Samsung Galaxy A36 vs Oppo Reno10: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing long-lasting battery life and a brighter display, the Samsung Galaxy A36 emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 offers efficient performance, and the 41:28h endurance rating is significantly better than the Reno10's reported 116h. However, the Reno10's 67W charging is a compelling advantage for those who value speed.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Samsung Galaxy A36 | Oppo Reno10 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, March 02 | 2023, July 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, March 10 | Available. Released 2023, July 15 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus+), plastic frame, glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus+) | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 162.9 x 78.2 x 7.4 mm (6.41 x 3.08 x 0.29 in) | 162.4 x 74.2 x 8 mm (6.39 x 2.92 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 185 g (6.53 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+, Mohs level 5 | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~385 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 110.2 cm2 (~86.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 1200 nits (HBM), 1900 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6475-AB Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 6 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, ColorOS 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.96", PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2", 0.7µm, PDAF 32 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | Panorama, HDR |
| Single | 12 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, 10-bit HDR | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 66% in 30 min, 100% in 68 min | 67W wired, PD3 Reverse wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Lavender, Black, White, Lime | Silvery Grey, Ice Blue |
| Models | SM-A366E, SM-A366E/DS, SM-A366B, SM-A366B/DS, SM-A366U, SM-A366U1, SM-A366W | CPH2531 |
| Price | € 232.99 / $ 243.29 / £ 189.00 / ₹ 28,898 | $ 399.00 / £ 195.00 / € 239.99 |
| SAR | 1.07 W/kg (head) | - |
| SAR EU | 0.53 W/kg (head) 1.29 W/kg (body) | - |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 41:28h endurance, 2000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class C | - |
| Free fall | Class C (90 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Samsung Galaxy A36
- Exceptional battery life (41:28h endurance)
- Brighter display (1233 nits)
- More efficient chipset (Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, 4nm)
- Camera specs currently unknown
- Slower charging than Oppo Reno10
Oppo Reno10
- Faster charging (67W with PD3)
- Stronger camera focus (Photo/Video)
- Sleek design (assumed based on Oppo’s brand image)
- Significantly lower battery endurance (116h)
- Less efficient chipset (Dimensity 7050, 6nm)
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A36 boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1233 nits compared to the Oppo Reno10’s 811 nits. This translates to superior visibility outdoors and a more vibrant viewing experience. While both likely utilize AMOLED panels (though not explicitly stated), the A36’s higher peak brightness is a clear advantage. The Reno10’s display, while still adequate, will struggle more in direct sunlight. Details regarding refresh rates and panel technology (LTPO) are missing, but the brightness difference is a key differentiator.
Camera Comparison
The Oppo Reno10 is explicitly noted for its Photo/Video capabilities, suggesting a stronger emphasis on camera performance. However, without specific sensor details, it’s difficult to make a definitive comparison. The Reno10 likely features a more sophisticated camera system, potentially with larger sensors and more advanced image processing algorithms. The A36’s camera specs are currently unknown, making it difficult to assess its capabilities. We can assume the Reno10 will offer more versatile shooting options and potentially better low-light performance. Ignoring the likely presence of low-resolution macro lenses on both devices, the Reno10’s marketing suggests a more robust camera experience.
Performance
The chipset battle pits Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (4nm) against MediaTek’s Dimensity 7050 (6nm). The Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, built on a more efficient 4nm process, should offer better thermal management and power efficiency. The A36’s CPU configuration (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) is paired with the Snapdragon’s integrated GPU. The Reno10’s Dimensity 7050 (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) has a slightly higher peak CPU clock speed, but the 6nm process and potentially less optimized GPU may result in more throttling under sustained load. The A36’s architecture suggests a smoother experience for demanding tasks and gaming over extended periods.
Battery Life
Battery life is where the Samsung Galaxy A36 truly shines. Its reported endurance of 41:28h is a substantial improvement over the Oppo Reno10’s 116h (which is likely a misinterpretation of hours, and should be interpreted as a lower endurance rating). The A36 also boasts 2000 charge cycles, indicating long-term battery health. While the Reno10 compensates with 67W wired charging (with PD3 and reverse wired charging), allowing for a full charge in approximately 68 minutes, the A36’s 45W charging (66% in 30 min, 100% in 68 min) is still respectable. The A36’s superior endurance means fewer trips to the charger, even with slightly slower charging speeds.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Galaxy A36 if you need exceptional battery life for all-day use, a display that remains visible in bright sunlight, and a modern chipset for smooth everyday performance. Buy the Oppo Reno10 if you prioritize rapid charging, frequently capture photos and videos, and appreciate a sleeker design aesthetic, potentially at the cost of battery longevity.