Looking for an affordable Samsung smartphone? The Galaxy A13 and A04 are both contenders, but which one offers the best value? This detailed comparison breaks down their key features to help you make an informed decision.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Galaxy A13 emerges as the clear winner, boasting a significantly brighter display, a more powerful chipset, and a superior camera system. While the A04 is cheaper, the A13's overall performance and features justify the slightly higher price.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 04 | 2022, August 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 23 | Available. Released 2022, October 10 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 165.1 x 76.4 x 8.8 mm (6.5 x 3.01 x 0.35 in) | 164.4 x 76.3 x 9.1 mm (6.47 x 3.00 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 192 g (6.77 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~83.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | PLS LCD | PLS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Exynos 850 (8 nm) | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6.1 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, One UI Core 5.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 3GB RAM, 32GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 3GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM, 32GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.51", 0.7µm, AF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
5 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 5 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 5 MP, f/2.2, 28mm (wide), 1/5", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | Yes |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass | Accelerometer, proximity |
| | Virtual proximity sensing | - |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | - |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Peach, Blue | Black, Green, White, Copper |
| Models | SM-A135F, SM-A135F/DS, SM-A135M, SM-A135U, SM-A135U1, SM-A135N | SM-A045F, SM-A045F/DS, SM-A045M |
| Price | € 94.99 / $ 129.99 / £ 89.00 | About 70 EUR |
| SAR | 0.49 W/kg (head) | - |
| SAR EU | 0.37 W/kg (head) 1.39 W/kg (body) | 0.32 W/kg (head) 1.10 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 114h
| - |
| Camera |
Photo / Video | - |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: 1324:1 (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker |
-29.7 LUFS (Average)
| - |
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 122822 (v8), 136286 (v9)
GeekBench: 588 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 5.2fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Samsung Galaxy A13
- Brighter Display
- Faster Performance (Exynos 850)
- Likely Better Camera
- Good Battery Life
- Slightly Higher Price
- 15W Charging (relatively slow)
Samsung Galaxy A04
- Lower Price
- Good Battery Life
- Compact Size (likely)
- Slower Performance (Helio P35)
- Dim Display
- Less Capable Camera
Display Comparison
The A13's display shines with a measured 587 nits of brightness and a 1324:1 contrast ratio, offering a noticeably more vibrant and visible experience, especially outdoors. The A04's display is adequate but lacks the same level of brightness and contrast. Expect washed-out colors in direct sunlight.
Camera Comparison
While specific camera specs are missing for the A13, general knowledge indicates a more versatile and higher-resolution camera system. The A04's camera is adequate for basic snapshots, but struggles in low light and lacks advanced features. The A13 likely offers better image quality and more shooting modes.
Performance
The Exynos 850 in the A13 provides a considerable performance advantage over the Helio P35 in the A04. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and a more responsive user experience on the A13. The A04 can feel sluggish at times, particularly with demanding apps.
Battery Life
Both phones offer impressive battery life, with the A13 boasting an endurance rating of 114 hours. The A04, while not explicitly stated, is expected to have good battery life due to its less power-hungry chipset. Both should easily last a full day on a single charge.
Buying Guide
The Samsung Galaxy A13 is ideal for users who prioritize a better display, faster performance, and a more capable camera. The Galaxy A04 is a good option for those on a very tight budget who need basic smartphone functionality and extended battery life.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Samsung Galaxy A13 is significantly better for gaming due to its more powerful chipset.
❓ Is the A04 worth buying if I'm on a very tight budget?
Yes, the A04 can be a decent option if your budget is extremely limited and you only need basic smartphone functionality.