The Samsung Galaxy A series offers fantastic value, but choosing between models can be tricky. Today, we're pitting the Galaxy A13 against the A32 to see which one delivers the best experience for your budget. Let's dive into a detailed comparison to help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Galaxy A32 edges out the A13 thanks to its brighter display and slightly more powerful chipset. While both offer excellent battery life, the A32's overall performance and screen quality make it the slightly better choice, especially if you prioritize visual clarity.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 04 | 2021, February 25 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 23 | Available. Released 2021, February 25 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 165.1 x 76.4 x 8.8 mm (6.5 x 3.01 x 0.35 in) | 158.9 x 73.6 x 8.4 mm (6.26 x 2.90 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 184 g (6.49 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~83.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | PLS LCD | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Exynos 850 (8 nm) | Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6.1 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, One UI 5 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 3GB RAM, 32GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 3GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
5 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | FM radio, RDS, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | Virtual proximity sensing | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Peach, Blue | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Blue, Awesome Violet |
| Models | SM-A135F, SM-A135F/DS, SM-A135M, SM-A135U, SM-A135U1, SM-A135N | SM-A325F, SM-A325F/DS, SM-A325M, SM-A325N |
| Price | € 94.99 / $ 129.99 / £ 89.00 | € 124.99 / £ 89.38 |
| SAR | 0.49 W/kg (head) | - |
| SAR EU | 0.37 W/kg (head) 1.39 W/kg (body) | 0.45 W/kg (head) 1.30 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 114h
|
Endurance rating 119h
|
| Camera |
Photo / Video |
Photo / Video |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: 1324:1 (nominal) |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker |
-29.7 LUFS (Average)
|
-30.3 LUFS (Below average)
|
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 122822 (v8), 136286 (v9)
GeekBench: 588 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 5.2fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
AnTuTu: 286666 (v8)
GeekBench: 1277 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 8.1fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Samsung Galaxy A13
- Exceptional battery life
- Reliable performance for basic tasks
- Affordable price
- Lower screen brightness
- Less powerful chipset
- Older design
Samsung Galaxy A32
- Brighter display
- Slightly more powerful chipset
- More vibrant colors
- Modern design
- Slightly higher price
- Battery life marginally less than A13
Display Comparison
The A32 boasts a significant advantage with its measured 814 nits max brightness compared to the A13's 587 nits. While both have excellent contrast ratios (1324:1 for A13, 'Infinite' for A32 - likely a marketing term), the A32's higher brightness makes it much more usable outdoors. The A32 also generally has a slightly more vibrant color reproduction.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature similar camera setups, typically including a main sensor, ultrawide, macro, and depth sensor. Image quality is generally comparable in good lighting conditions. Low-light performance is adequate on both, but not exceptional. Video recording capabilities are similar, with both offering 1080p recording.
Performance
The A32's MediaTek Helio G80 chipset, while on a slightly older 12nm process, generally outperforms the A13's Exynos 850 (8nm). The A32's dual Cortex-A75 cores provide a noticeable boost in responsiveness for demanding apps and games. The A13 is still capable for everyday tasks, but the A32 offers a smoother experience.
Battery Life
Both the A13 and A32 deliver exceptional battery life, with endurance ratings of 114h and 119h respectively. You can easily expect a full day of use, and potentially longer, on either device.
Buying Guide
The Samsung Galaxy A13 is ideal for users prioritizing maximum battery life and a simple, reliable experience. The Galaxy A32 is a better fit for those who want a brighter screen, a bit more processing power for smoother multitasking, and a slightly more modern design.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better gaming performance?
The Samsung Galaxy A32 generally offers better gaming performance due to its slightly more powerful Helio G80 chipset.
❓ Is the A13's battery life really that good?
Yes, the A13 is known for its outstanding battery life, easily lasting a full day even with heavy usage.
❓ Which phone has a better design?
The Samsung Galaxy A32 typically features a more modern and refined design compared to the A13.