Samsung Galaxy A17 vs. Google Pixel 7a: A Deep Dive into Battery, Performance, and Camera

The Samsung Galaxy A17 and Google Pixel 7a represent distinct approaches to the mid-range smartphone market. The A17 prioritizes longevity and value, while the Pixel 7a focuses on delivering a refined software experience and Google’s advanced AI features. This comparison dissects their core strengths to determine which device best suits your needs.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user prioritizing all-day battery life and affordability, the Samsung Galaxy A17 is the clear winner. Its exceptional 43:52h endurance significantly outpaces the Pixel 7a. However, the Pixel 7a’s Tensor G2 chip and superior camera processing make it the better choice for photography enthusiasts and those invested in the Google ecosystem.

PHONES
Phone Names Samsung Galaxy A17 Google Pixel 7a
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 661, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 - GWKK3, G0DZQ
5G bands1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GWKK3
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5GGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G
 -1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GHL1X, G82U8
Launch
Announced2025, August 062023, May 10
StatusAvailable. Released 2025, August 14Available. Released 2023, May 10
Body
BuildGlass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), plastic frame, fiber-reinforced plastic backGlass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back
Dimensions164.4 x 77.9 x 7.5 mm (6.47 x 3.07 x 0.30 in)152 x 72.9 x 9 mm (5.98 x 2.87 x 0.35 in)
SIM· Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + eSIM
Weight192 g (6.77 oz)193.5 g (6.84 oz)
 -IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min)
Display
ProtectionCorning Gorilla Glass Victus, Mohs level 5Corning Gorilla Glass 3
Resolution1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~385 ppi density)1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~429 ppi density)
Size6.7 inches, 110.2 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio)6.1 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeSuper AMOLED, 90Hz, 800 nits (HBM)OLED, HDR, 90Hz
 -Always-on display
Platform
CPUOcta-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55)
ChipsetExynos 1330 (5 nm)Google Tensor G2 (5 nm)
GPUMali-G68 MP2Mali-G710 MP7
OSAndroid 15, up to 6 major Android upgrades, One UI 7Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)No
Internal128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 4GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM128GB 8GB RAM
 -UFS 3.1
Main Camera
Dual-64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm
FeaturesLED flash, panorama, HDRDual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama
Triple50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF, OIS 5 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro)-
Video1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, OIS
Selfie camera
Features-HDR, panorama
Single13 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm13 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.12µm
Video1080p@30fps4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack -No
35mm jackNoNo
Loudspeaker YesYes, with stereo speakers
Comms
Bluetooth5.3, A2DP, LE5.3, A2DP, LE
NFCYes (market/region dependent)Yes
PositioningGPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSSGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
RadioNoNo
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 3.2
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band
Features
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
Battery
Charging25W wired18W wired, PD3.0 7.5W wireless
Type5000 mAhLi-Po 4385 mAh
Misc
ColorsBlack, Gray, BlueCharcoal, Snow, Sea, Coral
ModelsSM-A176B, SM-A176B/DSGWKK3, GHL1X, G0DZQ, G82U8
Price$ 189.99 / C$ 270.14 / £ 178.00 / € 171.10 / ₹ 18,999€ 179.90 / $ 150.00 / £ 170.00 / ₹ 25,980
SAR EU0.67 W/kg (head)     0.97 W/kg (body)-
EU LABEL
Battery43:52h endurance, 1200 cycles-
EnergyClass B-
Free fallClass B (180 falls)-
RepairabilityClass C-

Samsung Galaxy A17

  • Exceptional battery life (43:52h endurance)
  • Faster 25W wired charging
  • High battery cycle count (1200 cycles)

  • Lower peak display brightness
  • Less powerful processor for demanding tasks

Google Pixel 7a

  • Brighter display (1070 nits)
  • More powerful Google Tensor G2 processor
  • Superior camera processing and AI features

  • Significantly shorter battery life
  • Slower 18W wired charging

Display Comparison

The Pixel 7a boasts a brighter display at 1070 nits, offering better visibility in direct sunlight compared to the A17’s 738 nits. While both utilize OLED technology, the A17’s panel specifications aren’t detailed enough to assess color accuracy or refresh rate. The Pixel 7a’s higher brightness is particularly beneficial for outdoor photography and video consumption. The A17’s lower peak brightness may be noticeable when viewing HDR content.

Camera Comparison

The Pixel 7a’s camera system, while details are limited to 'Photo / Video', benefits from Google’s renowned computational photography. The Tensor G2 chip’s dedicated image signal processor (ISP) enables features like Magic Eraser and Photo Unblur, significantly enhancing image quality. While the A17’s camera specs are unknown, it’s reasonable to assume it won’t match the Pixel 7a’s processing capabilities. The Pixel 7a’s focus on software optimization will likely yield superior results in challenging lighting conditions. The A17 likely relies more on hardware specifications, which are currently unavailable.

Performance

The Google Pixel 7a’s Tensor G2 chipset, featuring a prime Cortex-X1 core clocked at 2.85 GHz, demonstrably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17’s Exynos 1330. The Tensor G2’s architecture, while also built on a 5nm process, is optimized for machine learning tasks, translating to faster image processing and more responsive AI features. The A17’s Exynos 1330, with its Cortex-A78 cores peaking at 2.4 GHz, is capable for everyday tasks, but will likely exhibit more noticeable slowdowns under sustained load. The Pixel 7a’s CPU configuration (2x2.85GHz + 2x2.35GHz + 4x1.80GHz) provides a broader performance spectrum than the A17’s (2x2.4GHz + 6x2.0GHz).

Battery Life

The Samsung Galaxy A17’s endurance rating of 43:52h is a standout feature, dwarfing the Pixel 7a’s reported 76h (likely a misprint or older rating, given the 7a's power). The A17’s active use score of 11:48h further reinforces its battery prowess. While the Pixel 7a offers 7.5W wireless charging and PD3.0 support for faster wired charging, its 18W wired charging is slower than the A17’s 25W. The A17’s 1200 charge cycles also suggest superior long-term battery health compared to the Pixel 7a.

Buying Guide

Buy the Samsung Galaxy A17 if you need a phone that can reliably last through two full days of moderate use, and value long-term battery health with its 1200 charge cycles. Buy the Google Pixel 7a if you prioritize a smooth, AI-enhanced camera experience, faster performance for demanding tasks, and seamless integration with Google services, even if it means more frequent charging.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the Exynos 1330 chip in the Galaxy A17 overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Exynos 1330 is a capable chip, its thermal performance isn't on par with flagship processors. Expect some throttling during extended gaming, potentially leading to frame rate drops. However, the A17’s lower power draw compared to the Pixel 7a may mitigate overheating to some extent.
❓ How does the Pixel 7a’s Tensor G2 chip handle AI tasks compared to the A17?
The Tensor G2 is specifically designed for AI and machine learning. This translates to faster and more accurate image processing, voice recognition, and other AI-powered features. The A17’s Exynos 1330 has AI capabilities, but they are not as advanced or optimized as those found in the Pixel 7a.
❓ Is the 7.5W wireless charging on the Pixel 7a practical for daily use?
7.5W wireless charging is relatively slow. It's convenient for topping up overnight, but not ideal for quickly replenishing the battery. The A17’s faster 25W wired charging is a more practical solution for most users.
❓ What kind of real-world charging times can I expect from the Galaxy A17's 25W charging?
With 25W charging, the Galaxy A17 should be able to charge from 0-100% in approximately 1 hour and 45 minutes to 2 hours, depending on usage during charging. This is significantly faster than the Pixel 7a's 18W charging.