The Realme X7 and Motorola Moto G 5G represent compelling options in the increasingly crowded mid-range 5G smartphone market. Both aim to deliver 5G connectivity without breaking the bank, but they take different approaches to achieving this. The X7 prioritizes raw processing power with the Mediatek Dimensity 800U, while the Moto G 5G focuses on a balanced experience with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G and a focus on battery endurance.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing gaming and demanding applications, the Realme X7 emerges as the winner. Its Dimensity 800U chipset offers a noticeable performance edge. However, the Motorola Moto G 5G provides excellent battery life and a more efficient processor for everyday tasks, making it a strong contender for those seeking longevity.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43 |
| 5G bands | 1, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G 2.3 Gbps DL | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, September 01. Released 2020, September 08 | 2020, November 05. Released 2020, December 07 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 160.9 x 74.4 x 8.1 mm (6.33 x 2.93 x 0.32 in) | 166.1 x 76.1 x 9.9 mm (6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 175 g (6.17 oz) | 212 g (7.48 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~82.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED | IPS LCD, HDR10 |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 800U (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 10, Realme UI | Android 10 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 2GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.3, 119˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm
2 MP (macro), AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/120fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | - |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | FM radio, RDS |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 65W wired, 100% in 33 min | 20W wired |
| Type | 4300 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Blue, White, Rainbow | Volcanic Gray, Frosted Silver |
| Models | RMX2176 | - |
| Price | About 330 EUR | About 90 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 131h |
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1419:1 |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-28.1 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 312461 (v8)
GeekBench: 1980 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Realme X7
- Faster charging (65W)
- Potentially higher CPU performance (Dimensity 800U)
- Likely better gaming performance
- Battery life potentially lower than Moto G 5G
- Unknown display brightness
- Camera details are limited
Motorola Moto G 5G
- Excellent battery endurance (131h rating)
- Brighter display (484 nits)
- More efficient processor (Snapdragon 750G)
- Slower charging (20W)
- Potentially lower CPU performance
- Camera details are limited
Display Comparison
Both phones share a contrast ratio of 1419:1, indicating similar levels of black depth and color vibrancy. However, the Motorola Moto G 5G boasts a measured peak brightness of 484 nits, which will provide better visibility in direct sunlight compared to the Realme X7 (brightness data unavailable). Without knowing the panel technology used in the X7, it's difficult to assess color accuracy or viewing angles, but the Moto G 5G's brightness advantage is a clear win for outdoor usability.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are limited. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. The absence of details suggests neither phone is positioned as a camera-centric device. The usefulness of any included macro cameras (likely 2MP on both) is questionable, as image quality is typically low. Image processing style will likely be the differentiating factor, but without sample images, it's impossible to assess.
Performance
The Realme X7’s Mediatek Dimensity 800U, fabricated on a 7nm process, features a CPU configuration of 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This contrasts with the Motorola Moto G 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G (8nm) with 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 cores and 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570 cores. The 7nm process of the Dimensity 800U generally allows for higher transistor density and potentially better performance, and the higher clock speeds on the A76 cores suggest a performance advantage in CPU-intensive tasks. However, the 8nm Snapdragon 750G is known for its efficiency, potentially leading to better thermal management during sustained loads. The X7 is likely to excel in benchmarks and gaming, while the Moto G 5G will offer smoother performance for everyday tasks.
Battery Life
The Motorola Moto G 5G claims an endurance rating of 131 hours, suggesting excellent battery life. While the Realme X7’s battery capacity is unknown, it compensates with a significantly faster 65W wired charging, achieving 100% charge in just 33 minutes. The Moto G 5G’s 20W charging is considerably slower. This means the Moto G 5G will likely last longer on a single charge, but the X7 can quickly top up when needed. The trade-off is between longevity and convenience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme X7 if you need a phone capable of handling demanding games and applications, and value faster charging speeds. Its Dimensity 800U chipset and 65W charging are ideal for power users. Buy the Motorola Moto G 5G if you prioritize all-day battery life and a more efficient processor for typical smartphone usage. The Moto G 5G is a better choice for users who don't heavily game or run resource-intensive apps.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Mediatek Dimensity 800U in the Realme X7 tend to overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Dimensity 800U is a capable processor, its 7nm process and higher clock speeds can generate more heat than the Snapdragon 750G's 8nm process. Thermal throttling is possible during extended gaming, but the extent will depend on the phone's cooling solution (which is not specified in the provided data). Expect some performance reduction after prolonged use.
❓ Is the 131-hour endurance rating of the Motorola Moto G 5G realistic in everyday use?
The 131-hour endurance rating is based on Motorola's testing methodology, which simulates typical usage patterns. Real-world battery life will vary depending on individual usage, including screen brightness, app usage, and network conditions. However, it suggests the Moto G 5G can comfortably last a full day, even with moderate to heavy use.
❓ Given the limited camera information, should I expect significant differences in photo quality between these two phones?
Based on the available data, don't expect a dramatic difference in photo quality. Both phones appear to be positioned as mid-range devices without a strong emphasis on camera performance. Image processing algorithms will likely be the primary differentiator, but without sample images, it's difficult to predict which phone will produce more pleasing results.
