Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G vs Galaxy A72: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Galaxy A52s 5G edges out the A72 thanks to its significantly faster Snapdragon 778G chipset and 5G connectivity. While the A72 boasts slightly better battery endurance and a marginally brighter display, the A52s 5G's performance advantage makes it the overall winner for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G | Samsung Galaxy A72 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | - |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, August 17 | 2021, March 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, September 01 | Available. Released 2021, March 26 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 159.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) | 165 x 77.4 x 8.4 mm (6.50 x 3.05 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 189 g (6.67 oz) | 203 g (7.16 oz) |
| IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 107.8 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Adreno 618 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, One UI 4.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.4, (telephoto), 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Virtual Proximity Sensing | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 25W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 4500 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Purple, Awesome Mint | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Violet, Awesome Blue |
| Models | SM-A528B, SM-A528B/DS, SM-A528N | SM-A725F, SM-A725F/DS, SM-A725M, SM-A725M/DS |
| Price | £ 112.98 / € 249.47 | £ 174.89 / € 359.99 |
| SAR | 0.72 W/kg (head) | - |
| SAR EU | 0.88 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body) | 0.23 W/kg (head) 1.17 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 113h | Endurance rating 117h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -27.5 LUFS (Good) | -26.4 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 429675 (v8), 506432(v9) GeekBench: 11060 (v4.4), 2801 (v5.1) GFXBench: 28fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 279342 (v8) GeekBench: 6483 (v4.4), 1627 (v5.1) GFXBench: 15fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
- Faster Performance (Snapdragon 778G)
- 5G Connectivity
- Vibrant Super AMOLED Display
- Smooth 120Hz Refresh Rate
- Slightly better camera quality
- Slightly lower battery endurance than A72
- Smaller screen size
Samsung Galaxy A72
- Larger Display (6.7 inches)
- Slightly better battery endurance
- Good Value for Money
- Super AMOLED Display
- Smooth 120Hz Refresh Rate
- Slower Performance (Snapdragon 720G)
- No 5G Connectivity
- Older Chipset
Display Comparison
Both phones feature Super AMOLED displays with a 120Hz refresh rate, offering vibrant colors and smooth scrolling. The A72 has a slightly higher peak brightness of 825 nits compared to the A52s 5G's 800 nits, but the difference is minimal in real-world usage. Both have excellent contrast ratios (Infinite nominal). The A72's larger screen size (6.7 inches vs 6.5 inches) might appeal to those who consume a lot of media.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer versatile camera setups, typically including a main lens, ultrawide lens, macro lens, and depth sensor. Image quality is generally good in both, but the A52s 5G often produces slightly more detailed and vibrant photos, especially in good lighting conditions. Video recording capabilities are comparable, with both supporting up to 4K resolution. Low-light performance is decent on both, but not exceptional.
Performance
This is where the A52s 5G truly shines. Its Snapdragon 778G 5G chipset is considerably faster and more efficient than the A72's Snapdragon 720G. Expect noticeably quicker app loading times, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance on the A52s 5G. The A72's chipset is still capable, but it shows its age compared to the newer processor.
Battery Life
The A72 has a slightly higher endurance rating (117h) compared to the A52s 5G (113h), suggesting marginally better battery life. However, the A52s 5G's more efficient chipset helps offset this difference, and real-world battery performance is quite similar for moderate usage.
Buying Guide
The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G is ideal for users who prioritize performance, especially those wanting 5G connectivity and smoother gaming. The Galaxy A72 is a good choice for those who value slightly longer battery life and a larger screen, and are less concerned about raw processing power.