Samsung Galaxy A53 5G vs Galaxy A71: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Galaxy A53 5G edges out the A71 thanks to its brighter display, more modern chipset, and slightly better battery endurance. While the A71 boasts a larger screen, the A53 5G's overall improvements make it the more appealing choice for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Samsung Galaxy A53 5G | Samsung Galaxy A71 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 14, 20, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66 - SM-A536U | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 2, 5, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - SM-A536U | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| 2, 5, 48, 66, 77, 78, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - SM-A536V | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 17 | 2019, December 12. Released 2020, January 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 24 | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 159.6 x 74.8 x 8.1 mm (6.28 x 2.94 x 0.32 in) | 163.6 x 76 x 7.7 mm (6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 189 g (6.67 oz) | 179 g (6.31 oz) |
| IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~85.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~87.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) | Super AMOLED Plus |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 470 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver) |
| Chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) | Qualcomm SDM730 Snapdragon 730 (8 nm) - GlobalQualcomm SDM730 Snapdragon 730G (8 nm) - Philippines |
| GPU | Mali-G68 | Adreno 618 |
| OS | Android 12, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 8 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 13, One UI 5 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7X", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/240fps, 1080p@960fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (market/region dependent) | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Virtual proximity sensing | ANT+ | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 25W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 4500 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Blue, Peach | Prism Crush Black, Prism Crush Silver, Prism Crush Blue, Prism Crush Pink |
| Models | SM-A536B, SM-A536B/DS, SM-A536U, SM-A536U1, SM-A5360, SM-A536E, SM-A536E/DS, SM-A536V, SM-A536W, SM-A536N, SM-S536DL | SM-A715F, SM-A715F/DS, SM-A715F/DSN, SM-A715F/DSM, SM-A715W, SM-A715X |
| Price | $ 151.42 / £ 185.00 / € 169.14 | About 120 EUR |
| SAR | 0.75 W/kg (head) 1.58 W/kg (body) | 0.98 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.89 W/kg (head) 1.60 W/kg (body) | 0.51 W/kg (head) 1.56 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Audio quality | - | Noise -93.5dB / Crosstalk -92.6dB |
| Battery life | Endurance rating 113h | Endurance rating 102h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -26.5 LUFS (Good) | -29.0 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 329802 (v8), 379313 (v9) GeekBench: 1891 (v5.1) GFXBench: 19fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 192 458(v7), 263396 (v8) GeekBench: 7039 (v4.4), 1733 (v5.1) GFXBench: 15fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
- Brighter Display
- More Modern Chipset (Exynos 1280)
- Slightly Better Battery Life
- 5G Connectivity
- Slightly Smaller Screen
- 25W Charging (Slow)
Samsung Galaxy A71
- Larger Screen Size
- Good Overall Performance
- Solid Camera System
- Less Bright Display
- Older Chipset (Snapdragon 730)
- Slightly Shorter Battery Life
Display Comparison
The A53 5G takes the display crown with a measured peak brightness of 830 nits, significantly brighter than the A71's 515 nits. Both offer excellent contrast ratios (infinite nominal), but the A53 5G's superior brightness makes it more usable outdoors and in bright environments. The A71's larger 6.7-inch screen might appeal to those who consume a lot of media, but the A53 5G's Super AMOLED panel is generally considered more visually appealing.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature versatile camera setups, but the A53 5G generally produces slightly better image quality, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. The A53 5G's image processing tends to be more refined. Both offer good video recording capabilities, but the A53 5G may have a slight edge in stabilization. Specific camera specs (megapixels, aperture) are similar across both devices, so the difference comes down to image processing and sensor performance.
Performance
The A53 5G's Exynos 1280 (5nm) offers a noticeable performance boost over the A71's Snapdragon 730 (8nm). The newer chipset and smaller manufacturing process translate to smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and improved gaming performance. While the A71 is still capable, the A53 5G provides a more future-proof experience.
Battery Life
The A53 5G demonstrates slightly better battery life, achieving an endurance rating of 113 hours compared to the A71's 102 hours. While the difference isn't massive, it suggests the A53 5G's more efficient chipset contributes to improved power management. Both phones support 25W wired charging, which is relatively slow by modern standards.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G? Users prioritizing a vibrant display, 5G connectivity, and a more recent processor. Who should buy the Samsung Galaxy A71? Those who prefer a larger screen size and are less concerned with having the absolute latest technology.