Google Pixel 7a vs Samsung Galaxy A05: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Google Pixel 7a is the superior choice. Its Tensor G2 chipset delivers significantly faster performance and superior camera capabilities. While the Galaxy A05 offers a lower price point, the Pixel 7a’s overall experience justifies the price difference.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Samsung Galaxy A05 | Google Pixel 7a |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 - GWKK3, G0DZQ |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GWKK3 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GHL1X, G82U8 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, September 25 | 2023, May 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, October 15 | Available. Released 2023, May 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 168.8 x 78.2 x 8.8 mm (6.65 x 3.08 x 0.35 in) | 152 x 72.9 x 9 mm (5.98 x 2.87 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 193.5 g (6.84 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~262 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~429 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~82.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | PLS LCD | OLED, HDR, 90Hz |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G85 (12 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.64µm, AF Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 13 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Video | Yes | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 25W wired | 18W wired, PD3.0 7.5W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4385 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Silver, Light Green | Charcoal, Snow, Sea, Coral |
| Models | SM-A055F, SM-A055F/DS, SM-A055M, SM-A055M/DS | GWKK3, GHL1X, G0DZQ, G82U8 |
| Price | $ 100.00 / C$ 119.94 / £ 67.98 / € 96.07 | € 179.90 / $ 150.00 / £ 170.00 / ₹ 25,980 |
| SAR EU | 0.41 W/kg (head) 1.19 W/kg (body) | - |
Samsung Galaxy A05
- Faster processor for smoother performance
- Superior camera quality with Google’s image processing
- Brighter and more vibrant display
- Higher price point
- Slower charging speed (18W)
Google Pixel 7a
- More affordable price
- Faster wired charging (25W)
- Potentially longer battery life due to lower power consumption
- Significantly slower processor
- Inferior camera quality
- Less vibrant display
Display Comparison
The Pixel 7a boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1070 nits, compared to the Galaxy A05’s unspecified brightness. This translates to better visibility outdoors. While the A05’s panel type isn’t specified, it’s likely a standard LCD, lacking the color accuracy and contrast of the Pixel 7a’s OLED. The Pixel 7a’s 90Hz refresh rate (not specified for A05) also contributes to a smoother scrolling experience, though the A05 may prioritize battery life with a 60Hz panel.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 7a excels in camera performance thanks to Google’s renowned computational photography. While specific sensor details aren’t provided, the Pixel 7a’s image processing algorithms compensate for potentially smaller sensors, delivering excellent dynamic range and low-light performance. The Galaxy A05’s camera system is likely more basic, focusing on affordability rather than image quality. The A05 may include a 2MP macro lens, which often produces underwhelming results, while the Pixel 7a prioritizes a strong primary sensor and intelligent software.
Performance
The performance gap between these devices is substantial. The Google Pixel 7a’s Tensor G2 (5nm) features a prime Cortex-X1 core clocked at 2.85 GHz, alongside A78 and A55 cores, offering a significant leap in processing power over the Galaxy A05’s MediaTek Helio G85 (12nm). The Helio G85, with its Cortex-A75 and A55 cores, is geared towards efficiency but struggles with demanding tasks. The Tensor G2’s 5nm fabrication process also provides better thermal efficiency, reducing throttling during sustained workloads. This means the Pixel 7a will handle gaming and multitasking far more effectively.
Battery Life
The Pixel 7a has an endurance rating of 76 hours, indicating solid battery life despite its 18W wired charging and 7.5W wireless charging. The Galaxy A05 counters with 25W wired charging, potentially offering faster top-ups, but its battery capacity isn’t specified. The Tensor G2’s efficiency helps mitigate the lower charging wattage, while the A05’s Helio G85 may require more frequent charging due to its lower efficiency.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Galaxy A05 if you prioritize extreme affordability and need a functional smartphone for basic tasks like calls, texts, and light social media use. Buy the Google Pixel 7a if you value a high-quality camera, smooth performance for demanding apps, and Google’s intelligent software features, even if it means spending more.