The Samsung Galaxy A06 and the vivo Y22s (European variant) represent compelling options in the ultra-budget smartphone segment. Both aim to deliver essential smartphone functionality at a low price point, but they take different approaches to achieving this. The A06 relies on MediaTek's Helio G85, while the Y22s utilizes Qualcomm's Snapdragon 680, creating a key point of differentiation in performance and efficiency.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing efficiency and sustained performance, the vivo Y22s (Europe) is the better choice. Its Snapdragon 680, built on a 6nm process, offers a noticeable advantage over the Galaxy A06’s 12nm Helio G85, translating to better thermal management and potentially longer battery life despite a slightly slower charging speed.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, August 16 | 2022, November 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, August 22 | Available. Released 2022, November 17 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 167.3 x 77.3 x 8 mm (6.59 x 3.04 x 0.31 in) | 164.3 x 76.1 x 8.4 mm (6.47 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 189 g (6.67 oz) | 192 g (6.77 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~262 ppi density) | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~83.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.1 cm2 (~82.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | PLS LCD | IPS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G85 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 14, up to 2 major Android upgrades, One UI 8 | Android 12, Funtouch 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 25W wired | 18W wired, 70% in 70 min
Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Blue, Gold, White | Summer Cyan, Starlit Blue |
| Models | SM-A065F, SM-A065F/DS, SM-A065M, SM-A065M/DS | - |
| Price | € 81.90 / $ 99.99 / £ 66.89 / ₹ 7,749 | About 250 EUR |
| SAR EU | 0.44 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) | 0.98 W/kg (head) 1.17 W/kg (body) |
Samsung Galaxy A06
- Faster 25W wired charging
- Slightly brighter display (564 nits)
- Established Samsung brand reputation
- Less efficient 12nm Helio G85 chipset
- Potential for thermal throttling
- No reverse wired charging
vivo Y22s (Europe)
- More efficient 6nm Snapdragon 680 chipset
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Potentially better sustained performance
- Slower 18W wired charging
- Display brightness not specified
- Less well-known brand in some markets
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A06 boasts a display capable of reaching 564 nits of peak brightness, providing adequate visibility outdoors. Its 1484:1 contrast ratio suggests decent black levels, though the panel technology isn't specified, likely being a standard IPS LCD. The vivo Y22s’ display specifications are not provided, making a direct brightness comparison difficult. However, given the price bracket, it’s likely comparable. The A06’s higher peak brightness gives it a slight edge for users who frequently use their phones in direct sunlight.
Camera Comparison
Neither device is expected to excel in photography. Details regarding camera sensors are absent, but in this price range, image quality is largely dependent on software processing. Without sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to make a meaningful comparison. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is unlikely to significantly enhance the photography experience. The focus should be on the main sensor’s performance, which remains unknown for both models.
Performance
This is where the most significant difference lies. The vivo Y22s is equipped with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 (6nm), featuring a Kryo CPU with 4x2.4 GHz Gold and 4x1.9 GHz Silver cores. This 6nm fabrication process is considerably more efficient than the 12nm process used in the Samsung Galaxy A06’s MediaTek Helio G85 (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55). The Snapdragon 680’s architecture, with its focus on efficiency, will likely result in better sustained performance and less thermal throttling during demanding tasks like gaming. While the A06’s Cortex-A75 cores offer higher peak clock speeds, the Snapdragon 680’s overall architecture and process node provide a more balanced and efficient experience.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy A06 supports 25W wired charging, a faster rate than the vivo Y22s’ 18W charging. The Y22s claims to reach 70% charge in 70 minutes, suggesting a full charge takes around 90-100 minutes. The A06’s charging time is not specified. However, the Snapdragon 680’s superior efficiency in the Y22s could offset the slower charging speed, potentially resulting in comparable real-world battery life. The Y22s also offers reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the A06, allowing it to charge other devices.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Galaxy A06 if you prioritize faster wired charging (25W) and a slightly brighter display, and are comfortable with potentially more noticeable thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions. Buy the vivo Y22s (Europe) if you value a more efficient processor, potentially longer battery life, and the convenience of reverse wired charging, even if it means a slower 18W charging speed.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Helio G85 in the Galaxy A06 overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The 12nm Helio G85 is known to generate more heat than newer, more efficient chipsets. While casual gaming should be fine, extended gaming sessions with demanding titles on the Galaxy A06 are likely to result in noticeable thermal throttling, reducing performance to prevent overheating.
❓ How useful is the reverse wired charging feature on the vivo Y22s?
The 18W reverse wired charging on the Y22s is a convenient feature for topping up accessories like wireless earbuds or smartwatches. While it won't rapidly charge another phone, it can provide a crucial boost in emergency situations, offering a practical advantage over the A06 which lacks this capability.
❓ Does the Snapdragon 680 in the Y22s support 90fps gaming in popular titles like PUBG?
While the Snapdragon 680 is capable, achieving a consistent 90fps in PUBG will depend on the graphics settings. Expect to play at medium settings for a smoother experience. The A06's Helio G85 will likely struggle to maintain even 60fps consistently on higher settings.
❓ Is the difference in charging speed between 18W and 25W significant in real-world use?
While 25W is faster on paper, the difference isn't massive. The Y22s' 70% in 70 minutes translates to a full charge in around 90-100 minutes. The A06's 25W charging will likely be around 70-80 minutes. The Snapdragon 680's efficiency may mean you don't notice the slower charging as much.
