Samsung Galaxy A12 Nacho vs Xiaomi Redmi 10 5G: A Deep Dive into Budget 5G

The Samsung Galaxy A12 Nacho and Xiaomi Redmi 10 5G represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive sub-$200 5G smartphone market. Both aim to deliver 5G connectivity without breaking the bank, but they achieve this with different approaches to chipset design and feature prioritization. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device offers the best value.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user prioritizing overall performance and 5G responsiveness, the Xiaomi Redmi 10 5G emerges as the stronger contender. Its Mediatek Dimensity 700, built on a more efficient 7nm process, provides a noticeable performance uplift over the Samsung’s Exynos 850, despite both featuring similar core counts. However, Samsung’s brand recognition and software experience may appeal to some.

PHONES
Phone Names Samsung Galaxy A12 Nacho Xiaomi Redmi 10 5G
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 411, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41
5G bands-1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA
SpeedHSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 MbpsHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTEGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G
Launch
Announced2021, August 092022, March 29
StatusAvailable. Released 2021, August 09Available. Released 2022, September 23
Body
BuildGlass front, plastic back, plastic frame-
Dimensions164 x 75.8 x 8.9 mm (6.46 x 2.98 x 0.35 in)164 x 76.1 x 8.9 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.35 in)
SIM· Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight205 g (7.23 oz)200 g (7.05 oz)
Display
Protection-Corning Gorilla Glass 3
Resolution720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density)1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density)
Size6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~82.1% screen-to-body ratio)6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~83.6% screen-to-body ratio)
TypePLS LCDIPS LCD, 90Hz
Platform
CPUOcta-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
ChipsetExynos 850 (8 nm)Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm)
GPUMali-G52Mali-G57 MC2
OSAndroid 11, upgradable to Android 13, One UI 5.1Android 12, MIUI 13
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXC (dedicated slot)microSDXC (dedicated slot)
Internal32GB 3GB RAM, 32GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 3GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM
 eMMC 5.1UFS 2.2
Main Camera
Dual-50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens
FeaturesLED flash, panorama, HDRLED flash, HDR, panorama
Quad48 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), AF 5 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens-
Single8 MP, f/2.25 MP, f/2.2
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Selfie camera
Features-HDR
Single8 MP, f/2.25 MP, f/2.2
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack YesYes
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker YesYes
 -24-bit/192kHz audio
Comms
Bluetooth5.0, A2DP, LE5.1, A2DP, LE
Infrared port-Yes
NFCYes (market/region dependent)Yes (market/region dependent)
PositioningGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDSGPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO
RadioFM radio, RDS, recordingFM radio
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometerFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass
 Virtual proximity sensing-
Battery
Charging15W wired18W wired
TypeLi-Po 5000 mAhLi-Po 5000 mAh
Misc
ColorsBlack, Blue, RedGraphite Gray, Chrome Silver, Aurora Green
ModelsSM-A127F/DSN, SM-A127F/DS, SM-A127F, SM-A127M, SM-A127U22041219G, 22041219NY
PriceAbout 130 EURAbout 100 EUR
SAR-1.09 W/kg (head)     1.09 W/kg (body)
SAR EU0.67 W/kg (head)     1.38 W/kg (body)0.60 W/kg (head)     0.99 W/kg (body)

Samsung Galaxy A12 Nacho

  • Familiar Samsung One UI experience
  • Established brand reputation
  • Potentially wider carrier compatibility

  • Less powerful Exynos 850 chipset
  • Slower 15W charging
  • 8nm process less efficient than 7nm

Xiaomi Redmi 10 5G

  • More powerful Mediatek Dimensity 700 chipset
  • Faster 18W charging
  • 7nm process for better efficiency

  • Xiaomi’s MIUI software can be polarizing
  • Potentially less brand recognition in some markets
  • May require more software updates

Display Comparison

Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely utilize LCD panels, a common cost-saving measure in this segment. The focus here isn't on visual fidelity. However, the lack of detailed display specs necessitates a focus on the chipset's ability to drive the UI smoothly. The Redmi 10 5G’s more powerful GPU, stemming from the Dimensity 700, will likely translate to slightly smoother scrolling and animations, even if the resolution and refresh rates are similar.

Camera Comparison

Both phones likely feature a multi-camera setup, but detailed sensor information is limited. It’s safe to assume both will include a primary sensor, an ultrawide, and potentially macro/depth sensors. Given the price point, image quality will be heavily reliant on software processing. The Redmi 10 5G’s more powerful ISP (Image Signal Processor) within the Dimensity 700 chipset could offer an advantage in dynamic range and noise reduction, especially in low-light conditions. The presence of a more capable chipset suggests better computational photography capabilities.

Performance

The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Redmi 10 5G’s Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7nm) utilizes a more modern architecture with 2x Cortex-A76 performance cores alongside 6x Cortex-A55 efficiency cores. This contrasts with the Samsung Galaxy A12 Nacho’s Exynos 850 (8nm), which employs 8x Cortex-A55 cores. The A76 cores in the Dimensity 700 offer significantly higher single-core performance, crucial for app launch times and responsiveness. The 7nm fabrication process also contributes to better power efficiency, potentially leading to longer sustained performance under load. This means the Redmi 10 5G is better suited for demanding tasks like gaming and video editing.

Battery Life

The Redmi 10 5G’s 18W charging is a slight advantage over the A12 Nacho’s 15W charging. While neither is exceptionally fast by today’s standards, the 18W charging will reduce the time to reach a full charge. The actual battery life will depend on usage patterns and the efficiency of the respective chipsets. The Dimensity 700’s 7nm process should contribute to better power efficiency, potentially offsetting any difference in battery capacity (which isn't specified in the provided data).

Buying Guide

Buy the Samsung Galaxy A12 Nacho if you prioritize a familiar Android experience with Samsung’s One UI and value brand recognition. It’s a solid choice for basic smartphone tasks and media consumption. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi 10 5G if you prioritize performance for gaming and multitasking, and want a more modern chipset architecture that delivers better efficiency and 5G speeds. It’s ideal for users who want more from their budget 5G phone.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the Exynos 850 in the Samsung A12 Nacho struggle with demanding games like PUBG?
The Exynos 850 is a capable chip for basic tasks, but it will likely struggle with graphically intensive games like PUBG at higher settings. Expect frame drops and potentially noticeable lag. The Redmi 10 5G’s Dimensity 700 offers a significantly better gaming experience due to its more powerful GPU and CPU.
❓ Is the 5G connectivity on the Redmi 10 5G reliable and compatible with all 5G networks?
The Redmi 10 5G supports a wide range of 5G bands, but compatibility will depend on your carrier and region. It’s crucial to check with your carrier to ensure the phone supports the specific 5G frequencies they use. The Dimensity 700 chipset includes an integrated 5G modem known for its reliable performance.
❓ How does Xiaomi’s MIUI software compare to Samsung’s One UI in terms of bloatware and updates?
MIUI is known for being feature-rich but often comes with pre-installed apps (bloatware). Samsung’s One UI generally offers a cleaner experience with less bloatware. Historically, Samsung has provided more consistent and timely software updates compared to Xiaomi, although Xiaomi has been improving in this area.