The Samsung Ativ Tab P8510 and Galaxy Tab 3 10.1 represent different eras of Samsung's tablet lineup. Both offer a large 10.1-inch display, but their internal components and features differ significantly. Let's dive into a comprehensive comparison to determine which tablet remains the better choice today.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Galaxy Tab 3 10.1 edges out the Ativ Tab P8510 due to its slightly faster CPU and generally more refined software experience, despite both being older devices. While the Ativ Tab's Qualcomm chipset is capable, the Tab 3's Intel Atom offers a smoother overall feel for everyday tasks.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | N/A | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | - | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20 |
| EDGE | No | - |
| GPRS | No | - |
| Speed | - | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat3 100/50 Mbps |
| Technology | No cellular connectivity | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2012, October. Released 2012, November | 2013, June. Released 2013, Q3 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 265.8 x 168.1 x 8.9 mm (10.46 x 6.62 x 0.35 in) | 243.1 x 176.1 x 8 mm (9.57 x 6.93 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | No | Micro-SIM |
| Weight | 570 g (1.26 lb) | 510 g (1.12 lb) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1366 x 768 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~155 ppi density) | 1280 x 800 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~149 ppi density) |
| Size | 10.1 inches, 281.1 cm2 (~62.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 10.1 inches, 295.8 cm2 (~69.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | PLS LCD | TFT |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Dual-core 1.5 GHz Krait | Dual-core 1.6 GHz |
| Chipset | Qualcomm APQ8090A | Intel Atom Z2560 |
| GPU | Adreno 305 | PowerVR SGX544MP2 |
| OS | Microsoft Windows RT | Android 4.2.2 (Jelly Bean), TouchWiz UI |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 2GB RAM, 64GB 2GB RAM | 16GB 1GB RAM, 32GB 1GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | - |
| Single | 5 MP, AF | 3.15 MP |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 720p |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 1.9 MP | 1.3 MP |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.0, A2DP | 4.0, A2DP |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS, S-GPS, GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | 2.0, OTG | microUSB 2.0 (MHL 1.2), OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, grip | Accelerometer, compass |
| | HDMI port
MP4/DivX/Xvid/H.264 player
MP3/WAV/eAAC+ player
Photo viewer/editor
Document editor/viewer | TV-out |
| Battery |
|---|
| Music play | - | Up to 140 h |
| Talk time | Up to 12 h (multimedia) | Up to 9 h (multimedia) (2G) / Up to 40 h (3G) |
| Type | Li-Ion 8200 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 6800 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black | White, Gold Brown, Garnet Red, Midnight Black |
| Models | GT-P8510 | GT-P5220 |
| Price | About 440 EUR | About 290 EUR |
| SAR | 1.07 W/kg (body) | 1.54 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.16 W/kg (body) | 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality | - |
Noise -91.5dB / Crosstalk -90.5dB |
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 917 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
Voice 71dB / Noise 73dB / Ring 75dB
|
Samsung Ativ Tab P8510
- Budget-friendly
- Large 10.1-inch display
- Qualcomm chipset (potentially more efficient)
- Older processor
- Limited software updates
- Lower overall performance compared to Tab 3
Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 10.1 P5220
- Slightly faster processor
- More refined Android experience
- Potentially better display quality
- Older device
- Limited software updates
- May have battery degradation
Display Comparison
Both tablets feature a 10.1-inch display, likely with a resolution around 1280x800. While both boast a contrast ratio of 917 (nominal), the Galaxy Tab 3 10.1 may offer slightly better color accuracy and viewing angles due to potential advancements in display technology during its production. However, both will show their age with limited brightness and potentially washed-out colors in direct sunlight.
Camera Comparison
Camera quality on both devices is likely to be unremarkable by modern standards. Both feature basic photo and video capabilities, suitable for occasional snapshots but not for serious photography. Image quality will be limited by sensor size and processing capabilities.
Performance
The Galaxy Tab 3 10.1's 1.6 GHz dual-core Intel Atom Z2560 CPU holds a slight advantage over the Ativ Tab P8510's 1.5 GHz dual-core Krait processor. While both are dual-core, the Atom architecture often provides better efficiency and performance in Android tablets of this era. Expect the Galaxy Tab 3 to handle multitasking and app loading slightly faster.
Battery Life
Battery life is a crucial factor for tablets. While specific battery capacities aren't explicitly listed, the Galaxy Tab 3 10.1 likely has a slightly larger battery, potentially offering marginally longer usage time. Both devices will struggle to match the battery life of modern tablets.
Buying Guide
The Samsung Ativ Tab P8510 might appeal to users seeking a budget-friendly, large-screen tablet for basic tasks like web browsing and media consumption. The Galaxy Tab 3 10.1 is a better choice for those prioritizing a slightly more responsive experience and a more polished Android interface, even with its age.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Are these tablets still receiving software updates?
No, both the Ativ Tab P8510 and Galaxy Tab 3 10.1 are very old devices and no longer receive official software updates from Samsung. This means they are vulnerable to security risks and may not be compatible with the latest apps.
❓ Which tablet is better for gaming?
Neither tablet is ideal for modern gaming. Both have limited processing power and graphics capabilities. Older, less demanding games might run acceptably on either device.
