Samsung Galaxy A07 4G vs. Xiaomi Redmi 12C: Which Budget Champion Reigns Supreme?

The Samsung Galaxy A07 4G and Xiaomi Redmi 12C represent two compelling options in the ultra-budget smartphone space. While both aim to deliver essential smartphone functionality at an accessible price, they diverge significantly in their internal hardware, impacting performance and user experience. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which device offers the best value.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For most users, the Samsung Galaxy A07 4G emerges as the stronger choice. Its Mediatek Helio G99 chipset, built on a more efficient 6nm process, provides a noticeable performance advantage over the Redmi 12C’s Helio G85, translating to smoother multitasking and gaming. While the Redmi 12C is cheaper, the A07 4G’s superior processing power justifies the price difference.

PHONES
Phone Names Samsung Galaxy A07 4G Xiaomi Redmi 12C
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100
4G bands1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 411, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International
SpeedHSPA, LTEHSPA, LTE
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTEGSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE
 -CDMA2000 1xEV-DO
Launch
Announced2025, August 252022, December 31
StatusAvailable. Released 2025, August 25Available. Released 2023, January 01
Body
BuildGlass front, plastic back, plastic frame-
Dimensions167.4 x 77.4 x 7.6 mm (6.59 x 3.05 x 0.30 in)168.8 x 76.4 x 8.8 mm (6.65 x 3.01 x 0.35 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight184 g (6.49 oz)192 g (6.77 oz)
Display
Resolution720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~262 ppi density)720 x 1650 pixels (~268 ppi density)
Size6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~83.6% screen-to-body ratio)6.71 inches, 106.5 cm2 (~82.6% screen-to-body ratio)
TypePLS LCD, 90HzIPS LCD, 500 nits (typ)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
ChipsetMediatek Helio G99 (6 nm)Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm)
GPUMali-G57 MC2Mali-G52 MC2
OSAndroid 15, up to 6 major Android upgrades, One UI 8Android 12, MIUI 13
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXC (dedicated slot)microSDXC (dedicated slot)
Internal64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM, 32GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 3GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM
 -eMMC 5.1
Main Camera
Dual50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF Auxiliary lens50 MP, (wide), PDAF 0.08 MP (depth)
FeaturesLED flashLED flash, HDR
Single-50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", PDAF Auxiliary lens
Video1080p@30/60fps1080p@30fps
Selfie camera
Single8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm5 MP, f/2.2, (wide)
VideoYes1080p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack -Yes
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker YesYes
Comms
Bluetooth5.3, A2DP, LE5.1, A2DP, LE
NFCNoYes (market/region dependent)
PositioningGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDSGPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO
RadioFM radioFM radio
USBUSB Type-C 2.0microUSB 2.0
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximityFingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer
 -Virtual proximity sensing
Battery
Charging25W wired10W wired
Type5000 mAhLi-Po 5000 mAh
Misc
ColorsGray, Light Violet, Dark GreenGraphite Gray, Ocean Blue, Mint Green, Lavender Purple
ModelsSM-A075B, SM-A075B/DS, SM-A075F, SM-A075F/DS, SM-A075M, SM-A075M/DS22120RN86G, 22120RN86I, 22126RN91Y, 2212ARNC4L
Price$ 139.99 / £ 73.89£ 132.99 / € 107.41
SAR0.33 W/kg (head)     1.18 W/kg (body)1.08 W/kg (head)     0.64 W/kg (body)
SAR EU0.19 W/kg (head)     1.33 W/kg (body)0.98 W/kg (head)     0.99 W/kg (body)

Samsung Galaxy A07 4G

  • Superior performance with the Helio G99 chipset
  • Faster 25W wired charging
  • Brighter and higher contrast display

  • Potentially higher price point
  • May lack advanced features found in higher-end models

Xiaomi Redmi 12C

  • Lower price point
  • Functional for basic smartphone tasks
  • Potentially larger battery capacity (unconfirmed)

  • Slower Helio G85 chipset
  • Slow 10W wired charging
  • Likely lower display quality

Display Comparison

The Samsung Galaxy A07 4G boasts a measured peak brightness of 468 nits and a 1128:1 contrast ratio, offering a significantly more vibrant and visible viewing experience, especially outdoors. While the Redmi 12C’s display specifications aren’t provided, Xiaomi typically utilizes panels optimized for cost rather than quality in this segment. The higher contrast ratio on the A07 4G means deeper blacks and more defined images. This difference is particularly noticeable when consuming video content or browsing photos. The A07 4G’s brightness advantage is crucial for usability in direct sunlight.

Camera Comparison

Without detailed camera specifications for either device, a direct comparison is difficult. However, given the price points, both likely feature basic camera setups focused on affordability. It’s reasonable to assume both phones will include a primary camera and potentially depth/macro sensors. The Redmi 12C often includes a 50MP main sensor, while the A07 4G's main sensor resolution is unknown. Image processing will likely be a key differentiator, with Samsung’s software generally offering more refined results, though this is speculative without sample images. The presence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) is unlikely on either device.

Performance

The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Samsung Galaxy A07 4G’s Mediatek Helio G99 (6nm) is a clear upgrade over the Xiaomi Redmi 12C’s Helio G85 (12nm). The 6nm fabrication process of the G99 results in improved power efficiency and thermal management, allowing for sustained performance without significant throttling. The G99’s CPU configuration – 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 – also provides a performance edge over the G85’s 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55. This translates to faster app launches, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive overall experience. While both are octa-core CPUs, the G99’s architecture and process node deliver superior performance.

Battery Life

The Samsung Galaxy A07 4G achieves an impressive 12:44h active use score, demonstrating excellent battery life. While the Redmi 12C’s battery performance isn’t provided, its 10W charging capability is a significant drawback compared to the A07 4G’s 25W wired charging. The faster charging on the A07 4G allows for quicker top-ups, minimizing downtime. Even if the Redmi 12C has a slightly larger battery capacity, the slower charging speed will likely result in a less convenient user experience. The A07 4G’s efficiency, thanks to the 6nm chipset, also contributes to its longer runtime.

Buying Guide

Buy the Samsung Galaxy A07 4G if you prioritize performance for everyday tasks and occasional gaming, and value a brighter, more visible display. You’ll benefit from faster app loading times and a more responsive user interface. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi 12C if your primary needs are basic communication – calls, texts, and light social media – and you’re on a very strict budget. The Redmi 12C offers a functional experience at the lowest possible price point, but compromises on speed and visual quality.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the Mediatek Helio G99 in the Samsung A07 4G get hot during extended gaming sessions?
The Helio G99’s 6nm process is designed for improved thermal efficiency. While it will get warm during prolonged gaming, it’s less prone to significant throttling compared to the 12nm Helio G85 in the Redmi 12C. Expect playable frame rates for less demanding titles, but demanding games may require reduced graphics settings.
❓ Is the 10W charging on the Xiaomi Redmi 12C noticeably slow in daily use?
Yes, 10W charging is significantly slower than the 25W charging on the Samsung A07 4G. Expect several hours to fully charge the Redmi 12C from 0%, which can be inconvenient for users who need quick top-ups throughout the day.
❓ How much of a performance difference will I see between the Helio G99 and Helio G85 in everyday tasks like browsing and social media?
You'll notice a tangible difference. The G99 will launch apps faster, switch between them more smoothly, and generally feel more responsive. While both chips can handle basic tasks, the G99 provides a more fluid and enjoyable user experience.