Samsung Galaxy A56 vs A55: A Detailed Comparison of Samsung's Mid-Range Powerhouses

Samsung's Galaxy A series consistently delivers compelling value, but choosing between the latest iteration and its predecessor can be tricky. The Galaxy A56 introduces the new Exynos 1580 chipset and a brighter display, while the A55 boasts a slightly longer active use battery life. This comparison dissects the key differences to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For most users, the Samsung Galaxy A56 emerges as the better choice. Its significantly brighter 1213 nit display and the newer, potentially more efficient Exynos 1580 chipset offer a tangible upgrade, especially for outdoor visibility and sustained performance. The faster 45W charging is also a considerable benefit.

PHONES
Phone Names Samsung Galaxy A56 Samsung Galaxy A55
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 661, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66
5G bands1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub61, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5GGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G
Launch
Announced2025, March 022024, March 11
StatusAvailable. Released 2025, March 10Available. Released 2024, March 15
Body
BuildGlass front (Gorilla Glass Victus+), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus+), aluminum frameGlass front (Gorilla Glass Victus+), glass back (Gorilla Glass), aluminum frame
Dimensions162.2 x 77.5 x 7.4 mm (6.39 x 3.05 x 0.29 in)161.1 x 77.4 x 8.2 mm (6.34 x 3.05 x 0.32 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)· Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)
Weight198 g (6.98 oz)213 g (7.51 oz)
Display
ProtectionCorning Gorilla Glass Victus+, Mohs level 5Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+
Resolution1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~385 ppi density)1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~390 ppi density)
Size6.7 inches, 110.2 cm2 (~87.7% screen-to-body ratio)6.6 inches, 106.9 cm2 (~85.8% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeSuper AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (HBM), 1900 nits (peak)Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (1x2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A520)Octa-core (4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
ChipsetExynos 1580 (4 nm)Exynos 1480 (4 nm)
GPUXclipse 540Xclipse 530
OSAndroid 15, up to 6 major Android upgrades, One UI 7Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 6.1
Memory
Card slotNomicroSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)
Internal128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM
Main Camera
FeaturesBest Face, LED flash, panorama, HDRLED flash, panorama, HDR
Triple50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro)50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro)
Video4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS
Selfie camera
Single12 MP, f/2.2, (wide)32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm
Video4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, 1080p@60fps (regional availability), 10-bit HDR4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps
Sound
35mm jackNoNo
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakersYes, with stereo speakers
Comms
Bluetooth5.3, A2DP, LE5.3, A2DP, LE
NFCYes (market/region dependent)Yes (market/region dependent)
PositioningGPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSSGPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS
RadioNoNo
USBUSB Type-C 2.0, OTGUSB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass
Battery
Charging45W wired, 65% in 30 min, 100% in 68 min25W wired
Type5000 mAhLi-Ion 5000 mAh
Misc
ColorsPink, Olive, Graphite, LightgrayIceblue, Lilac, Navy, Lemon
ModelsSM-A566V, SM-A566B, SM-A566B/DS, SM-A566E, SM-A566E/DS, SM-A5660, SM-A566U, SM-A566U1, SM-A566W, SM-A566SSM-A556V, SM-A556B, SM-A556B/DS, SM-A556E, SM-A556E/DS, SM-A5560
Price€ 286.99 / $ 308.29 / £ 249.00 / ₹ 38,999$ 324.99 / £ 251.50 / € 319.99 / ₹ 23,998
SAR1.32 W/kg (head)-
SAR EU0.61 W/kg (head)     1.05 W/kg (body)0.68 W/kg (head)     1.04 W/kg (body)
EU LABEL
Battery44:34h endurance, 2000 cycles-
EnergyClass B-
Free fallClass A (270 falls)-
RepairabilityClass C-

Samsung Galaxy A56

  • Brighter display for better outdoor visibility
  • Faster 45W charging for quicker top-ups
  • Newer Exynos 1580 chipset with potentially improved performance

