Samsung Galaxy A56 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+: Which Mid-Range Champion Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing longevity and a balanced experience, the Samsung Galaxy A56 emerges as the winner. Its exceptional 44:34h battery endurance and 2000 charge cycles significantly outweigh the Redmi Note 13 Pro+'s faster charging, especially considering the performance gap isn't substantial enough to justify the trade-off.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Samsung Galaxy A56 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA- International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, March 02 | 2023, September 21 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, March 10 | Available. Released 2023, September 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus+), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus+), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 162.2 x 77.5 x 7.4 mm (6.39 x 3.05 x 0.29 in) | 161.4 x 74.2 x 8.9 mm (6.35 x 2.92 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 198 g (6.98 oz) | 199 g or 204.5 g (7.02 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+, Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~385 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 110.2 cm2 (~87.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (HBM), 1900 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A520) | Octa-core (2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Exynos 1580 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 7200 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Xclipse 540 | Mali-G610 MC4 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 6 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Best Face, LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) | 200 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@24/30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 12 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, 1080p@60fps (regional availability), 10-bit HDR | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 65% in 30 min, 100% in 68 min | 120W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 19 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Pink, Olive, Graphite, Lightgray | Midnight Black (Fushion Black), Moonlight White (Fushion White), Aurora Purple, Fushion Purple, Camo Green |
| Models | SM-A566V, SM-A566B, SM-A566B/DS, SM-A566E, SM-A566E/DS, SM-A5660, SM-A566U, SM-A566U1, SM-A566W, SM-A566S | 23090RA98C, 23090RA98G, 23090RA98I |
| Price | € 286.99 / $ 308.29 / £ 249.00 / ₹ 38,999 | $ 299.98 / £ 299.00 / € 208.98 / ₹ 24,999 |
| SAR | 1.32 W/kg (head) | 1.09 W/kg (head) 0.85 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.61 W/kg (head) 1.05 W/kg (body) | 0.98 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 44:34h endurance, 2000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Samsung Galaxy A56
- Exceptional battery life (44:34h endurance)
- Long-term battery health (2000 charge cycles)
- Potentially superior CPU efficiency
- Slower charging speed (68 minutes)
- Potentially less powerful GPU for gaming
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+
- Blazing-fast 120W charging (19 minutes)
- Likely stronger GPU performance
- Slightly brighter display
- Shorter battery life (10:38h endurance)
- Fewer charge cycles expected
Display Comparison
Both the Galaxy A56 and Redmi Note 13 Pro+ boast bright displays, with the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ edging out the A56 in peak brightness at 1283 nits versus 1213 nits. While the difference is measurable, both screens will be perfectly usable outdoors. Neither specification details refresh rates or panel technology (LTPO), so we must assume standard AMOLED panels. The slightly higher brightness of the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ may provide a marginal benefit in direct sunlight, but the A56’s color accuracy, typical of Samsung displays, is likely superior.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. However, the market positioning suggests the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ likely features a higher resolution main sensor. Both phones will likely include standard wide, ultrawide, and macro lenses, but the quality of image processing will be crucial. Samsung’s image processing typically prioritizes vibrant colors and detail enhancement, while Xiaomi often aims for a more natural look. The absence of OIS details for either phone suggests image stabilization may be limited, particularly in low-light conditions.
Performance
The chipset choice is a key differentiator. The Samsung Galaxy A56 utilizes the Exynos 1580 (4nm), featuring a tri-cluster configuration with a Cortex-A720 prime core clocked at 2.9 GHz. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ employs the MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra (4nm), with a dual-core setup featuring Cortex-A715 cores at 2.8 GHz. While clock speeds are comparable, the Cortex-A720 core in the Exynos 1580 is architecturally newer and generally more efficient than the A715. However, the Dimensity 7200 Ultra’s GPU is likely to offer a more substantial gaming performance advantage. The A56’s CPU configuration, with more efficiency cores, may translate to better multi-tasking and sustained performance under lighter loads.
Battery Life
Battery life is where the Galaxy A56 truly shines. Its 44:34h endurance score, coupled with a remarkable 2000 charge cycles, indicates exceptional longevity. The Redmi Note 13 Pro+ achieves a respectable 10:38h active use score, but falls short of the A56. The Redmi Note 13 Pro+ compensates with its 120W charging, achieving a full charge in just 19 minutes, compared to the A56’s 68 minutes. This difference is significant for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly, but the A56’s superior endurance reduces the need for frequent charging.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Galaxy A56 if you need a phone that will reliably last through a full day of heavy use and beyond, and value long-term battery health with its 2000 charge cycle rating. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ if you prioritize the absolute fastest charging speeds available – getting from 0 to 100% in just 19 minutes – and are willing to accept slightly shorter battery life and potentially more frequent charging cycles.