Samsung Galaxy A60 vs A53 5G: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G is the clear winner. Its superior chipset, brighter display, faster charging, and significantly longer battery life outweigh the A60's impressive contrast ratio. While the A60 was a solid phone in its time, the A53 5G offers a substantial upgrade.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Samsung Galaxy A60 | Samsung Galaxy A53 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 14, 20, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66 - SM-A536U |
| 5G bands | - | 2, 5, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - SM-A536U |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 400/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - SM-A606Y/DS | 2, 5, 48, 66, 77, 78, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - SM-A536V | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019, April. Released 2019, June | 2022, March 17 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2022, March 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 155.3 x 73.9 x 7.9 mm (6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 in) | 159.6 x 74.8 x 8.1 mm (6.28 x 2.94 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 168 g (5.93 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.3 inches, 97.4 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~85.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | PLS LCD | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 460 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM675 Snapdragon 675 (11 nm) | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 612 | Mali-G68 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 11, One UI 3.0 | Android 12, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 8 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| eMMC 5.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7X", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 32 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 12mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (market/region dependent) |
| ANT+ Bixby natural language commands and dictation | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 3500 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Daybreak Black, Seawater Blue, Cocktail Orange, Peach Mist, Gradient Red | Black, White, Blue, Peach |
| Models | SM-A606F, SM-A6060, SM-A606Y | SM-A536B, SM-A536B/DS, SM-A536U, SM-A536U1, SM-A5360, SM-A536E, SM-A536E/DS, SM-A536V, SM-A536W, SM-A536N, SM-S536DL |
| Price | About 290 EUR | $ 151.42 / £ 185.00 / € 169.14 |
| SAR | - | 0.75 W/kg (head) 1.58 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.27 W/kg (head) 1.17 W/kg (body) | 0.89 W/kg (head) 1.60 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 86h | Endurance rating 113h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 1314:1 | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -33.6 LUFS (Poor) | -26.5 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 170102 (v7), 209933 (v8) GeekBench: 6582 (v4.4), 1602 (v5.1) GFXBench: 7.3fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 329802 (v8), 379313 (v9) GeekBench: 1891 (v5.1) GFXBench: 19fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Samsung Galaxy A60
- High contrast ratio display
- Good value (if found at a low price)
- Older chipset
- Slower charging
- Shorter battery life
- Likely less advanced camera
Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
- Powerful Exynos 1280 chipset
- Brighter display
- Longer battery life
- Faster 25W charging
- 5G connectivity
- Likely better camera system
- Potentially higher price
Display Comparison
The Galaxy A53 5G boasts a brighter display at 830 nits compared to the A60's 690 nits, making it more visible outdoors. While the A60 has a remarkable 1314:1 contrast ratio, the A53 5G's 'infinite' contrast (nominal) still delivers excellent image quality. The A53 5G also likely has a more modern display technology (e.g., AMOLED vs. LCD, though this is not explicitly stated in the provided specs).
Camera Comparison
While both phones are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, the A53 5G is expected to have a more advanced camera system. The A53 5G likely features a higher resolution main sensor and potentially additional lenses (ultrawide, macro, depth) for greater versatility. Image processing capabilities are also likely superior on the A53 5G.
Performance
The A53 5G's Exynos 1280 (5nm) chipset is a significant upgrade over the A60's Snapdragon 675 (11nm). The newer chipset offers considerably faster processing speeds and improved efficiency, resulting in smoother multitasking and gaming. The Cortex-A78 cores in the A53 5G are also more powerful than the Kryo 460 cores in the A60.
Battery Life
The A53 5G takes a commanding lead in battery life, with an endurance rating of 113h compared to the A60's 86h. This translates to significantly longer usage between charges. The A53 5G also supports 25W wired charging, a faster charging speed than the A60's 15W.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Samsung Galaxy A60? Those seeking a budget-friendly option and prioritizing a high contrast display. Who should buy the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G? Anyone wanting a modern 5G phone with excellent performance, a vibrant display, a versatile camera system, and long-lasting battery life.