The Samsung Galaxy A07 4G and Oppo A57s represent compelling options in the ultra-budget smartphone segment. While both aim to deliver essential smartphone functionality at a low price point, they diverge significantly in their internal hardware, particularly in chipset and charging capabilities. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which device offers the best value for your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Samsung Galaxy A07 4G emerges as the stronger choice. Its Mediatek Helio G99 chipset, built on a more efficient 6nm process, provides a noticeable performance advantage over the Oppo A57s’ Helio G35. While the Oppo A57s boasts faster 33W charging, the A07 4G’s superior processing power and respectable 12:44h active use battery life make it the more well-rounded device.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, August 25 | 2022, August 31 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, August 25 | Available. Released 2022, September 12 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Panda Glass), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 167.4 x 77.4 x 7.6 mm (6.59 x 3.05 x 0.30 in) | 163.8 x 75 x 8 mm (6.45 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 184 g (6.49 oz) | 187 g (6.60 oz) |
| | - | IP5X (dust), IPX4 (water) resistance |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Panda Glass |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~262 ppi density) | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~83.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | PLS LCD, 90Hz | IPS LCD, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) | Mediatek MT6765G Helio G35 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 6 major Android upgrades, One UI 8 | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | Panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 25W wired | 33W wired, 100% in 69 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Gray, Light Violet, Dark Green | Starry Black, Sky Blue |
| Models | SM-A075B, SM-A075B/DS, SM-A075F, SM-A075F/DS, SM-A075M, SM-A075M/DS | CPH2385 |
| Price | $ 139.99 / £ 73.89 | - |
| SAR | 0.33 W/kg (head) 1.18 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 0.19 W/kg (head) 1.33 W/kg (body) | - |
Samsung Galaxy A07 4G
- Superior processor performance with the Helio G99
- Longer battery life during active use (12:44h)
- More efficient 6nm chipset for better thermal management
- Slower charging speed (25W)
- Likely less refined camera processing
Oppo A57s
- Faster 33W charging (100% in 69 minutes)
- Potentially lower price point
- Sufficient for basic smartphone tasks
- Less powerful Helio G35 chipset
- Less efficient 12nm process
- Likely shorter battery life during active use
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A07 4G features a display capable of reaching 468 nits of peak brightness, offering adequate visibility outdoors. While the Oppo A57s’ brightness isn’t specified, it’s likely comparable. However, the A07 4G’s 1128:1 contrast ratio suggests a more vibrant image. Neither phone is expected to feature advanced display technologies like LTPO, but the A07 4G’s measured brightness gives it a slight edge for outdoor usability. Bezels are likely similar on both devices, given their price point, and color accuracy is unlikely to be a strong suit for either.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is difficult. However, both phones likely employ similar budget camera setups. It’s reasonable to assume both feature a primary camera, an ultrawide, and potentially a depth or macro sensor. Given the focus on cost reduction, image processing will likely be basic on both devices. The presence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) is unlikely on either phone. The A07 4G’s chipset may offer slightly better image signal processing capabilities, but the difference will likely be minimal in real-world scenarios. The usefulness of any 2MP macro sensors on either device is questionable.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Samsung Galaxy A07 4G’s Mediatek Helio G99 (6nm) is a significantly more modern and efficient processor than the Oppo A57s’ Mediatek MT6765G Helio G35 (12nm). The G99 utilizes two Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz alongside six Cortex-A55 cores at 2.0 GHz, providing a substantial uplift in CPU performance compared to the G35’s four Cortex-A53 cores at 2.3 GHz and another four at 1.8 GHz. The larger process node of the G35 also implies higher power consumption and potentially more thermal throttling under sustained load. This translates to smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and a more responsive user experience on the A07 4G.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy A07 4G achieves an impressive 12:44h of active use, demonstrating solid battery endurance. The Oppo A57s doesn’t have a comparable active use score, but its 33W wired charging offers a significant advantage over the A07 4G’s 25W charging. The A57s can reach 100% charge in just 69 minutes, while the A07 4G will take longer. However, the A07 4G’s longer battery life means you may not need to charge it as frequently, mitigating the charging speed difference.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Galaxy A07 4G if you prioritize overall performance for multitasking, streaming, and light gaming, and value longer battery life during active use. Buy the Oppo A57s if rapid charging is your absolute top priority and you primarily use your phone for basic tasks like calls, texts, and social media, and are willing to trade some processing power for that convenience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Helio G35 in the Oppo A57s struggle with demanding apps like PUBG Mobile?
Yes, the Helio G35 is a relatively low-end chipset. While it can run PUBG Mobile, you'll likely need to use low graphics settings and may experience frame drops during intense gameplay. The Helio G99 in the A07 4G will provide a significantly smoother gaming experience.
❓ How much faster is the 33W charging on the Oppo A57s compared to the 25W charging on the Samsung Galaxy A07 4G?
The Oppo A57s can reach a full charge in approximately 69 minutes. The Samsung Galaxy A07 4G, with its 25W charging, will take considerably longer – likely exceeding 90 minutes, potentially closer to two hours, depending on the battery capacity. This is a substantial difference for users who prioritize quick top-ups.
❓ Is the difference between the 6nm and 12nm process nodes significant for everyday use?
Yes, the 6nm process node of the Helio G99 is more efficient, meaning it consumes less power for the same level of performance. This translates to better battery life and less heat generation during prolonged use, resulting in more consistent performance and less throttling.
