Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs S23 Ultra: A Deep Dive into Samsung's Lineup

The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G represented a compelling entry point into 5G connectivity, offering a solid experience at a mid-range price. Now, the Galaxy S23 Ultra stands as Samsung’s current flagship, boasting cutting-edge technology. This comparison dissects the key differences between these two devices, helping you determine if the S23 Ultra’s premium features justify the significant price jump over the now-aging A52 5G.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user prioritizing value, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G remains a capable device, especially at its current discounted price. However, the S23 Ultra is the clear winner for those demanding top-tier performance, a superior camera system, and a brighter, more advanced display. The S23 Ultra’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset delivers a significantly smoother and more responsive experience.

PHONES
Phone Names Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 661, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International
5G bands1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub61, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA, LTE (up to 7CA), 5G
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5GGSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G
 -1, 7, 28, 41, 66, 71, 78, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA
Launch
Announced2021, March 172023, February 01
StatusAvailable. Released 2021, March 19Available. Released 2023, February 17
Body
BuildGlass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic backGlass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), aluminum frame
Dimensions159.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 in)163.4 x 78.1 x 8.9 mm (6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 in)
SIM· Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)
Weight189 g (6.67 oz)234 g (8.25 oz)
 IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min)IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Armor aluminum frame with tougher drop and scratch resistance (advertised) Stylus (Bluetooth integration, accelerometer, gyro)
Display
ProtectionCorning Gorilla Glass 5Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2
Resolution1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~407 ppi density)1440 x 3088 pixels, 19.3:9 ratio (~500 ppi density)
Size6.5 inches, 101.0 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio)6.8 inches, 114.7 cm2 (~89.9% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeSuper AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits (HBM)Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (HBM), 1750 nits (peak)
 Always-on displayAlways-on display
Platform
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570)Octa-core (1x3.36 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510)
ChipsetQualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm)Qualcomm SM8550-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm)
GPUAdreno 619Adreno 740
OSAndroid 11, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6.1Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 8
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)No
Internal128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 4GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM
 -UFS 4.0
Main Camera
FeaturesLED flash, panorama, HDRLaser AF, LED flash, auto-HDR, panorama
Quad64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7X", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens200 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.3", 0.6µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 10 MP, f/2.4, 70mm (telephoto), 1/3.52", 1.12µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 10 MP, f/4.9, 230mm (periscope telephoto), 1/3.52", 1.12µm, PDAF, OIS, 10x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, Super Steady video
Single-12 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), Dual Pixel PDAF
Video4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS8K@24/30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, HDR10+, stereo sound rec., gyro-EIS
Selfie camera
FeaturesHDRHDR, HDR10+
Single32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm12 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.2", 1.12µm, dual pixel PDAF
Video4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack YesNo
35mm jackYesNo
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakersYes, with stereo speakers
 -32-bit/384kHz audio Tuned by AKG
Comms
Bluetooth5.0, A2DP, LE5.3, A2DP, LE
NFCYes (market/region dependent)Yes
PositioningGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDSGPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS
RadioFM radio (market/region dependent)No
USBUSB Type-C 2.0, OTGUSB Type-C 3.2, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compassFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
 Virtual proximity sensingSamsung DeX, Samsung Wireless DeX (desktop experience support) Bixby natural language commands and dictation Samsung Pay (Visa, MasterCard certified) Ultra Wideband (UWB) support
Battery
Charging25W wired, 50% in 30 min45W wired, PD3.0, 65% in 30 min 15W wireless (Qi) 4.5W reverse wireless
TypeLi-Po 4500 mAhLi-Ion 5000 mAh
Misc
ColorsAwesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Violet, Awesome BluePhantom Black, Green, Cream, Lavender, Graphite, Sky Blue, Lime, Red, BMW M Edition
ModelsSM-A526B, SM-A526B/DS, SM-A5260, SM-A526W, SM-A526U, SM-A526U1SM-S918B, SM-S918B/DS, SM-S918U, SM-S918U1, SM-S918W, SM-S918N, SM-S9180, SM-S918E, SM-S918E/DS
Price$ 137.39 / £ 280.00 / € 115.49€ 549.90 / $ 454.99 / £ 433.00
SAR0.74 W/kg (head)     0.53 W/kg (body)1.12 W/kg (head)     0.92 W/kg (body)
SAR EU1.05 W/kg (head)     1.42 W/kg (body)0.96 W/kg (head)     1.40 W/kg (body)
Tests
Battery life Endurance rating 111h Endurance rating 126h
Camera Photo / Video Photo / Video
Display Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal)
Loudspeaker -27.5 LUFS (Good) -25.6 LUFS (Very good)
Performance AnTuTu: 334981 (v8), 386474 (v9) GeekBench: 1820 (v5.1) GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) AnTuTu: 1241531 (v9) GeekBench: 4927 (v5.1) GFXBench: 67fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

