The Samsung Omnia PRO 4, a Windows Mobile device from 2009, represented a different era of mobile computing. Now, let's pit it against the modern Samsung Galaxy A54, a powerhouse of features and performance. This comparison explores how far smartphone technology has advanced.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Galaxy A54 is the clear winner. While the Omnia PRO 4 offered a unique blend of smartphone and PDA functionality for its time, the A54’s superior display, performance, camera, and battery life make it a vastly more compelling choice for today's users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA 7.2/0.384 Mbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 25, 41, 66, 71 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2010, June. Released 2010, October | 2023, March 15 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2023, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 117.7 x 59.8 x 11.9 mm (4.63 x 2.35 x 0.47 in) | 158.2 x 76.7 x 8.2 mm (6.23 x 3.02 x 0.32 in) |
| Keyboard | QWERTY | - |
| SIM | Mini-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 122 g (4.30 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| | - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 320 x 320 pixels, 1:1 ratio (~173 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 2.62 inches, 22.1 cm2 (~31.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT resistive touchscreen, 65K colors | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | - | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | - | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) |
| GPU | - | Mali-G68 MP5 |
| OS | Microsoft Windows Mobile 6.5 Professional | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDHC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 200MB | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | - | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 3.15 MP, AF | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.X", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 320p@15fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | - | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| | CIF | - |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 2.1, A2DP | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | - | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, A-GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Stereo FM radio, RDS | No |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Browser | WAP 2.0 / xHTML, HTML, Adobe Flash Lite | - |
| Sensors | - | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (USA only) |
| | MP3/WMA/WAV/eAAC+ player
MP4/WMV9/H.264 player
Windows Live, Yahoo!
Microsoft Outlook Mobile
Pocket Office
Voice memo
Predictive text input | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 25W wired |
| Stand-by | Up to 500 h (2G) / Up to 400 h (3G) | - |
| Talk time | Up to 9 h 20 min (2G) / Up to 5 h 40 min (3G) | - |
| Type | Removable Li-Ion 1500 mAh battery | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black | Lime, Graphite, Violet, White |
| Models | - | SM-A546V, SM-A546U, SM-A546U1, SM-A546B, SM-A546B/DS, SM-A546E, SM-A546E/DS, SM-A5460, SM-A546M, SM-A546M/DS, SM-A546W |
| Price | About 150 EUR | € 210.00 / $ 119.11 / £ 169.95 / ₹ 28,999 |
| SAR | 0.42 W/kg (head) 0.43 W/kg (body) | 0.81 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.64 W/kg (head) | 0.69 W/kg (head) 1.34 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 119h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.6 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 506678 (v9)
GeekBench: 2703 (v5.1), 2797 (v6)
GFXBench: 25fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Samsung B7350 Omnia PRO 4
- Nostalgic appeal
- Compact size (for its time)
- Windows Mobile OS (for enthusiasts)
- Outdated technology
- Poor performance
- Low-resolution display
- Limited app availability
- Short battery life
Samsung Galaxy A54
- Excellent display
- Powerful performance
- Great camera
- Long battery life
- Modern features
- Wide app availability
- Plastic build (depending on model)
- Charging speed could be faster
Display Comparison
The Galaxy A54 boasts a vibrant 980 nits max brightness display with an infinite contrast ratio, offering exceptional clarity and color accuracy. The Omnia PRO 4's display, typical of its era, was significantly smaller, lower resolution, and lacked the modern features like adaptive brightness and color profiles. The A54's display is a massive upgrade.
Camera Comparison
The Galaxy A54's camera system is far superior. It offers high-resolution photos and videos with advanced features like optical image stabilization. The Omnia PRO 4's camera was rudimentary by comparison, producing low-resolution images with limited capabilities.
Performance
The Exynos 1380 in the Galaxy A54 provides a significant performance boost over the Omnia PRO 4's likely older processor. The A54's octa-core CPU handles modern apps and multitasking with ease, while the Omnia PRO 4 would struggle with even basic tasks by today's standards. The A54's 5nm process also contributes to better power efficiency.
Battery Life
The Galaxy A54’s endurance rating of 119h (old) and active use score of 11:15h demonstrates exceptional battery life. The Omnia PRO 4 likely had a smaller battery and less efficient components, resulting in significantly shorter battery life.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Samsung B7350 Omnia PRO 4? Likely, only collectors or those seeking a nostalgic experience. Who should buy the Samsung Galaxy A54? Anyone looking for a reliable, feature-rich mid-range smartphone with excellent battery life and a great camera.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Was the Omnia PRO 4 a good phone in its time?
Yes, the Omnia PRO 4 was a respectable device in 2009, offering a blend of smartphone and PDA functionality. However, it's severely outdated by today's standards.
❓ Can I still find apps for the Omnia PRO 4?
Finding apps for Windows Mobile is extremely difficult now. The app ecosystem is essentially defunct.
❓ Is the Galaxy A54 worth buying in 2024?
Absolutely! The Galaxy A54 remains a compelling mid-range option with a great balance of features, performance, and battery life.
