Realme has consistently delivered impressive smartphones at competitive prices. The Realme X50 5G and Realme X3 were both popular choices, but which one holds up better today? This comprehensive comparison will delve into their key features to help you decide which device is right for you.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Realme X3 takes the crown thanks to its superior Snapdragon 855+ chipset, offering significantly better performance. While the X50 5G boasts 5G connectivity, the X3's raw power and often lower price make it the more compelling choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, July 08. Released 2020, July 08 | 2020, June 25. Released 2020, June 30 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.8 x 75.8 x 8.9 mm (6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) | 163.8 x 75.8 x 8.9 mm (6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 194 g (6.84 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~399 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.57 inches, 104.2 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~84.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.96 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855+ (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 620 | Adreno 640 (700 MHz) |
| OS | Android 10, Realme UI | Android 10, upgradable to Android 11, Realme UI 2.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.0 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.3, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF
12 MP, f/2.5, 51mm (telephoto), PDAF, 2x optical zoom
8 MP, f/2.3, 119˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@960fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Dual | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm
2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm
8 MP, f/2.2, 105˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Features | HDR | Panorama |
| Video | 1080p@30/120fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 30W wired, 70% in 30 min | 30W wired, 100% in 55 min |
| Type | 4200 mAh | 4200 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Jungle Green, Ice Silver | Glacier Blue, Arctic White |
| Models | RMX2144 | RMX2142, RMX2081, RMX2085, RMX2083 |
| Price | About 500 EUR | About 290 EUR |
Realme X50 5G
- 5G Connectivity
- Slightly more modern design
- Decent AMOLED display
- Less powerful chipset
- Slower charging
- Potentially higher price
Realme X3
- Superior performance (Snapdragon 855+)
- Faster charging
- Often more affordable
- Versatile camera system
Display Comparison
Both phones feature AMOLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deep blacks. The X50 5G likely has a slightly more refined panel with potentially better color accuracy, but the difference is minimal. Both have a 90Hz refresh rate for smoother scrolling.
Camera Comparison
The Realme X3 generally has a more versatile camera system, often featuring a higher resolution primary sensor and potentially better image processing. Both phones offer decent camera performance in good lighting, but the X3 tends to produce more detailed and vibrant photos. Low-light performance is comparable.
Performance
This is where the Realme X3 shines. The Snapdragon 855+ is a significantly more powerful chipset than the Snapdragon 765G. Expect noticeably faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance on the X3. The X50 5G is still capable, but it won't match the X3's raw power.
Battery Life
The Realme X3 has a slight edge in battery life, thanks to its efficient chipset and potentially a slightly larger battery capacity. Both phones support 30W fast charging, but the X3's faster charging time (55 minutes vs 70 minutes) is a small advantage.
Buying Guide
The Realme X50 5G is ideal for users prioritizing 5G connectivity and a slightly more modern design. The Realme X3 is a better pick for those seeking maximum performance on a budget and don't necessarily need 5G.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Realme X50 5G worth it if I need 5G?
If 5G is a must-have, the X50 5G is your only option here. However, consider if the performance trade-off is worth it.
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Realme X3 is significantly better for gaming due to its more powerful Snapdragon 855+ chipset.
❓ Are replacement parts readily available for these phones?
Parts availability may be decreasing for both models as they are older. However, both phones have a large enough user base that parts are still generally accessible, though potentially more expensive.
