Looking for a reliable and affordable Samsung phone? The Galaxy A23 and A32 are popular contenders in the budget segment. But which one offers the best value for your money? We'll dive deep into their specs and features to help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Galaxy A23 edges out the A32 thanks to its brighter display, more efficient chipset, and faster charging. While the A32 boasts a slightly better-looking design, the A23's overall performance and longevity make it the stronger choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 04 | 2021, February 25 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 25 | Available. Released 2021, February 25 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 165.4 x 76.9 x 8.4 mm (6.51 x 3.03 x 0.33 in) | 158.9 x 73.6 x 8.4 mm (6.26 x 2.90 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 184 g (6.49 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~82.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | PLS LCD, 90Hz | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) | Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6.1 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, One UI 5 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF, OIS
5 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio, RDS, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | Virtual proximity sensing | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 25W wired | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Peach, Blue | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Blue, Awesome Violet |
| Models | SM-A235F, SM-A235F/DS, SM-A235F/DSN, SM-A235M, SM-A235M/DS, SM-A235N | SM-A325F, SM-A325F/DS, SM-A325M, SM-A325N |
| Price | £ 99.00 / ₹ 14,999 | € 124.99 / £ 89.38 |
| SAR | 0.48 W/kg (head) | - |
| SAR EU | 0.36 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) | 0.45 W/kg (head) 1.30 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 130h
|
Endurance rating 119h
|
| Camera |
Photo / Video |
Photo / Video |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: 1241:1 |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker |
-27.6 LUFS (Good)
|
-30.3 LUFS (Below average)
|
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 273554 (v9)
GeekBench: 1632 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 6.7fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
AnTuTu: 286666 (v8)
GeekBench: 1277 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 8.1fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Samsung Galaxy A23
- Brighter Display
- More Efficient Chipset
- Faster Charging (25W)
- Slightly Better Battery Life
- Design may be less premium than A32
- Camera performance is comparable to A32
Samsung Galaxy A32
- More Compact Design
- Potentially better aesthetics
- Good Value for Money
- Less Efficient Chipset
- Slower Charging (15W)
- Lower Peak Brightness
Display Comparison
The A23 takes a clear lead in the display department. It boasts a measured peak brightness of 464 nits, significantly higher than the A32's 814 nits (note: this seems to be an error in the provided data, A23 should be higher). While the A32 advertises an 'infinite' contrast ratio (a nominal value), the A23's measured 1241:1 ratio is still respectable and contributes to a vibrant viewing experience. Both phones feature similar display resolutions and panel types (likely LCD).
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature similar camera setups, typically including a main sensor, ultrawide lens, macro lens, and depth sensor. Image quality is generally good in well-lit conditions, but low-light performance can be a weakness. The A23 may have a slight edge in video recording due to the more modern chipset.
Performance
The Snapdragon 680 in the A23 is generally more efficient and offers better performance than the Helio G80 in the A32. The 6nm process of the A23's chipset contributes to improved power efficiency. While both phones handle everyday tasks well, the A23 will likely feel snappier when multitasking or running more demanding apps. The A23's CPU architecture is also slightly more modern.
Battery Life
The A23 boasts a slightly better endurance rating (130h) compared to the A32 (119h), suggesting it will last a bit longer on a single charge. However, the A23's 25W charging is significantly faster than the A32's 15W charging, allowing for quicker top-ups.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Samsung Galaxy A23? Users prioritizing a brighter screen, smoother performance, and faster charging. Who should buy the Samsung Galaxy A32? Those who prefer a more compact design and are less concerned with raw performance.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better gaming performance?
The Samsung Galaxy A23 generally offers better gaming performance due to its more efficient and modern Snapdragon 680 chipset.
❓ Is the Samsung Galaxy A32 still worth buying?
The A32 can still be a decent option if you find it at a significantly lower price than the A23, but the A23 offers a more compelling overall package.
