Samsung Galaxy A53 5G vs Galaxy A52: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Galaxy A53 5G edges out the A52 thanks to its brighter display, more efficient chipset, and 5G connectivity. While the A52 remains a solid choice, the A53's upgrades make it the slightly better pick for most users, especially those prioritizing future-proofing and a smoother experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Samsung Galaxy A53 5G | Samsung Galaxy A52 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 14, 20, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66 - SM-A536U | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 2, 5, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - SM-A536U | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| 2, 5, 48, 66, 77, 78, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - SM-A536V | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 17 | 2021, March 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 24 | Available. Released 2021, March 26 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 159.6 x 74.8 x 8.1 mm (6.28 x 2.94 x 0.32 in) | 159.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 189 g (6.67 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~407 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~85.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 101.0 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver) |
| Chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 | Adreno 618 |
| OS | Android 12, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 8 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7X", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (market/region dependent) | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Virtual proximity sensing | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 25W wired | 25W wired, 50% in 30 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Blue, Peach | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Violet, Awesome Blue |
| Models | SM-A536B, SM-A536B/DS, SM-A536U, SM-A536U1, SM-A5360, SM-A536E, SM-A536E/DS, SM-A536V, SM-A536W, SM-A536N, SM-S536DL | SM-A525F, SM-A525F/DS, SM-A525M, SM-A525M/DS |
| Price | $ 151.42 / £ 185.00 / € 169.14 | C$ 699.00 / £ 129.99 / € 169.89 |
| SAR | 0.75 W/kg (head) 1.58 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 0.89 W/kg (head) 1.60 W/kg (body) | 0.35 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 113h | Endurance rating 105h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -26.5 LUFS (Good) | -27.0 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 329802 (v8), 379313 (v9) GeekBench: 1891 (v5.1) GFXBench: 19fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 261282 (v8) GeekBench: 5865 (v4.4), 1577 (v5.1) GFXBench: 15fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
- Brighter Display
- More Powerful Chipset (Exynos 1280)
- 5G Connectivity
- Slightly Better Battery Life
- Improved Image Processing
- Slightly Higher Price
- Charging speed not significantly faster
Samsung Galaxy A52
- Lower Price
- Fast Charging (50% in 30 min)
- Reliable Performance
- Excellent Camera
- Less Powerful Chipset (Snapdragon 720G)
- Lower Peak Brightness
- No 5G
Display Comparison
The Galaxy A53 5G boasts a peak brightness of 830 nits, noticeably brighter than the A52's 794 nits. Both offer excellent contrast ratios (infinite nominal), resulting in vibrant colors and deep blacks. The A53's slightly higher brightness provides a better viewing experience in direct sunlight. Both feature Super AMOLED displays with a 120Hz refresh rate for smooth scrolling.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature versatile camera setups, but the A53 generally produces slightly better images, particularly in low-light conditions, due to its improved image processing. Both offer excellent video recording capabilities. The A53 also benefits from newer software features and algorithms.
Performance
The A53 5G utilizes the Exynos 1280 (5nm), a more modern and efficient chipset compared to the A52's Snapdragon 720G (8nm). This translates to smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and improved gaming performance on the A53. While the A52 is still capable, the A53 offers a noticeable performance boost.
Battery Life
The A53 5G has a slight edge in battery life, achieving an endurance rating of 113h compared to the A52's 105h. Both phones offer 25W wired charging, but the A52 advertises a 50% charge in 30 minutes, which is a slight advantage. However, the A53's more efficient chipset helps it last longer on a single charge.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G? Users seeking 5G connectivity, a brighter display for outdoor visibility, and a slightly more powerful processor. Who should buy the Samsung Galaxy A52? Budget-conscious buyers who still want a reliable Samsung phone with a great camera and display, and don't need 5G.