The Samsung Galaxy A04 Core and Motorola Moto E40 represent the extreme end of the smartphone price spectrum. Both aim to deliver essential smartphone functionality at a minimal cost, but they take different approaches to achieving this. This comparison dissects their core components to determine which offers the best value for users prioritizing performance, battery life, or overall usability.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Samsung Galaxy A04 Core emerges as the better choice. Its Exynos 850 chipset, built on an 8nm process, provides a noticeable performance advantage over the Motorola Moto E40’s Unisoc T700, translating to smoother multitasking and app loading. While the Moto E40 offers slightly slower charging, the A04 Core’s superior processing power makes it the more versatile device.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 19, 28, 40, 66 - Brazil |
| Speed | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | Not announced yet | 2021, October 07 |
| Status | Cancelled | Available. Released 2021, October 11 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | - | 165.1 x 75.7 x 9.1 mm (6.5 x 2.98 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 198 g (6.98 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | PLS LCD | IPS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core 1.8 GHz |
| Chipset | Exynos 850 (8 nm) | Unisoc T700 |
| GPU | Mali-G52 | Mali G52 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 11 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 3GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, AF | - |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2 | 8 MP, f/2.0 |
| Video | - | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Green, Rose Gold | Carbon Gray, Pink Clay |
| Price | - | About 90 EUR |
Samsung Galaxy A04 Core
- More powerful Exynos 850 chipset
- 8nm fabrication process for better efficiency
- Potential for better software optimization
- Charging speed not explicitly stated
- Likely similar camera performance to Moto E40
Motorola Moto E40
- Lower upfront cost
- Simple and straightforward user experience
- Acceptable for basic communication tasks
- Unisoc T700 chipset offers limited performance
- Slow 10W wired charging
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Specifics regarding panel type (IPS vs. TFT) and resolution are missing for both, but given the price point, IPS is likely on the A04 Core. The focus here isn't on visual fidelity. The A04 Core’s advantage lies in potential software optimizations from Samsung, which could lead to slightly better color calibration. Bezels are expected to be substantial on both, and neither supports high refresh rates.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is likely to be similar, with both devices featuring basic camera setups. Details on sensor sizes are unavailable, but given the price, expect modest image quality. The Moto E40’s 10W charging is a notable disadvantage, suggesting a smaller battery capacity to minimize charging time. The A04 Core’s camera system is likely to benefit from Samsung’s image processing algorithms, potentially delivering more pleasing results in good lighting conditions. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on both is largely a marketing tactic, offering limited practical benefit.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. Samsung’s Exynos 850 (8nm) is a significantly more advanced processor than the Unisoc T700 found in the Moto E40. The 8nm fabrication process allows for greater transistor density and improved power efficiency compared to the T700. While both are octa-core, the A04 Core’s Cortex-A55 cores run at 2.0 GHz, versus the Moto E40’s 1.8 GHz. This translates to faster app launch times and smoother performance in everyday tasks. The A04 Core will handle multitasking and moderately demanding apps with greater ease. The Unisoc T700 is adequate for basic use, but will struggle with heavier workloads.
Battery Life
The Motorola Moto E40’s 10W wired charging is a significant drawback. While battery capacity isn’t specified, slower charging speeds indicate a smaller battery size to make the charging time manageable. The Samsung Galaxy A04 Core, lacking specific charging information, likely supports a similar or slightly faster charging rate. The Exynos 850’s 8nm process contributes to better power efficiency, potentially offsetting any battery capacity difference and providing longer real-world usage on the A04 Core.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Galaxy A04 Core if you need a phone capable of handling more demanding apps and multitasking, even if it's just social media and basic productivity. The Exynos 850 offers a more future-proof experience. Buy the Motorola Moto E40 if your primary needs are basic communication – calls, texts, and light web browsing – and you prioritize a slightly lower upfront cost, accepting a trade-off in processing power and responsiveness.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Exynos 850 chip in the A04 Core get noticeably hot during extended use?
The Exynos 850, built on an 8nm process, is relatively efficient. While it will warm up during prolonged gaming or video recording, it’s unlikely to experience significant overheating that leads to performance throttling. The Moto E40’s Unisoc T700 may also warm up, but its lower performance ceiling means it’s less likely to push the chip to its thermal limits.
❓ Is the 2MP macro camera on either phone worth using for close-up shots?
Generally, no. 2MP macro cameras on budget phones typically lack the detail and clarity to produce truly impressive close-up photos. They are often included as a marketing feature rather than a genuinely useful camera component. Expect soft, noisy images with limited resolution.
❓ Can the Samsung Galaxy A04 Core handle popular mobile games like PUBG Mobile or Call of Duty Mobile?
The A04 Core can *run* these games, but expect to play them at lower graphics settings (low or medium) to maintain a playable frame rate. The Exynos 850 is capable, but it’s not a gaming powerhouse. The Moto E40 will struggle significantly with these titles, likely requiring the lowest possible settings and still experiencing noticeable lag.
❓ How long will it take to fully charge the Motorola Moto E40 with its 10W charger?
Given the 10W charging speed, a full charge from 0% will likely take between 2.5 to 3.5 hours, depending on the battery capacity. This is a significant drawback compared to phones with faster charging capabilities.