  • Slightly shorter active use battery life (12:08h vs 13:27h)
  • Potential for initial software bugs with a newer model

Samsung Galaxy A55

  • Longer active use battery life
  • More established software platform
  • Potentially lower price point (as an older model)

  • Dimmer display, less visible in sunlight
  • Slower 25W charging
  • Older Exynos 1480 chipset

Display Comparison

The Galaxy A56 boasts a notably brighter display, reaching a measured 1213 nits compared to the A55’s 1010 nits. This 20% increase in peak brightness translates to significantly improved visibility in direct sunlight. While both likely utilize AMOLED panels, the A56’s higher brightness suggests potential improvements in panel technology or backlighting. We lack data on refresh rates or PWM dimming, but the A56’s brighter panel is a clear win for outdoor users and those who prefer vibrant visuals. The A55's lower brightness isn't *bad*, but the A56 offers a more premium viewing experience.

Camera Comparison

Unfortunately, the provided data doesn’t detail camera specifications beyond the chipsets. Given Samsung’s typical approach, both phones likely feature similar camera setups, potentially with minor software tweaks. The Exynos 1580 in the A56 *may* offer slightly improved image signal processing capabilities, leading to better low-light performance or faster image processing. However, without sensor size, aperture, or OIS details, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner. We can assume both will offer competent mid-range camera performance, but the A56 has a slight edge due to the newer ISP.

Performance

The core difference lies in the chipsets: the A56 features the Exynos 1580 (4nm) versus the A55’s Exynos 1480 (4nm). While both are built on the same 4nm process, the A56’s CPU configuration – a mix of Cortex-A720 and A520 cores – represents a generational leap over the A55’s Cortex-A78 and A55 cores. The A720 cores in the A56 are expected to deliver higher single-core performance, crucial for responsive app launches and smoother multitasking. The A55’s older A78 cores, while still capable, will likely fall behind in demanding tasks. The A56’s architecture suggests better efficiency, potentially mitigating any battery life impact from the brighter display.

Battery Life

The Galaxy A55 holds a slight edge in active use battery life, achieving 13:27 hours compared to the A56’s 12:08 hours. However, the A56 compensates with significantly faster charging: 45W wired, reaching 65% in 30 minutes and 100% in 68 minutes, versus the A55’s 25W charging. The A56 also boasts a claimed 2000 charge cycles, suggesting improved long-term battery health. The faster charging and potentially more efficient Exynos 1580 could negate the A55’s initial battery life advantage for many users, as quick top-ups become more convenient.

Buying Guide

Buy the Samsung Galaxy A56 if you prioritize display brightness, faster charging speeds, and future-proofing with the newer Exynos 1580 processor. This phone is ideal for media consumption outdoors and users who demand quicker top-ups. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A55 if maximizing active use battery life is paramount and you prefer a slightly more established platform, potentially benefiting from more optimized software at launch.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the Exynos 1580 chip in the A56 overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
While we haven't conducted extensive thermal testing, the 4nm process and newer CPU architecture of the Exynos 1580 suggest improved thermal efficiency compared to the A55's Exynos 1480. This should translate to less throttling during demanding tasks like gaming, but sustained performance will still depend on Samsung's thermal management implementation.
❓ How significant is the difference in charging speed between the A56's 45W and the A55's 25W charging?
The difference is substantial. The A56 can reach 65% charge in just 30 minutes and fully charge in 68 minutes, while the A55's 25W charging will take considerably longer. This makes the A56 a much more convenient option for users who frequently need to quickly top up their battery.
❓ Is the 2000 charge cycle claim for the A56's battery realistic, and what does it mean for long-term battery health?
2000 charge cycles is a significant claim, suggesting Samsung has implemented battery health management technologies to preserve capacity over time. It means the battery is designed to retain a substantial portion of its original capacity after being fully charged and discharged 2000 times, potentially extending the usable lifespan of the device.