The Samsung Galaxy A17 and the vivo Y76 5G represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive budget 5G smartphone market. While both aim to deliver 5G connectivity at an accessible price point, they take different approaches to achieving this, particularly in chipset choice and battery technology. This comparison dissects their strengths and weaknesses to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing long-term battery life and sustained performance, the Samsung Galaxy A17 emerges as the stronger choice. Its Exynos 1330 chipset, coupled with exceptional 43:52h endurance, outweighs the vivo Y76 5G’s faster charging, making it ideal for power users and travelers.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International | 1, 3, 28, 40, 41, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, August 06 | 2021, November 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, August 14 | Available. Released 2021, November 23 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), plastic frame, fiber-reinforced plastic back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.4 x 77.9 x 7.5 mm (6.47 x 3.07 x 0.30 in) | 163.8 x 75 x 7.8 mm (6.45 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 175 g (6.17 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus, Mohs level 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~385 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 110.2 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, 800 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD, 460 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Exynos 1330 (5 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MP2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 6 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 | Android 11, Funtouch 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 4GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF, OIS
5 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 25W wired | 44W wired, 70% in 32 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 4100 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Gray, Blue | Cosmic Aurora, Midnight Space |
| Models | SM-A176B, SM-A176B/DS | V2124 |
| Price | $ 189.99 / C$ 270.14 / £ 178.00 / € 171.10 / ₹ 18,999 | About 180 EUR |
| SAR EU | 0.67 W/kg (head) 0.97 W/kg (body) | - |
| EU LABEL |
|---|
| Battery | 43:52h endurance, 1200 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class B (180 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Samsung Galaxy A17
- Exceptional battery life (43:52h endurance)
- More efficient Exynos 1330 chipset (5nm)
- Higher peak display brightness (738 nits)
- Slower charging speed (25W)
- Camera specs currently unknown
vivo Y76 5G
- Faster charging (44W, 70% in 32 min)
- Potentially lower price point
- 5G connectivity
- Less efficient Dimensity 700 chipset (7nm)
- Likely shorter battery life
- Display brightness likely lower
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A17 boasts a display capable of reaching 738 nits of peak brightness, a significant advantage for outdoor visibility compared to the likely lower peak brightness of the vivo Y76 5G (data unavailable). While both likely utilize LCD panels given their price bracket, the A17’s higher brightness translates to a more usable experience in direct sunlight. Details regarding color accuracy and refresh rate are missing for both, but the A17’s brightness gives it an initial edge.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is difficult. However, given the market positioning, it’s reasonable to assume both phones will feature a primary camera and several auxiliary lenses. The absence of information regarding sensor size and aperture makes it impossible to determine image quality differences. It's likely both will include a 2MP macro lens, which offers limited practical benefit due to its low resolution. Image processing will likely be the differentiating factor, with Samsung typically favoring vibrant, saturated colors, while vivo often aims for a more natural look.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Samsung Galaxy A17’s Exynos 1330, fabricated on a 5nm process, offers a clear architectural advantage over the vivo Y76 5G’s Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7nm). The 5nm node allows for greater transistor density and improved power efficiency, meaning the A17 should exhibit less thermal throttling under sustained load. While the Dimensity 700’s Cortex-A76 cores have a slightly higher clock speed (2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz on the A17’s A78 cores), the A78 architecture is generally more efficient and delivers better performance per clock cycle. This translates to a smoother experience in demanding applications and games for the A17.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy A17 truly shines in battery endurance, achieving an impressive 43:52h of total usage and 11:48h of active use. This is a substantial lead over what we’d expect from the vivo Y76 5G, given its focus on faster charging rather than extended capacity. While the Y76 5G compensates with 44W wired charging (reaching 70% in 32 minutes), the A17’s 25W charging is adequate, and the significantly longer battery life minimizes the need for frequent top-ups. The A17’s reported 1200 battery cycles also suggests greater long-term battery health.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Galaxy A17 if you need a phone that can reliably last through a full day – and beyond – of heavy use, and if you value a more efficient processor for smoother multitasking. Buy the vivo Y76 5G if you prioritize quick top-ups and frequently find yourself needing to rapidly recharge your device, even if it means slightly less overall battery life.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Exynos 1330 in the Galaxy A17 tend to overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Exynos 1330’s 5nm fabrication process and efficient core architecture are designed to minimize thermal throttling. While some heat generation is inevitable during intensive tasks, the A17 should maintain stable performance for longer periods compared to devices with less efficient chipsets like the Dimensity 700.
❓ Is the 44W charging on the vivo Y76 5G truly a game-changer, or is it more of a marketing gimmick?
44W charging is undeniably faster than the A17’s 25W, allowing you to quickly top up the battery. However, the A17’s exceptional battery life reduces the need for frequent charging, making the speed advantage of the Y76 5G less critical for many users. It's beneficial for those who consistently run low on power and need a rapid boost.
❓ How does the Dimensity 700 handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile on the vivo Y76 5G?
The Dimensity 700 is capable of running PUBG Mobile, but you may need to lower graphics settings to achieve a consistently smooth frame rate. The Exynos 1330 in the A17 will likely offer a more stable and visually richer gaming experience due to its more powerful CPU and GPU.
