Samsung Galaxy A22 5G vs A32 5G: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G is the better choice. Its significantly brighter display (497 nits vs 385 nits) and slightly longer battery endurance (123h vs 118h) provide a more enjoyable and reliable daily experience, despite a minimal performance difference.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Samsung Galaxy A22 5G | Samsung Galaxy A32 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat16 1024/75 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 25, 41, 66, 71 SA/NSA/Sub6 - SM-A326U | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, June 03 | 2021, January 13 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, June 24 | Available. Released 2021, January 22 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 167.2 x 76.4 x 9 mm (6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 9.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 203 g (7.16 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~399 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~82.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT LCD, 90Hz | TFT LCD, 60Hz (International), 90Hz (SM-A326U, SM-326DL only) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 720 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC3 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, One UI core 5 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, One UI 5 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 5 MP, f/2.2, 115˚ (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1152p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Gray, White, Mint, Violet | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Blue, Awesome Violet |
| Models | SM-A226B, SM-A226B/DS, SM-A226B/DSN, SM-A226BR, SM-A226BR/N, SM-A226L, SC-56B | SM-A326B, SM-A326B/DS, SM-A326BR/DS, SM-A326BR, SM-A326U, SM-A326W, SM-A326U1, SM-A326K, SCG08, SM-S326DL |
| Price | £ 92.00 / € 125.99 | € 111.89 / $ 78.64 / £ 77.53 |
| SAR EU | 0.73 W/kg (head) 1.23 W/kg (body) | 0.33 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 118h | Endurance rating 123h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 1631:1 (nominal) | Contrast ratio: 1470:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -28.5 LUFS (Average) | -28.5 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 242155 (v8), 223188 (v9) GeekBench: 6913 (v4.4), 1719 (v5.1) GFXBench: 12fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 226561 (v8) GeekBench: 1673 (v5.1) |
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
- Potentially slightly faster CPU performance in benchmarks
- Often available at a lower price point
- Similar 5G connectivity to the A32 5G
- Dimmer display makes outdoor visibility challenging
- Slightly shorter battery life
- May exhibit more throttling under sustained load
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
- Significantly brighter display for better viewing experience
- Slightly longer battery life for all-day use
- Optimized Dimensity 720 chipset for 5G efficiency
- May be slightly more expensive than the A22 5G
- CPU clock speed slightly lower than A22 5G
- Similar camera system to the A22 5G
Display Comparison
The A32 5G boasts a considerably brighter display, reaching a measured 497 nits compared to the A22 5G’s 385 nits. This translates to significantly improved visibility outdoors and a more engaging viewing experience, especially for video content. While both displays feature a contrast ratio around 1500:1, the higher brightness of the A32 5G makes a tangible difference in perceived contrast. Both are likely to use TFT LCD panels, common in this price bracket, and neither are expected to offer high refresh rates.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature a similar 'Photo / Video' camera setup, lacking detailed specifications in the provided data. Given the market segment, expect a primary sensor paired with ultrawide and depth sensors, and likely a 2MP macro lens of limited utility. Image quality will likely be comparable, relying heavily on Samsung’s software processing. Without sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner; however, Samsung’s image processing algorithms are generally consistent across its A-series.
Performance
Both devices utilize Mediatek Dimensity chipsets, but the A32 5G features the Dimensity 720, while the A22 5G has the Dimensity 700. The Dimensity 720’s CPU has a slightly lower clock speed on its prime cores (2.0 GHz vs 2.2 GHz on the A22 5G), but the overall performance difference in real-world usage is minimal. Both are octa-core CPUs with the same Cortex-A55 efficiency cores. The A22 5G’s slightly faster cores may offer a marginal advantage in CPU-intensive tasks, but the A32 5G’s chipset is optimized for 5G connectivity and power efficiency.
Battery Life
The A32 5G edges out the A22 5G in battery endurance, achieving a rating of 123 hours versus 118 hours. Both phones utilize a 15W wired charging solution, meaning charging times will be similar. The slightly longer endurance of the A32 5G suggests better power efficiency from the Dimensity 720 chipset or a slightly optimized software implementation. While neither offers particularly fast charging, the endurance rating indicates the A32 5G will likely last longer on a single charge with typical usage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G if you prioritize a lower initial cost and are primarily focused on basic smartphone tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G if you value a brighter, more vibrant display for media consumption, and want a slightly longer-lasting battery for all-day use, even if it means spending a bit more.