The Samsung Galaxy A23 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 are two of the most popular budget smartphones available. Both offer compelling features at an affordable price, but which one comes out on top? This comprehensive comparison will break down every aspect, from display quality to battery life, to help you make the right choice.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 edges out the A23 thanks to its significantly brighter display and faster charging. While both offer similar performance and battery life, the Redmi Note 11's added convenience and visual clarity make it the slightly better overall package for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 04 | 2022, January 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 25 | Available. Released 2022, February 09 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 165.4 x 76.9 x 8.4 mm (6.51 x 3.03 x 0.33 in) | 159.9 x 73.9 x 8.1 mm (6.30 x 2.91 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 179 g (6.31 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~82.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | PLS LCD, 90Hz | AMOLED, 90Hz, 700 nits, 1000 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6.1 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF, OIS
5 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | Virtual proximity sensing | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 25W wired | 33W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 60 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Peach, Blue | Graphite Gray, Twilight Blue, Star Blue |
| Models | SM-A235F, SM-A235F/DS, SM-A235F/DSN, SM-A235M, SM-A235M/DS, SM-A235N | 2201117TG, 2201117TI, 2201117TY, 2201117TL |
| Price | £ 99.00 / ₹ 14,999 | £ 95.00 / € 97.99 / ₹ 11,950 |
| SAR | 0.48 W/kg (head) | 0.97 W/kg (head) 0.93 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.36 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 130h
|
Endurance rating 126h
|
| Camera |
Photo / Video |
Photo / Video |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: 1241:1 |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker |
-27.6 LUFS (Good)
|
-25.8 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 273554 (v9)
GeekBench: 1632 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 6.7fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
AnTuTu: 228044 (v8), 244526 (v9)
GeekBench: 1662 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 6.8fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Samsung Galaxy A23
- Excellent battery life
- Reliable brand (Samsung)
- Good display contrast
- Slower charging
- Lower display brightness
- Potentially less refined design
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
- Brighter display
- Faster charging (33W)
- Modern design
- PD3.0, QC3 support
- Slightly lower battery endurance rating
- Brand reputation (Xiaomi can vary by region)
Display Comparison
The Redmi Note 11 boasts a significantly brighter display at 736 nits compared to the A23's 464 nits. While both offer excellent contrast ratios (1241:1 for A23, 'Infinite' nominal for Redmi Note 11), the Redmi Note 11's brightness makes it easier to view in direct sunlight. The A23's display is still good, but the Redmi Note 11 provides a noticeably better viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is generally similar, with both offering decent image quality in good lighting conditions. The A23 might have a slight edge in video recording due to potentially better stabilization, but both struggle in low light. Specific camera specs (megapixels, aperture) would need to be compared for a more detailed analysis.
Performance
Both phones share the same Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 chipset, ensuring comparable performance for everyday tasks and moderate gaming. Don't expect flagship-level speeds, but both handle social media, browsing, and streaming without issue. The 6nm process is efficient, contributing to good battery life.
Battery Life
Both phones offer excellent battery life, with endurance ratings of 130h and 126h respectively. While the A23 has a slightly higher rating, the difference is minimal in real-world usage. The Redmi Note 11's 33W charging is considerably faster than the A23's 25W, allowing for quicker top-ups.
Buying Guide
The Samsung Galaxy A23 is ideal for users prioritizing long battery life and a reliable brand. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 is a better choice for those who value a brighter screen, faster charging, and a slightly more modern design.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better battery life?
Both offer excellent battery life, but the Samsung Galaxy A23 has a slightly higher endurance rating.
❓ Is the Redmi Note 11 worth the extra cost?
If you prioritize a brighter display and faster charging, the Redmi Note 11 is worth the slight premium.