Samsung Galaxy A52 5G

  • Significantly more affordable
  • Excellent battery endurance for the price
  • Still a capable 5G device for everyday use

  • Outdated processor and RAM
  • Inferior display quality compared to flagship models
  • Camera system lacks advanced features

Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra

  • Top-tier performance with Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  • Exceptional camera system with advanced features
  • Bright, vibrant, and adaptive display

  • Very expensive
  • Larger and heavier than the A52 5G
  • May be overkill for basic smartphone users

Display Comparison

The S23 Ultra’s display is a substantial upgrade. Reaching a measured peak brightness of 1274 nits, it significantly outshines the A52 5G’s 787 nits, offering superior visibility in direct sunlight. While both feature an 'Infinite' contrast ratio (typical for Samsung AMOLED panels), the S23 Ultra likely benefits from more advanced panel technology and calibration for improved color accuracy. The S23 Ultra also benefits from adaptive refresh rate technology (LTPO) not present in the A52 5G, further enhancing smoothness and power efficiency.

Camera Comparison

While both phones offer photo and video capabilities, the S23 Ultra’s camera system is in a different league. Although specific sensor details aren’t provided, the S23 Ultra’s flagship status implies a much larger main sensor, advanced image stabilization (OIS), and superior image processing algorithms. The A52 5G likely relies on more basic computational photography techniques. The S23 Ultra’s camera system is designed for professional-level photography and videography, while the A52 5G is geared towards casual snapshots.

Performance

The performance gap is considerable. The A52 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G (8nm) is a capable mid-range chip, but it’s dwarfed by the S23 Ultra’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm). The 4nm process node of the 8 Gen 2 offers significantly improved thermal efficiency, meaning less throttling during sustained workloads like gaming. The S23 Ultra’s CPU, with its Cortex-X3 prime core, delivers a substantial performance boost over the A52 5G’s Kryo 570 cores. The S23 Ultra also utilizes faster LPDDR5x RAM, contributing to snappier multitasking and app loading times.

Battery Life

Both phones achieve respectable endurance ratings – 111 hours for the A52 5G and 126 hours for the S23 Ultra. However, the S23 Ultra’s active use score of 13:24h suggests a more efficient power management system despite a potentially larger display. The S23 Ultra also boasts faster charging at 45W (65% in 30 minutes) compared to the A52 5G’s 25W (50% in 30 minutes), and adds wireless charging capabilities (15W Qi and 4.5W reverse wireless) absent on the A52 5G.

Buying Guide

Buy the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G if you need a reliable 5G smartphone for everyday tasks, prioritize battery endurance over raw power, and are on a strict budget. Buy the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra if you demand the best possible Android experience, require a professional-grade camera system, and value features like fast charging, a vibrant display, and long-term software support.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Is the Snapdragon 750G in the A52 5G still good enough for gaming in 2024?
The Snapdragon 750G can handle many mobile games, but you'll likely need to lower graphics settings for demanding titles. Expect occasional frame drops and longer loading times compared to the S23 Ultra's Snapdragon 8 Gen 2. It's suitable for casual gaming, but not ideal for competitive or graphically intensive games.
❓ Does the S23 Ultra get excessively hot during prolonged use, like gaming or video recording?
The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 in the S23 Ultra is significantly more thermally efficient than previous generations. While it can get warm during extended heavy use, Samsung's cooling system effectively mitigates overheating and prevents significant performance throttling. It remains cooler than many other flagship phones under similar loads.
❓ How much faster is the charging on the S23 Ultra compared to the A52 5G in real-world use?
The S23 Ultra's 45W charging can take the phone from 0% to 65% in 30 minutes, while the A52 5G reaches 50% in the same timeframe. This translates to a noticeably quicker top-up for the S23 Ultra, especially useful for users who frequently need to recharge throughout the day.
❓ Is the camera on the A52 5G sufficient for social media and casual photography?
Yes, the A52 5G's camera is perfectly adequate for social media and everyday snapshots. It captures decent images in good lighting conditions. However, it lacks the dynamic range, detail, and low-light performance of the S23 Ultra's more advanced camera system.