Looking for an affordable smartphone that doesn't completely break the bank? The Samsung Galaxy A04 and Oppo A57s are both contenders in the budget phone arena. But which one reigns supreme? Let's dive into a detailed comparison to help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo A57s edges out the Galaxy A04 thanks to its significantly faster charging and slightly improved chipset. While both offer basic functionality, the A57s' 33W charging is a game-changer for those needing a quick power boost. Both are solid choices for budget-conscious users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, August 24 | 2022, August 31 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, October 10 | Available. Released 2022, September 12 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Panda Glass), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.4 x 76.3 x 9.1 mm (6.47 x 3.00 x 0.36 in) | 163.8 x 75 x 8 mm (6.45 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 187 g (6.60 oz) |
| | - | IP5X (dust), IPX4 (water) resistance |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Panda Glass |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | PLS LCD | IPS LCD, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6765G Helio G35 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, One UI Core 5.0 | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 32GB 3GB RAM, 32GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.51", 0.7µm, AF
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2 | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | Panorama |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, 28mm (wide), 1/5", 1.12µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 33W wired, 100% in 69 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Green, White, Copper | Starry Black, Sky Blue |
| Models | SM-A045F, SM-A045F/DS, SM-A045M | CPH2385 |
| Price | About 70 EUR | - |
| SAR EU | 0.32 W/kg (head) 1.10 W/kg (body) | - |
Samsung Galaxy A04
- Trusted Samsung brand
- Decent battery life
- Expandable storage (likely via microSD)
- Familiar Samsung UI
- Slow charging
- Basic performance
- Lower screen quality compared to some competitors
- Potentially outdated software updates
Oppo A57s
- Faster 33W charging
- Slightly better performance (Helio G35)
- Modern design
- Good battery life
- Less well-known brand (compared to Samsung)
- Camera performance may not be exceptional
- Potential for fewer software updates compared to Samsung
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.5-inch display, likely with an HD+ resolution. Expect decent viewing angles and color reproduction for everyday use, but don't anticipate flagship-level quality. The A57s might have a slightly brighter panel, but detailed specifications are needed for a definitive comparison.
Camera Comparison
The Galaxy A04 likely features a triple camera setup (main, ultrawide, macro), while the Oppo A57s probably has a dual camera setup (main, depth). Image quality will be adequate in good lighting conditions, but expect noise and limited detail in low light. The A57s might offer slightly better image processing due to its newer chipset.
Performance
While both utilize the Mediatek Helio P35, the Oppo A57s boasts the 'G' variant (Helio G35). The 'G' series typically indicates a slight performance boost, particularly in graphics, making the A57s marginally faster for gaming and multitasking. However, neither phone is a powerhouse.
Battery Life
Both phones likely have a 5000mAh battery, providing all-day battery life for moderate users. However, the Oppo A57s' 33W fast charging is a significant advantage, allowing for much quicker top-ups compared to the A04's standard charging.
Buying Guide
The Samsung Galaxy A04 is ideal for users prioritizing a trusted brand and basic smartphone functionality. The Oppo A57s is a better choice for those who value faster charging speeds and a slightly more modern chipset, even within the budget category.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better battery life?
Both have a 5000mAh battery, offering all-day usage. However, the Oppo A57s charges significantly faster, making it more convenient.
❓ Is the Samsung Galaxy A04 worth buying?
It's a decent option if you prioritize brand recognition and a familiar user interface, but be aware of its slow charging and basic performance.
