Samsung Galaxy A01 vs. A10e: Which Budget Phone Wins?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Samsung Galaxy A10e is the better choice. Its Exynos 7884 chipset, featuring Cortex-A73 cores, provides a noticeable performance advantage over the A01’s Snapdragon 439, especially in multitasking and app loading. While the A01 is cheaper, the A10e’s improved processing power justifies the slight price premium.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Samsung Galaxy A01 | Samsung Galaxy A10e |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - AT&T |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 14, 29, 30, 66 - AT&T |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE |
| 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 28 - SM-A015M | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 - Metro PCS, T-Mobile | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019, December 17. Released 2020, January | 2019, July. Released 2019, August |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 146.2 x 70.9 x 8.3 mm (5.76 x 2.79 x 0.33 in) | 147.3 x 69.6 x 8.4 mm (5.80 x 2.74 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 149 g (5.26 oz) | 141 g (4.97 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1520 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~294 ppi density) | 720 x 1560 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~295 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.7 inches, 81.6 cm2 (~78.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.83 inches, 83.4 cm2 (~81.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | PLS LCD | PLS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.45 GHz Cortex A53) | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A73 & 6x1.35 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM439 Snapdragon 439 (12 nm) | Exynos 7884 (14 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 505 | Mali-G71 MP2 |
| OS | Android 10, upgradable to Android 12, One UI Core 4.1 | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 11, One UI 3.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 16GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 2GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM |
| eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, 28mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm, AF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/1.9, AF or 5 MP, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, 1/5.0", 1.12µm | 5 MP, f/2.0 or 2 MP |
| Video | Yes | - |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio, RDS, recording | No |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Type | Li-Ion 3000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Ion 3000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Red | Black |
| Models | SM-A015F, SM-A015F/DS, SM-A015G, SM-A015G/DS, SM-A015M, SM-A015M/DS, SM-A015T1, SM-S111DL, SM-A015V, SM-A015A, SM-A015AZ, SM-A015U, SM-A015U1 | SM-A102U, SM-S102DL, SM-A102U1, SM-A102W, SM-A102N |
| Price | About 200 EUR | About 80 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.47 W/kg (head) 0.54 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.35 W/kg (head) 1.56 W/kg (body) | - |
| Pricing | ||
|---|---|---|
| 16GB 2GB RAM | $ 72.90 | - |
| RENEWED | $ 88.00 | - |
Samsung Galaxy A01
- Potentially lower price point
- Snapdragon 439 offers good power efficiency
- Functional for basic smartphone tasks
- Significantly slower performance than the A10e
- Less responsive user experience
- Limited multitasking capabilities
Samsung Galaxy A10e
- Faster performance thanks to Cortex-A73 cores
- Smoother multitasking and app loading
- More responsive user experience
- Slightly higher price
- Exynos 7884 is less power efficient than Snapdragon 439
- May not offer significantly better camera performance
Display Comparison
Neither the A01 nor the A10e are display champions. Specific display specs (resolution, brightness) are not provided, but both likely feature LCD panels typical of this price bracket. The A10e’s Exynos 7884 may offer slightly better display processing capabilities, potentially resulting in smoother scrolling. However, the real difference lies in the chipset’s ability to drive the display efficiently, which favors the A10e. Bezels are expected to be substantial on both devices, reflecting their budget nature.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance on both devices is expected to be basic. Without specific sensor details, it’s safe to assume both feature a primary camera and potentially a depth sensor. The A10e’s more powerful chipset could offer slightly better image processing capabilities, leading to marginally improved image quality. However, the difference will likely be minimal. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely a marketing gimmick and shouldn’t be a deciding factor.
Performance
The core difference between these phones is the chipset. The A01’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (12nm) utilizes eight Cortex-A53 cores, split into two clusters – 4x1.95 GHz and 4x1.45 GHz. This is a power-efficient but relatively slow configuration. The A10e’s Exynos 7884 (14nm) employs a more sophisticated arrangement: 2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A73 cores for performance and 6x1.35 GHz Cortex-A53 cores for efficiency. The Cortex-A73 cores are significantly more powerful than the A53 cores, resulting in faster app launches, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive overall experience. The 14nm process node on the Exynos is less efficient than the A01’s 12nm, but the architectural advantage of the A73 cores outweighs this.
Battery Life
Battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, but both likely house batteries in the 3000-4000 mAh range. The Snapdragon 439’s power efficiency might give the A01 a slight edge in battery life under light usage. However, the A10e’s more efficient chipset utilization could offset this during more demanding tasks. Charging wattage is also unknown, but both are likely to support slow charging speeds.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Galaxy A01 if you prioritize absolute lowest cost and primarily need a phone for basic communication – calls, texts, and light social media. It’s a functional device for those with minimal smartphone demands. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A10e if you value smoother performance for everyday tasks, occasional gaming, and a more responsive user experience. The A10e is the better option for anyone who doesn’t want to constantly fight lag.