The Samsung Galaxy A Quantum and Motorola Edge 30 Neo represent distinct approaches to the mid-range smartphone market. The A Quantum prioritizes security with its integrated QRNG chipset, while the Edge 30 Neo focuses on delivering a modern user experience with rapid charging and a bright display. This comparison dissects their strengths and weaknesses to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing convenience and speed, the Motorola Edge 30 Neo is the better choice. Its 68W charging significantly outperforms the A Quantum’s 25W, and the Snapdragon 695 offers comparable performance in everyday tasks. However, users with heightened security concerns may find the A Quantum’s QRNG a compelling feature.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, May 14. Released 2020, May 22 | 2022, September 08 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2022, October 07 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 162.5 x 75.5 x 8.1 mm (6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 in) | 152.9 x 71.2 x 7.8 mm (6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 185 g (6.53 oz) | 155 g (5.47 oz) |
| | - | Splash and dust resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~419 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~88.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.28 inches, 95.2 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED Plus | P-OLED, 120Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A77 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Exynos 980 (8 nm), QRNG security chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 10, One UI 2 | Android 12, planned upgrade to Android 15 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF
12 MP, f/2.2, 12mm (ultrawide)
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/240fps, 1080p@960fps; gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/60/120fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| | ANT+ | - |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 25W wired | 68W wired
5W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4020 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Prism Cube Black, Prism Cube Sliver, Prism Cube Blue | Very Peri, Black Onyx, Ice Palace, Aqua Foam |
| Models | SM-A716N, SM-A716SS, SM-A716S | XT2245-1 |
| Price | About 500 EUR | € 156.44 / $ 185.00 / £ 229.00 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 104h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.4 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 380818 (v9)
GeekBench: 1964 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Samsung Galaxy A Quantum
- Hardware-backed QRNG for enhanced security
- Potentially lower price point (depending on market)
- Established Samsung brand reputation
- Older chipset (Exynos 980)
- Slower 25W charging
- Limited display information
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
- Faster 68W wired and 5W wireless charging
- Brighter 1004 nit display
- More efficient Snapdragon 695 chipset
- Lacks dedicated security hardware like QRNG
- Potentially higher price point
- 2MP macro camera is likely low quality
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1004 nits, making it far more usable in direct sunlight compared to the A Quantum (brightness data unavailable). While the A Quantum’s display quality is unknown, the Edge 30 Neo’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio (nominal) suggests a strong performance in displaying deep blacks. The lack of information on the A Quantum’s panel type (LCD vs AMOLED) and refresh rate puts it at a disadvantage, as the Edge 30 Neo likely offers a smoother, more vibrant viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are limited. Without sensor size, aperture, or OIS information for either device, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the market positioning suggests the Edge 30 Neo likely benefits from more advanced image processing algorithms. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on the Edge 30 Neo is unlikely to be a significant differentiator, as these sensors often produce low-quality images. The A Quantum’s camera system remains largely unknown without further details.
Performance
Both devices utilize octa-core CPUs clocked at 2.2 GHz, but the underlying architecture differs. The A Quantum’s Exynos 980, built on an 8nm process, features Cortex-A77 cores, while the Edge 30 Neo’s Snapdragon 695 (6nm) uses Kryo 660 Gold cores. The 6nm process of the Snapdragon 695 generally translates to better power efficiency and potentially lower thermal throttling during sustained workloads. While both chipsets are capable of handling everyday tasks, the Snapdragon 695 is likely to offer a slight edge in gaming and demanding applications due to its more modern architecture and process node. The A Quantum’s QRNG chipset doesn’t directly impact CPU/GPU performance but adds a unique security layer.
Battery Life
Both devices share an endurance rating of 104 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life despite potentially different battery capacities (data unavailable for A Quantum). However, the Edge 30 Neo’s charging capabilities are a clear advantage. Its 68W wired charging allows for a significantly faster 0-100% charge compared to the A Quantum’s 25W. The addition of 5W wireless charging on the Edge 30 Neo provides further convenience, a feature absent on the A Quantum. The faster charging speed of the Edge 30 Neo mitigates any potential battery capacity disadvantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Galaxy A Quantum if you require a hardware-backed, truly random number generator for enhanced security in applications like mobile banking or secure messaging. Buy the Motorola Edge 30 Neo if you prioritize fast charging, a brighter display for outdoor visibility, and a more modern overall feature set without a significant performance penalty.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Exynos 980 in the Galaxy A Quantum overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Exynos 980, being an 8nm chip, is prone to some thermal throttling under sustained load. While it can handle casual gaming, demanding titles may experience frame drops after extended play. The Snapdragon 695 in the Edge 30 Neo, built on a 6nm process, is generally more thermally efficient.
❓ Is the QRNG security chip on the Galaxy A Quantum useful for everyday users?
The QRNG is most beneficial for users who prioritize security and privacy. It generates truly random numbers, which are crucial for secure encryption and authentication. For everyday tasks like browsing and social media, the benefits are minimal, but it provides a significant advantage for sensitive applications like mobile banking or secure messaging.
❓ How long does it take to fully charge the Motorola Edge 30 Neo with the 68W charger?
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo can charge from 0-100% in approximately 45-50 minutes with the included 68W charger. This is significantly faster than the Samsung Galaxy A Quantum’s 25W charging, which would likely take over an hour and a half.
❓ What is the real-world impact of the Snapdragon 695's 6nm process?
The 6nm process allows the Snapdragon 695 to operate more efficiently, consuming less power for the same level of performance. This translates to better battery life and reduced heat generation, leading to more consistent performance during demanding tasks.
