The Samsung Acclaim is a largely forgotten device shrouded in mystery, while the Gear S2 Classic 3G was a pioneering smartwatch. This comparison aims to shed light on these two Samsung offerings, exploring their strengths and weaknesses despite the Acclaim's limited available information.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Gear S2 Classic 3G is the clear winner. While the Acclaim likely offered a standard smartphone experience of its time, the Gear S2's smartwatch functionality, 3G connectivity, and wireless charging provide a more compelling and modern feature set, even with its older chipset.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | CDMA 800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | HSDPA |
| EDGE | - | No |
| GPRS | - | No |
| Speed | EV-DO Rev.0, 153.2 Kbps | - |
| Technology | CDMA / EVDO | GSM / HSPA |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2010, June. Released 2010, July | 2016, February. Released 2016, April |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), stainless steel frame |
| Dimensions | 114 x 59 x 15 mm (4.49 x 2.32 x 0.59 in) | 44 x 46.9 x 13.4 mm (1.73 x 1.85 x 0.53 in) |
| Keyboard | QWERTY | - |
| SIM | Mini-SIM | eSIM |
| Weight | 130 g (4.59 oz) | 54 g (1.90 oz) |
| | Optical trackpad | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 mins)
Compatible with standard 20mm straps |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 320 x 480 pixels, 3:2 ratio (~180 ppi density) | 360 x 360 pixels (~424 ppi density) |
| Size | 3.2 inches, 30.5 cm2 (~45.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 1.2 inches |
| Type | TFT, 256K colors | Super AMOLED |
| | - | Always-on display
Rotating bezel |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | - | Dual-core 1.0 GHz Cortex-A7 |
| Chipset | - | Exynos 3250 Dual |
| GPU | - | Mali-400MP2 |
| OS | Android 2.1 (Eclair), upgradable to 2.2 (Froyo) | Tizen OS 2.3.2 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDHC (dedicated slot), 4 GB included | No |
| Internal | - | 4GB 512MB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | - |
| Single | 3.15 MP, AF | - |
| Video | Yes | - |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 2.1, A2DP | 4.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | - | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, A-GPS | No |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | No |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g, hotspot (Android 2.2) | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/e |
| Features |
|---|
| Browser | HTML | - |
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer, gyro, heart rate, barometer |
| | MP4/H.264 player
MP3/WAV/eAAC+ player
Organizer
Document viewer
Voice memo
Predictive text input | S-Voice natural language commands and dictation
MP3/M4A/AAC/WAV player
Photo viewer
Voice memo/dial/commands
Samsung Pay |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | Wireless (Qi) |
| Stand-by | Up to 450 h | Up to 48 h (3G) |
| Talk time | Up to 8 h | - |
| Type | Removable Li-Ion 1500 mAh battery | Li-Ion 300 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Blue | Black, Rose Gold, ceramic bracelet |
| Price | About 170 EUR | About 250 EUR |
| SAR | 0.29 W/kg (head) 0.98 W/kg (body) | - |
Samsung Acclaim
- Likely larger display
- Potentially better camera
- Standard smartphone functionality
- Extremely limited information available
- Likely outdated hardware
- No smartwatch features
Samsung Gear S2 classic 3G
- Smartwatch functionality
- 3G connectivity
- Wireless charging (Qi)
- Stylish design
- Modest performance
- Limited app support compared to modern smartwatches
- Smaller display
- Battery life impacted by 3G usage
Display Comparison
Given the Acclaim was a smartphone, it likely featured a larger, higher-resolution display than the Gear S2 Classic 3G's 1.2-inch AMOLED screen. The Acclaim's display would have been optimized for media consumption and general smartphone use, while the Gear S2 prioritized readability and glanceability.
Camera Comparison
The Acclaim, as a smartphone, almost certainly had a camera, likely with a megapixel count significantly higher than the Gear S2 Classic 3G's 2MP camera. Image quality would have been considerably better on the Acclaim.
Performance
The Gear S2 Classic 3G's Dual-core 1.0 GHz Cortex-A7 processor and Exynos 3250 chipset are relatively modest by today's standards. The Acclaim, assuming it had a contemporary smartphone chipset for its release, likely offered better raw processing power, though optimization for a smartwatch OS is different than a full smartphone OS.
Battery Life
Battery life is a complex comparison. The Acclaim's larger battery capacity would likely provide longer usage for typical smartphone tasks. However, the Gear S2 Classic 3G's optimized smartwatch OS and smaller screen could potentially offer longer battery life for smartwatch-specific functions, though 3G usage would drain it quickly.
Buying Guide
The Samsung Acclaim is likely only of interest to collectors or those seeking a very specific, older smartphone. The Gear S2 Classic 3G is suitable for users wanting a stylish smartwatch with cellular connectivity for calls and data without needing a constant phone connection, though battery life and app support are considerations.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ What year was the Samsung Acclaim released?
The Samsung Acclaim was released in 2010, making it a very old device.
❓ Does the Gear S2 Classic 3G still receive software updates?
Software updates for the Gear S2 Classic 3G are no longer actively provided by Samsung.
