The Samsung Galaxy A17 4G and Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G represent compelling options in the crowded budget smartphone market. While both aim to deliver essential features at an accessible price, they take different approaches to achieving this. The A17 prioritizes long-lasting battery life, while the Redmi Note 13 focuses on a brighter, more visually appealing display. This comparison will dissect their key differences to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day battery life and longevity, the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G is the better choice. Its impressive 51:33h endurance and 1200 charge cycles significantly outperform the Redmi Note 13's battery performance. However, those who value a vibrant, bright display will find the Redmi Note 13 more appealing.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, September 18 | 2024, January 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, September 18 | Available. Released 2024, January 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus+), plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.4 x 77.9 x 7.5 mm (6.47 x 3.07 x 0.30 in) | 162.3 x 75.6 x 8 mm (6.39 x 2.98 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 188.5 g (6.67 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+, Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~385 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 110.2 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 90Hz | AMOLED, 120Hz, 960Hz PWM, 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 6 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS 2 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 4GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF, OIS
5 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | 108 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio (market/region dependent) | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 25W wired | 33W wired, 50% in 29 min, 100% in 70 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Gray, Light blue | Midnight Black, Mint Green, Ice Blue, Ocean Sunset |
| Models | SM-A175F, SM-A175F/DS, SM-A175M, SM-A175M/DS, SM-A175F/DSB | 23129RAA4G, 23124RA7EO, 23129RA5FL |
| Price | € 145.00 / $ 171.20 / £ 138.00 | $ 199.99 / £ 119.99 / € 135.52 |
| SAR | - | 0.98 W/kg (head) 0.49 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.37 W/kg (head) 1.18 W/kg (body) | 0.77 W/kg (head) 0.98 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL |
|---|
| Battery | 51:33h endurance, 1200 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class B (180 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Samsung Galaxy A17 4G
- Exceptional battery life (51:33h endurance)
- High battery cycle count (1200 cycles)
- Potentially better single-core performance with Helio G99
- Likely dimmer display compared to Redmi Note 13
- Slower charging speed (25W)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
- Very bright display (1313 nits)
- Faster charging (33W)
- Snapdragon 685 offers good efficiency
- Significantly shorter battery life (11:52h)
- Lower battery cycle count (unspecified)
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G immediately stands out with its significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak brightness of 1313 nits. This is a substantial advantage over what we'd expect from the A17, making it far more usable in direct sunlight. While the A17’s panel specifications are not provided, the Redmi Note 13’s brightness suggests a superior viewing experience for outdoor use. The A17 likely relies on software optimizations to compensate, but will struggle to match the Note 13’s raw luminance. Bezels are likely comparable given the price points, and color accuracy is an area where both phones will likely make compromises to maintain affordability.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is difficult to assess without detailed sensor information beyond the main lens. However, the Redmi Note 13’s brighter display will aid in framing shots and reviewing images. Both phones likely feature similar secondary cameras (depth, macro) of limited utility. The larger the primary sensor, the better the low-light performance, but this information is unavailable. Image processing styles will also differ; Samsung typically favors vibrant, saturated colors, while Xiaomi often aims for a more natural look. Without further data, it’s difficult to declare a clear winner, but the Redmi Note 13’s display provides a better previewing experience.
Performance
Under the hood, the Redmi Note 13 4G utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 685, built on a 6nm process, featuring four Cortex-A73 cores clocked at 2.8 GHz and four Cortex-A53 cores at 1.9 GHz. The Galaxy A17 4G, conversely, employs the MediaTek Helio G99 (also 6nm) with a dual-cluster configuration of two Cortex-A76 cores at 2.2 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores at 2.0 GHz. The A76 cores in the Helio G99 generally offer better single-core performance than the A73 cores in the Snapdragon 685, potentially leading to snappier app launches and smoother multitasking. However, the Redmi Note 13’s higher clock speeds on its primary cores could provide a boost in sustained performance. Both chipsets are adequate for everyday tasks, but the A17 may have a slight edge in demanding applications. Neither phone is a gaming powerhouse, but both should handle casual gaming adequately.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy A17 4G truly shines in battery endurance, boasting an impressive 51:33h of usage. This is significantly longer than the Redmi Note 13 4G’s active use score of 11:52h. Furthermore, the A17 is rated for 1200 charge cycles, indicating exceptional long-term battery health. While the Redmi Note 13 offers faster charging at 33W (50% in 29 minutes, 100% in 70 minutes) compared to the A17’s 25W, the A17’s sheer capacity and longevity outweigh the Redmi Note 13’s charging speed advantage for most users. The Redmi Note 13’s faster charging is convenient, but the A17’s battery will simply last much longer between charges.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G if you need exceptional battery life, anticipate heavy usage, or value a phone that will hold its charge for extended periods. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G if you prioritize a bright, easily visible display, frequently consume media outdoors, or prefer faster charging speeds.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the MediaTek Helio G99 in the Galaxy A17 4G tend to overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Helio G99 is generally a thermally efficient chip, especially when paired with the 6nm process. While it won't deliver flagship-level gaming performance, it should handle moderate gaming sessions without significant overheating. However, sustained, high-intensity gaming will likely lead to some throttling to manage temperatures.
❓ How does the 33W charging on the Redmi Note 13 4G compare to the 25W charging on the Galaxy A17 4G in real-world usage?
The Redmi Note 13 4G charges noticeably faster, reaching 50% in 29 minutes and 100% in 70 minutes. The Galaxy A17 4G will take considerably longer to fully charge. However, given the A17’s significantly larger battery endurance, the slower charging is less of a concern for most users, as they won't need to charge as frequently.
❓ Is the 2MP macro camera on either phone worth using for detailed close-up shots?
Generally, 2MP macro cameras on budget smartphones offer limited image quality. They often lack the detail and clarity needed for truly impressive close-up shots. While they can be fun to experiment with, don't expect professional-level results. The Redmi Note 13’s brighter display will help with framing, but the sensor itself is the limiting factor.
