Samsung Galaxy A51 5G vs Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing longevity, the Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G emerges as the winner. Its significantly superior 116-hour endurance rating, coupled with 33W fast charging, outweighs the A51 5G’s slightly brighter display. However, those heavily invested in the Samsung ecosystem may find the A51 5G a more comfortable fit.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Samsung Galaxy A51 5G | Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - SM-A516B/DS | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - SM-A516B/DS | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 41, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - SM-A516B/DS | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G (2+ Gbps DL) |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 2, 4, 5, 12, 13, 25, 26, 41, 66, 71 - SM-A516U | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, April 08 | 2020, September 30. Released 2020, October 13 |
| Status | Available. Released 2020, April 29 | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 158.9 x 73.6 x 8.7 mm (6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 in) | 165.4 x 76.8 x 9 mm (6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 187 g (6.60 oz) | 214.5 g (7.58 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~87.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A77 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) |
| Chipset | Exynos 980 (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 10, upgradable to Android 13, One UI 5 | Android 10, MIUI 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | 64GB 6GB RAM - UFS 2.1 128GB 6GB RAM - UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 720p@960fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | Yes |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | FM radio, RDS, recording | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| ANT+ | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 33W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4820 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Prism Cube Black, Prism Cube White, Prism Cube Pink | Atlantic Blue, Pearl Gray, Rose Gold Beach |
| Models | SM-A516F, SM-A516F/DSN, SM-A516N, SM-A516B/DS, SM-A516B, SM-A516U, SC-54A, SM-A516U1, SCG07, SM-A5160 | M2007J17G |
| Price | About 180 EUR | About 190 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.06 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.50 W/kg (head) 1.55 W/kg (body) | 0.59 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 90h | Endurance rating 116h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: 1368:1 |
| Loudspeaker | -29.5 LUFS (Average) | -25.3 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 316007 (v8) GeekBench: 1867(v5.1) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 318882 (v8) GeekBench: 2009 (v5.1) GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G
- Slightly brighter display for outdoor use
- Samsung One UI software experience
- Established brand reputation
- Inferior battery life compared to Mi 10T Lite 5G
- Slower 15W charging
- Lower contrast ratio
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
- Exceptional battery life (116h endurance)
- Faster 33W charging
- Superior contrast ratio for vibrant visuals
- Slightly dimmer display
- Xiaomi’s MIUI software may not appeal to all
- Potentially less refined camera processing
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G boasts a measured peak brightness of 642 nits, offering better visibility in direct sunlight compared to the Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G’s 596 nits. However, the Mi 10T Lite 5G counters with a superior contrast ratio of 1368:1, resulting in richer, more vibrant colors and deeper blacks, a noticeable advantage over the A51 5G’s ‘Infinite’ (nominal) contrast ratio. Both displays utilize similar technologies, but the contrast difference will be more apparent in everyday use.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but detailed sensor information is limited. The focus should be on image processing and software features, where Samsung traditionally excels. Without specific sensor size or aperture data, it’s difficult to declare a clear winner. The inclusion of 'Photo/Video' capabilities on both suggests a similar feature set, but the Mi 10T Lite 5G’s image processing algorithms may lean towards a more vibrant, saturated look, while Samsung often aims for more natural color reproduction.
Performance
Both devices employ 8nm process technology, with the Samsung A51 5G utilizing the Exynos 980 and the Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G featuring the Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G. While both CPUs share a similar core configuration (2x2.2 GHz and 6x1.8 GHz), the Snapdragon 750G’s Kryo 570 cores are architecturally more efficient than the Exynos 980’s Cortex-A77/A55 combination. This translates to potentially better sustained performance and thermal management under heavy loads for the Mi 10T Lite 5G, though real-world differences may be subtle for typical usage.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G decisively wins in battery endurance, achieving a remarkable 116-hour rating compared to the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G’s 90-hour rating. This translates to a full day or more of extra usage on a single charge. Furthermore, the Mi 10T Lite 5G supports 33W wired charging, allowing for significantly faster top-ups – likely achieving a 0-100% charge in under an hour – while the A51 5G is limited to a slower 15W charging speed.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G if you prioritize a slightly brighter display for outdoor visibility and prefer the Samsung One UI software experience. Buy the Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G if you value exceptional battery life, significantly faster charging speeds, and a more aggressive price point, even if it means sacrificing some display brightness.