Samsung Galaxy A73 5G vs A52: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G represents a solid upgrade, primarily due to its significantly more powerful Snapdragon 778G 5G chipset. While the A52 boasts excellent battery endurance, the A73’s performance gains are noticeable in demanding tasks and gaming, making it the better choice for power users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Samsung Galaxy A52 | Samsung Galaxy A73 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, March 17 | 2022, March 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, March 26 | Available. Released 2022, April 22 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 159.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) | 163.7 x 76.1 x 7.6 mm (6.44 x 3.00 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 189 g (6.67 oz) | 181 g (6.38 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~407 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 101.0 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~87.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, 800 nits (HBM) | Super AMOLED Plus, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6.1 | Android 12, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 6.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 25W wired, 50% in 30 min | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Violet, Awesome Blue | Gray, Mint, White |
| Models | SM-A525F, SM-A525F/DS, SM-A525M, SM-A525M/DS | SM-A736B, SM-A736B/DS |
| Price | C$ 699.00 / £ 129.99 / € 169.89 | About 600 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.14 W/kg (head) |
| SAR EU | 0.35 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body) | 1.28 W/kg (head) 1.42 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 105h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker | -27.0 LUFS (Good) | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 261282 (v8) GeekBench: 5865 (v4.4), 1577 (v5.1) GFXBench: 15fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Samsung Galaxy A52
- Exceptional battery life (105h endurance)
- Proven reliability and software support
- Lower price point due to age
- Older Snapdragon 720G chipset
- Less future-proof 4G connectivity
Samsung Galaxy A73 5G
- Significantly faster Snapdragon 778G 5G chipset
- 5G connectivity for faster data speeds
- Improved image processing capabilities
- Battery life may be slightly lower than A52
- Potentially higher price tag
Display Comparison
Both the A52 and A73 5G feature displays aiming for vibrant visuals, but key differences exist. The A52 achieves a measured peak brightness of 794 nits, providing excellent visibility outdoors. While the A73 5G’s peak brightness isn’t specified, it’s reasonable to expect similar or slightly improved performance given the generational leap. Both displays boast an 'Infinite' contrast ratio (Samsung’s marketing term for high contrast), but the A73 5G’s panel technology isn’t detailed, potentially lacking the color accuracy refinements found in higher-end Samsung displays. Bezels are likely comparable, focusing on maximizing screen real estate within the mid-range segment.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are equipped with photo and video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is limited. The A73 5G’s advantage likely stems from improved image signal processing (ISP) within the Snapdragon 778G 5G, leading to better dynamic range and low-light performance. Without specific sensor size or aperture details, it’s difficult to quantify the difference, but the A73 5G’s newer chipset provides a computational photography edge. The inclusion of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on the primary sensor (likely on both models, based on Samsung’s A-series tradition) will contribute to sharper images and smoother videos. The 2MP macro cameras on both devices are likely to offer limited practical benefit.
Performance
The core difference between these two devices lies in their chipsets. The A52 utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (8nm), featuring an octa-core CPU with a 2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold and 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver configuration. The A73 5G steps up to the Snapdragon 778G 5G (6nm). This represents a significant architectural improvement; the 778G 5G features a 1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 prime core, 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 performance cores, and 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55 efficiency cores. The move to a 6nm process also enhances thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads. The A73 5G will demonstrably outperform the A52 in CPU-intensive tasks and gaming.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy A52 boasts an impressive endurance rating of 105 hours, indicating excellent battery life. The A73 5G’s battery capacity isn’t specified, but given the more power-efficient chipset, it’s likely to offer comparable, if not slightly improved, endurance. Both phones support 25W wired charging, with the A52 achieving 50% charge in 30 minutes. While faster charging technologies exist, 25W remains a standard offering in this price segment. The A73 5G’s 6nm chipset will reduce power consumption, potentially offsetting any difference in battery capacity.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Galaxy A52 if you prioritize exceptional battery life and are looking for a reliable, well-rounded phone at a lower price point. It’s ideal for everyday users who don’t heavily rely on mobile gaming or intensive applications. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G if you value faster performance, 5G connectivity, and a more future-proof experience. This phone is best suited for users who enjoy gaming, streaming, and multitasking.