Realme X9 Pro vs Google Pixel 6 Pro: A Head-to-Head Comparison of Chipsets, Cameras, and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw speed, gaming, and incredibly fast charging, the Realme X9 Pro is the clear winner. However, the Google Pixel 6 Pro excels in camera capabilities, software experience, and display quality, making it the better choice for photography enthusiasts and those deeply integrated into the Google ecosystem.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Realme X9 Pro | Google Pixel 6 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 - GLUOG, G8VOU |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78, 257, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - G8VOU |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GLUOG | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | Not announced yet | 2021, October 19 |
| Status | Cancelled | Available. Released 2021, October 28 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 159.9 x 72.5 x 8 mm (6.30 x 2.85 x 0.31 in) | 163.9 x 75.9 x 8.9 mm (6.45 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 185 g (6.49 oz) | 210 g (7.41 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~512 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 110.6 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ | LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) | Octa-core (2x2.80 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) | Google Tensor (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Mali-G78 MP20 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128/256/512GB, 3/8/12GB RAM | 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF 16 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | - | 11.1 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.22µm |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, 25mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/3.5, 104mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS, 4x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 17mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1.25µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS, HDR | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 11.1 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.22µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Unspecified | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| - | Ultra Wideband (UWB) support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 65W wired 5W reverse wired | 23W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 30 min 23W wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Ion 5003 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Blue; other colours | Cloudy White, Sorta Sunny, Stormy Black |
| Models | - | GLUOG, G8VOU, GF5KQ |
| Price | - | € 199.99 / $ 204.99 / £ 275.00 / ₹ 29,699 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 84h |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 585485 (v8), 719815 (v9) GeekBench: 2831 (v5.1) GFXBench: 39 fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Realme X9 Pro
- Blazing-fast 65W wired charging
- Proven Snapdragon 870 performance
- Potentially more affordable price point
- Camera system likely less advanced
- Software updates may be less frequent
Google Pixel 6 Pro
- Exceptional camera with Google’s computational photography
- Smooth and intuitive software experience
- Brighter and higher contrast display
- Slower 23W wired charging
- Google Tensor chip performance can be inconsistent
Display Comparison
The Pixel 6 Pro boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured 846 nits, compared to an unspecified peak brightness for the X9 Pro. While the X9 Pro’s panel specifics are missing, the Pixel 6 Pro’s infinite contrast ratio (nominal) suggests a superior viewing experience, particularly with HDR content. The Pixel 6 Pro’s larger display size also contributes to a more immersive experience. However, without knowing the X9 Pro’s refresh rate or panel technology (LTPO), a definitive judgment on display smoothness is impossible.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 6 Pro’s camera system is a significant advantage. While specific sensor details are missing for the X9 Pro, the Pixel 6 Pro’s computational photography, powered by the Tensor chip, delivers exceptional image quality, particularly in low-light conditions. Google’s image processing excels in dynamic range and detail preservation. The X9 Pro likely relies more on hardware capabilities, and without knowing its sensor size or aperture, it’s difficult to assess its low-light performance. The Pixel 6 Pro’s focus on software-driven enhancements gives it a clear edge for most users.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Realme X9 Pro utilizes the Snapdragon 870 5G (7nm), an established performer known for its efficiency and sustained performance. Its octa-core configuration (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585, 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585, 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) provides a balanced approach. The Pixel 6 Pro, however, features Google’s Tensor (5nm) chip. While the Tensor’s Cortex-X1 cores (2x2.80 GHz) offer peak performance advantages, the 5nm process node suggests better thermal efficiency, potentially mitigating throttling during extended use. The X9 Pro’s Snapdragon 870 is a known quantity, while the Tensor’s real-world performance varies depending on the task, leaning heavily into AI and machine learning acceleration.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 84 hours, suggesting comparable overall battery life despite differing battery capacities (unspecified for the X9 Pro). However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The Realme X9 Pro’s 65W wired charging is significantly faster than the Pixel 6 Pro’s 23W wired charging (50% in 30 minutes). The X9 Pro also offers 5W reverse wired charging, while the Pixel 6 Pro includes 23W wireless and reverse wireless charging. This makes the X9 Pro the clear winner for users who prioritize quick top-ups, while the Pixel 6 Pro offers more versatile charging options.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme X9 Pro if you need a phone that can handle demanding games and applications without breaking the bank, and if 65W charging is a priority. You'll benefit from a consistently high frame rate and quick top-ups. Buy the Google Pixel 6 Pro if you prefer a superior camera system with Google’s computational photography prowess, a smoother, more intuitive software experience, and a brighter, more vibrant display. It’s ideal for users who value image quality and long-term software support.