Samsung Galaxy A56 vs. Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024): Which Mid-Range Phone Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Samsung Galaxy A56 emerges as the stronger choice. Its brighter display, faster 45W charging, and potentially more refined software experience outweigh the Moto G Stylus 5G’s slightly longer active use score and stylus functionality. However, stylus users will find the Moto G a compelling alternative.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Samsung Galaxy A56 | Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 12, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, March 02 | 2024, May 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, March 10 | Available. Released 2024, May 30 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus+), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus+), aluminum frame | Glass front, silicone polymer (eco leather) back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 162.2 x 77.5 x 7.4 mm (6.39 x 3.05 x 0.29 in) | 162.6 x 74.8 x 8.3 mm (6.40 x 2.94 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 198 g (6.98 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+, Mohs level 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~385 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 110.2 cm2 (~87.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 107.3 cm2 (~88.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (HBM), 1900 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A520) | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Exynos 1580 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Xclipse 540 | Adreno 710 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 6 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 | Android 14, up to 1 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.57", 1.0µm, dual-pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Features | Best Face, LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 12 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 25mm (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, 1080p@60fps (regional availability), 10-bit HDR | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | FM radio (market/region dependent) |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 65% in 30 min, 100% in 68 min | 30W wired 15W wireless |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Pink, Olive, Graphite, Lightgray | Caramel Latte, Scarlet Wave |
| Models | SM-A566V, SM-A566B, SM-A566B/DS, SM-A566E, SM-A566E/DS, SM-A5660, SM-A566U, SM-A566U1, SM-A566W, SM-A566S | XT2419-2, XT2419-1, XT2419 |
| Price | € 286.99 / $ 308.29 / £ 249.00 / ₹ 38,999 | $ 68.66 / C$ 202.25 |
| SAR | 1.32 W/kg (head) | - |
| SAR EU | 0.61 W/kg (head) 1.05 W/kg (body) | - |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 44:34h endurance, 2000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Samsung Galaxy A56
- Faster 45W charging significantly reduces downtime.
- Potentially more powerful Exynos 1580 chipset for demanding tasks.
- Claimed 2000 battery charge cycles for long-term reliability.
- Lower peak display brightness compared to the Moto G Stylus 5G.
- Lacks the integrated stylus functionality.
Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024)
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility.
- Integrated stylus for note-taking and creative tasks.
- 15W wireless charging adds convenience.
- Slower 30W wired charging.
- Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 may offer less peak performance than the Exynos 1580.
Display Comparison
The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) boasts a brighter display, reaching 1387 nits measured, compared to the Samsung Galaxy A56’s 1213 nits. This translates to better visibility under direct sunlight. While both utilize 4nm chipsets, the display brightness difference is significant for outdoor use. We lack panel technology details (LTPO, AMOLED) for both, but the higher peak brightness of the Motorola gives it an edge for users who spend considerable time outdoors. Bezels appear comparable based on available imagery, and color accuracy data is currently unavailable, making brightness the key differentiator.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are limited, but the focus should be on the main sensors. Without specific sensor sizes, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device is unknown, but crucial for low-light photography. We can safely ignore the likely inclusion of 2MP macro cameras on both phones, as their utility is minimal. Image processing styles will likely differ – Samsung typically favors vibrant, saturated colors, while Motorola tends towards a more natural look. Further analysis requires sample images.
Performance
Under the hood, the Samsung Galaxy A56 features the Exynos 1580 (4nm), an octa-core processor with a mix of Cortex-A720 and A520 cores, peaking at 2.9 GHz. The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) utilizes the Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4nm), employing Cortex-A78 and A55 cores, maxing out at 2.2 GHz. While clock speed isn’t everything, the A720 cores in the Exynos are architecturally more advanced than the A78 cores in the Snapdragon, suggesting a potential advantage in single-core performance. However, the Snapdragon’s core configuration may offer better sustained multi-core performance. Both phones utilize a 4nm process, indicating similar thermal efficiency, but real-world testing is needed to determine throttling behavior. RAM details are missing, but LPDDR5x would be expected in this segment.
Battery Life
The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) achieves a slightly longer active use score of 12:43h, compared to the Samsung Galaxy A56’s 12:08h. However, the A56 compensates with significantly faster charging: 45W wired, reaching 65% in 30 minutes and 100% in 68 minutes, versus the Moto G’s 30W wired and the addition of 15W wireless charging. The A56 also boasts a claimed 2000 charge cycles, suggesting greater long-term battery health. While the Moto G offers a slight edge in endurance, the A56’s charging speed and cycle count are compelling advantages.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Galaxy A56 if you prioritize a vibrant display, faster charging speeds, and a potentially smoother software experience. It’s ideal for media consumption, casual gaming, and users who want a well-rounded smartphone. Buy the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) if you frequently take notes, sketch, or navigate with a stylus, and if maximizing battery life is paramount. It’s a practical choice for professionals and students who value productivity on the go.