Samsung's Galaxy A series consistently delivers excellent value, but choosing between models can be tricky. We're pitting the Galaxy A23 5G against the Galaxy A14 to determine which offers the best bang for your buck. This comparison dives deep into specs, performance, and features to help you make an informed decision.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Galaxy A23 5G takes the lead thanks to its superior chipset, brighter display, and faster charging. However, the A14's potentially lower price and Exynos 850 variant (Version B) could make it a compelling alternative for budget-conscious buyers. It's a close call!
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | 2, 5, 30, 66, 77 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, August 05 | 2023, February 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, September 02 | Available. Released 2023, March 27 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 165.4 x 76.9 x 8.4 mm (6.51 x 3.03 x 0.33 in) | 167.7 x 78 x 9.1 mm (6.60 x 3.07 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 197 g (6.95 oz) | 201 g (7.09 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~82.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~80.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | PLS LCD, 120Hz | PLS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) - Version AOcta-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) - Version B |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Mediatek MT6769 Helio G80 (12 nm) - Version AExynos 850 (8 nm) - Version B |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, One UI 7 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF, OIS
5 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | - | 13 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.75", 0.64µm, PDAF
5 MP, f/2.2, 17mm (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm - USA
8 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm - International | 13 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1 or 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio (market/region dependent) | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (USA only) | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| | Virtual proximity sensing | - |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 25W wired | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Peach, Blue | Black, Dark Red, Silver, Green |
| Models | SM-A236U, SM-A236U1, SM-A236B, SM-A236B/DS, SM-A236B/DSN, SM-A236E, SM-S236DL | SM-A145F, SM-A145F/DSN, SM-A145M, SM-A145M/DS, SM-A145P, SM-A145R |
| Price | $ 84.44 / £ 129.00 / € 125.28 / ₹ 21,000 | € 85.76 / $ 147.60 / £ 79.95 |
| SAR | 0.68 W/kg (head) 0.57 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 1.49 W/kg (head) 1.25 W/kg (body) | 0.46 W/kg (head) 1.37 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 138h
| - |
| Camera |
Photo / Video | - |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: 1328:1 (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker |
-25.9 LUFS (Very good)
| - |
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 318821 (v9)
GeekBench: 1940 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
- Faster Processor
- Brighter Display
- 5G Connectivity
- Faster Charging (25W)
- Excellent Battery Life (138h Endurance)
- Potentially Higher Price
- Design may be less premium
Samsung Galaxy A14
- Potentially Lower Price
- Reliable Samsung Experience
- Decent Battery Life
- Exynos 850 variant (Version B) offers improved performance over Helio G80
- Slower Processor
- Dimmer Display
- Slower Charging (15W)
- Helio G80 variant performance is less competitive
Display Comparison
The A23 5G boasts a significantly brighter display at 508 nits compared to the A14 (estimated around 400-450 nits). Both offer a 1328:1 contrast ratio, indicating good black levels, but the A23 5G's higher brightness will make it more visible outdoors. Both likely feature a 6.6-inch FHD+ display.
Camera Comparison
While both phones offer multiple rear cameras, the A23 5G is expected to have a more capable main sensor and potentially better image processing due to its more modern chipset. The A14's camera performance is decent but not exceptional. Specific camera specs (megapixels, aperture) would need to be confirmed for a more precise comparison.
Performance
Here's where the A23 5G truly shines. Its Snapdragon 695 5G chipset (6nm) is considerably more powerful than the A14's Helio G80 (12nm) or the Exynos 850 (8nm). Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading, and better gaming performance on the A23 5G. The A14's CPU architecture is also less efficient.
Battery Life
The A23 5G's endurance rating of 138h is exceptionally high, suggesting excellent battery life. The A14's battery life is also good, but likely not as impressive. However, the A14's slower 15W charging means it will take longer to recharge.
Buying Guide
The Samsung Galaxy A23 5G is ideal for users who prioritize performance, a vibrant display, and 5G connectivity. The Galaxy A14 is a great choice for those on a tighter budget who still want a reliable Samsung experience, especially if they can find the Exynos 850 version.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Samsung Galaxy A23 5G is significantly better for gaming due to its more powerful Snapdragon 695 5G chipset.
❓ Is the Exynos 850 version of the A14 worth it?
Yes, the Exynos 850 version (Version B) of the A14 offers a noticeable performance boost over the Helio G80 variant, making it a more competitive option.
