Samsung's Galaxy A series consistently delivers excellent value, but choosing between models can be tricky. Today, we're pitting the Galaxy A23 against the A14 to see which phone reigns supreme in the budget arena. Let's dive into a detailed comparison to help you make the right decision.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Galaxy A23 edges out the A14 thanks to its superior display brightness, more efficient chipset, and faster charging. However, the A14 offers a potentially more modern design and a slightly lower price point, making it a compelling alternative for budget-conscious buyers.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 04 | 2023, February 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 25 | Available. Released 2023, March 27 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 165.4 x 76.9 x 8.4 mm (6.51 x 3.03 x 0.33 in) | 167.7 x 78 x 9.1 mm (6.60 x 3.07 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 201 g (7.09 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~82.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~80.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | PLS LCD, 90Hz | PLS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) - Version AOcta-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) - Version B |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) | Mediatek MT6769 Helio G80 (12 nm) - Version AExynos 850 (8 nm) - Version B |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6.1 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, One UI 7 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF, OIS
5 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.75", 0.64µm, PDAF
5 MP, f/2.2, 17mm (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1 or 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| | Virtual proximity sensing | - |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 25W wired | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Peach, Blue | Black, Dark Red, Silver, Green |
| Models | SM-A235F, SM-A235F/DS, SM-A235F/DSN, SM-A235M, SM-A235M/DS, SM-A235N | SM-A145F, SM-A145F/DSN, SM-A145M, SM-A145M/DS, SM-A145P, SM-A145R |
| Price | £ 99.00 / ₹ 14,999 | € 85.76 / $ 147.60 / £ 79.95 |
| SAR | 0.48 W/kg (head) | - |
| SAR EU | 0.36 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) | 0.46 W/kg (head) 1.37 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 130h
| - |
| Camera |
Photo / Video | - |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: 1241:1 | - |
| Loudspeaker |
-27.6 LUFS (Good)
| - |
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 273554 (v9)
GeekBench: 1632 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 6.7fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Samsung Galaxy A23
- Brighter Display
- More Efficient Chipset
- Faster Charging (25W)
- Excellent Battery Life (130h Endurance)
- Potentially Higher Price
- Design may be less modern than A14
Samsung Galaxy A14
- Potentially Lower Price
- Modern Design (likely)
- Good Battery Life
- Less Bright Display
- Less Efficient Chipset
- Slower Charging (15W)
Display Comparison
The A23 boasts a significantly higher peak brightness of 464 nits compared to the A14 (estimated around 380-400 nits). Its 1241:1 contrast ratio also suggests better image quality. While both feature similar display technology (likely LCD), the A23's superior brightness makes it the clear winner for outdoor visibility and overall visual experience.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature multi-lens camera setups. The A23 is expected to have a higher resolution main sensor (likely 50MP) compared to the A14 (likely 50MP). Image processing and software optimization will play a crucial role in determining the overall camera quality. We'll need more detailed testing to definitively declare a winner, but the A23's hardware suggests a slight advantage.
Performance
The Snapdragon 680 in the A23 is generally considered more efficient and offers slightly better performance than the Helio G80 (or Exynos 850) in the A14. The 6nm process of the Snapdragon 680 also contributes to better power efficiency. While both handle everyday tasks well, the A23 will likely feel snappier when multitasking or running more demanding apps.
Battery Life
The A23's endurance rating of 130h is exceptional, indicating outstanding battery life. The A14's battery life is expected to be good, but likely not as impressive as the A23. The A23 also benefits from 25W wired charging, significantly faster than the A14's 15W charging.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Samsung Galaxy A23? Users prioritizing a vibrant display, smoother performance, and faster charging will appreciate the A23. Who should buy the Samsung Galaxy A14? Those seeking a more affordable option with a potentially updated design and a focus on essential features will find the A14 appealing.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better performance?
The Samsung Galaxy A23 generally offers better performance due to its more efficient Snapdragon 680 chipset.
❓ Is the A14 worth buying if I'm on a tight budget?
Yes, the A14 is a solid option for budget-conscious buyers, offering essential features and a potentially more modern design at a lower price point.
