW
- Larger 6.7-inch display
- UW Band Support
- Solid Performance
- Good Value
- Older Chipset
- Lower Brightness Display
- Slower Charging (compared to potential competitors)
Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
- Brighter Display
- More Efficient Chipset
- Improved Camera Performance
- Modern Design
- Smaller Display (6.5 inches)
- No UW Band Support
- 25W Charging
Display Comparison
The A53 5G boasts a significant advantage with its measured 830 nits max brightness, making it much easier to view outdoors. While the A71 5G UW has a large 6.7-inch display, the A53 5G's 'Infinite' contrast ratio (nominal) suggests deeper blacks and better overall image quality. Both offer FHD+ resolution, but the A53's brightness is a key differentiator.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems, but the A53 5G is generally considered to have a slight edge. While specific camera specs are not provided, the A53 5G's newer image processing capabilities and potentially improved sensor technology contribute to better image quality, especially in low light. Both offer Photo/Video capabilities.
Performance
The A53 5G's Exynos 1280 (5nm) generally outperforms the A71 5G UW's Snapdragon 765G (7nm) in efficiency and sustained performance. While the A71 5G UW's CPU configuration is decent, the Exynos 1280's newer architecture and smaller process node provide a noticeable boost in everyday tasks and gaming. The A71 5G UW does offer UW band support, a potential advantage for some users.
Battery Life
Both phones share a 25W wired charging speed. The A53 5G boasts an endurance rating of 113h, suggesting superior battery efficiency thanks to its more modern chipset. The A71 5G UW's battery life is likely still respectable, but not as impressive as the A53 5G.
Buying Guide
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is ideal for users prioritizing UW band compatibility and a larger display. The A53 5G is a better choice for those seeking a brighter screen, improved efficiency, and a more modern design with a focus on camera capabilities.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the A71 5G UW support 5G?
Yes, the A71 5G UW supports 5G connectivity, including Ultra Wideband (UW) frequencies.
❓ Is the A53 5G waterproof?
The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G has an IP67 rating, meaning it's dust and water-resistant.